HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3781  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 12:54 AM
speedog's Avatar
speedog speedog is offline
Moran supreme
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Posts: 2,579
Quote:
Originally Posted by bt04ku View Post
It's no Firepark, though.
And your point is?
__________________
Just a wee bit below average prairie boy in Canada's third largest city and fourth largest CMA
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3782  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 1:40 PM
SHOFEAR's Avatar
SHOFEAR SHOFEAR is offline
DRINK
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: City Of Champions
Posts: 8,211
Quote:
Originally Posted by outoftheice View Post
Some interesting tweets from Rogers Place in Edmonton last night complaining about the length of the lines for the bathroom. https://twitter.com/OilersNation/status/852381693717618688

After attending a concert at Rogers Place that had me waiting 15 minutes in line to get through security at the main entrance and ten minutes in line to access the second bowl (one of the two escalators was broken and they wouldn't let people use it as stairs) this doesn't surprise me one bit.

Thing is the NHL and the Flames keep pointing Rogers Place as the shining example of everything Calgary hopes to gain compared to our tired old Saddledome. All I saw was a shiny new arena with a large number of private boxes suffering from the exact same problems fans complain about at the Saddledome except the Saddledome offered far better concession options. If this is what progress looks like at the cost of hundreds of millions of taxpayer dollars the Flames can forget it.
The bathroom lines aren't that bad. Sure they are longer than what they were before, but because you now have 25 pissers rather than 7 or 8, the lines move very fast. With that many, the line is basically a slow constant moving march.
__________________
Lana. Lana. Lana? LANA! Danger Zone
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3783  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 5:19 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by craner View Post
But no replacement for McMahon.
That will happen. I think that's the project it makes sense to combine, leave the arena as a separate building. If they are smart, they will accommodate for a new baseball stadium along with a new football stadium and fieldhouse.
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3784  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 7:03 PM
tomthumb2's Avatar
tomthumb2 tomthumb2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by Calgarian View Post
That will happen. I think that's the project it makes sense to combine, leave the arena as a separate building. If they are smart, they will accommodate for a new baseball stadium along with a new football stadium and fieldhouse.
I don't think so. Under this new plan, McMahon only gets some renovations.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3785  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 7:04 PM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
Anything out yet on this?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3786  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 7:26 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Nope, Council pushed it back until after lunch to give themselves time to talk. Should be coming up shortly.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3787  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 7:46 PM
Calgarian's Avatar
Calgarian Calgarian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Calgary, AB
Posts: 25,187
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomthumb2 View Post
I don't think so. Under this new plan, McMahon only gets some renovations.
They will have to replace McMahon at some point, like the Saddledome it misses out on a lot of revenue from concerts and shows that can't be held there currently. Is that new report out yet?
__________________
Git'er done!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3788  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 8:13 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,607
Quote:
know full well that the economics essentially never works for public money to be put towards an arena like this
Depends what you mean by economics! Profit, economic activity boost, sure.

As for your other thoughts, funny you should mention that. Just a happy accident.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3789  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 8:23 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
New Arena is the top building centre of the image.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3790  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 8:30 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Bigtime View Post
New Arena is the top building centre of the image.

Interesting discussions. Are you there Aaron? I'm in red.

Anyway, key points in my view include:
- West village / stampede integration into an entertainment district, leveraging existing assets such as NMC, BMO Centre, and growing collection of hotel options north of the 4th street underpass
- Leveraging to build out Olympic Way into a "high street" entry to the stampede grounds, with restaurant, service and entertainment options
- Building on strength IE making a successful BMO Centre better and stronger, building out hall F and leveraging with arena
- Leverage green line
- No toxic clean-up required
- No major roadworks required
- No using prominent riverfront for a super large building

[EDIT]

Wonder if there is any thought around improving access to 4th street from the Reconciliation Bridge, so that from memorial it is a clear entry to Olympic Way avoiding McLeod completely. I get that Reconciliation access could create challenges up-stream at Memorial, but just throwing it out there. Clearly a direct path via the 4th Avenue connector would be best as it is free-flow at Memorial, but that is more substantial infrastructure.

Irrespective, I'm hopeful that going forward, more people choose LRT for events going forward. Fact that this site would be serviced by both the Green and Red lines is huge.

Last edited by suburbia; Apr 24, 2017 at 8:47 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3791  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 8:53 PM
UofC.engineer's Avatar
UofC.engineer UofC.engineer is offline
Laura Palmer
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Location: Twin Peaks, Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,033
Thanks fellas!

please keep the updates coming
__________________
I've got good news! That gum you like is going to come back in style!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3792  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 9:11 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
Nope I'm not there, just casually following along via twitter.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3793  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 10:02 PM
Rollerstud98 Rollerstud98 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 1,820
Any information on the arena itself? Capacity and things like that? Coral going to be torn down with this plan?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3794  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 10:07 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rollerstud98 View Post
Any information on the arena itself? Capacity and things like that? Coral going to be torn down with this plan?
I don't think any of those need to be nailed down for this phase.

The $500M redevelopment / expansion of the BMO Centre was mentioned as part of this proposed master plan, and that includes zapping the Corral.

Unfortunate about the coral bleaching issues in Australia though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3795  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 10:08 PM
patm patm is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2011
Posts: 639
Why keep CalgaryNext alive?

Short of the Flames deciding to pay for way more of it than they originally proposed, is there anything that could happen to make it viable? I thought it was essentially dead at this point. Weird vote. Even Nenshi voted to keep it alive.

I wonder if it's a bit of lip service to the Flames?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3796  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 10:19 PM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,607
Quote:
Originally Posted by patm View Post
Why keep CalgaryNext alive?

Short of the Flames deciding to pay for way more of it than they originally proposed, is there anything that could happen to make it viable? I thought it was essentially dead at this point. Weird vote. Even Nenshi voted to keep it alive.

I wonder if it's a bit of lip service to the Flames?
Because it is always good to have multiple options in a multi option analysis.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3797  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 10:32 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,088
Excited for you guys.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3798  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2017, 10:34 PM
suburbia suburbia is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 6,271
Quote:
Originally Posted by 5seconds View Post
As much as I don't like the public funding as proposed by CalgaryNext, I also don't like taking options off the table. If the Flames kicked in MUCH more money, it might start to make more sense...?
I think what the mayor has said is that in its *current* form it is dead. So yeah, if the Flames decided to kick in more, perhaps it becomes a viable option again. What we do know is that it is not viable in current form. If not viable, let's not waste time on it.

With Big Red, however, I'm sensing that this is a political maneuver. Anything to bog down Nenshi and ensure there is limited movement on all files.

Frankly speaking, if the Victoria Park option is the better plan, best to put all horses in front of this wagon and get it done. I really like that it will leverage the BMO expansion and redevelopment, and together that will be a fantastic facilities complex. Two train lines servicing it makes it hugely appetizing also.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3799  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2017, 12:12 AM
Just Build It's Avatar
Just Build It Just Build It is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Calgary
Posts: 1,631
Thank gif they've finally turned their attention to Victoria Park, it was the logical choice all along.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3800  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2017, 2:01 AM
PPAR's Avatar
PPAR PPAR is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 604
Two questions
Is the plan to keep the Saddledome as an operational facility, and potentially related, is there any talk of how this development could tie into an Olympic bid?
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Calgary > Projects & Construction Updates
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:44 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.