HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #161  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 9:02 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,137
i'll take empty nice buildings over lived in crappy ones.
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #162  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 9:10 PM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Further highlighting the disconnect.
     
     
  #163  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 9:42 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,341
Get that empty-home tax going, get fat on the revenue.
     
     
  #164  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 9:52 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by SpongeG View Post
i'll take empty nice buildings over lived in crappy ones.
I'll take nice lived in neighbourhoods over ones shamed into feeling guilty that their lots are needed to fix some non-existent housing shortage. There's absolutely no reason to upzone Vancouver as long as ten of thousands of units sit empty. It also points out the Great Lie that transit-oriented development is some miracle manna from heaven for Vancouver's workers - its just more empty investment vehicles.
     
     
  #165  
Old Posted Mar 31, 2017, 10:26 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
I'll take nice lived in neighbourhoods over ones shamed into feeling guilty that their lots are needed to fix some non-existent housing shortage. There's absolutely no reason to upzone Vancouver as long as ten of thousands of units sit empty. It also points out the Great Lie that transit-oriented development is some miracle manna from heaven for Vancouver's workers - its just more empty investment vehicles.
It's not a lie. The density of housing people is way higher at several of the transit nodes mentioned (Metrotown, Brentwood, Joyce, New Westminster Quay, etc) than anywhere else in the Lower Mainland. Even if 15% of the units there are sitting empty, they will still house multiples of ten of times more than the average Single Family neighbourhoods can house, even if these low density areas are at 100% capacity. Also, it is a lot more affordable to live around the high-density transit nodes, be it in home ownership/rental and transit costs, as well as the convenience to shop, dine, etc.

So what's not to love about all these high-density transit nodes?

Last edited by Vin; Mar 31, 2017 at 10:36 PM.
     
     
  #166  
Old Posted Apr 2, 2017, 7:24 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
How to ensure non-residents pay tax on Canadian real-estate profits



Published on: March 31, 2017 | Last Updated: April 1, 2017 9:53 AM

It should be easy to ensure that offshore property speculators pay capital gains taxes on their Canadian sales, but the B.C. government has given no sign it’s prepared to make the fix.


Immigration lawyers and Opposition politicians are pressing the province to start an information-sharing system that would make it much harder for house sellers to evade capital gains taxes by claiming they are “residents of Canada for tax purposes,” when they are not. Some critics estimate the tax loss at hundreds of millions of dollars.

This tax avoidance was at the centre of a recent B.C. Supreme Court ruling. Justice Kenneth Affleck ordered notary Tony Liu to pay $600,000 to a house purchaser he had represented.

That was to cover the capital gains tax the Canadian Revenue Agency demanded from the buyer, which should have been paid by the non-resident seller of a $5.6-million Vancouver mansion.

A property seller who does not pay income taxes here is required to pay a capital gains tax on 25 per cent of their profit on a house sale. Theoretically, the law is designed to advantage domestic buyers and sellers over speculators, particularly from offshore.

In practice, the capital gains rule is rarely enforced, in large part, lawyers say, because B.C. doesn’t collect or share up-to-date information on whether property sellers pay income taxes in Canada.

That task is inexplicably left to a real-estate industry “honour system” involving buyers, sellers and their agents, says Vancouver immigration lawyer Sam Hyman, who is among several experts offering a simple solution.

“How complicated is it to require a seller to produce proof they paid their income taxes as a Canadian tax resident?” asked Richard Kurland, a lawyer who produces the immigration newsletter Lexbase.

“This really spotlights B.C.’s unchanging position, which is that it refuses to include on government (property-transfer) forms the question: ‘Are you a tax resident of Canada?’” Kurland said.

“B.C. fails to create data that can be checked by Canada Revenue Agency, by not asking the right question. Instead, the B.C. government has begun asking, ‘What is your citizenship?’ But that’s irrelevant.”

In a city in which 45 per cent of the population is foreign-born, Kurland said, it would be straightforward for CRA to run a data match on people who claim they are tax residents of Canada to see if they are really paying income taxes.

“But if B.C. doesn’t go after the data, CRA can’t do its job.”

When B.C. Finance Ministry spokesman Jamie Edwardson was asked Friday if he thought there were problems associated with B.C. buyers being unable to prove sellers pay income taxes, he declined to answer and said the question should be directed to the Canada Revenue Agency.
Kurland, Hyman and Toronto-based immigration lawyer David Lesperance suggested the solution is for B.C. to build a brief delay into all house and condo sales while the Canada Revenue Agency confirms whether the seller of a property pays Canadian income taxes.

“There would be a nice pot of gold for tax collectors,” Lesperance said, if the B.C. government did this.

Hyman proposes a new property-transfer rule that would require a buyer, or their legal representative, to report each interim property purchase to the provincial land registry and Revenue Canada at the same time.

Tax officials, Hyman said, would then be able to share their information with Immigration Canada and Canadian Border Services, which would ensure the tax and immigration-status residency claims of the sellers are true.

“That way the buyer can obtain a ruling prior to completion of the transaction,” Hyman said. “This would replace the honour system, which allows a dishonest seller to pressure a purchaser who wants to make a deal to look the other way and not inquire of the seller’s tax status.”

The immigration lawyers say buyers in a heated real-estate market often don’t properly investigate the sellers’ claim on real-estate forms about their tax residency because they don’t want to have to withhold part of their payment out of fear the seller will back out of their tentative agreement.

Asked about that scenario, the Finance Ministry official said, “That’s the process in place. I wouldn’t speculate on whether someone’s going to lose a deal.”

B.C. New Democratic Party housing critic David Eby has run into a related reason the B.C. government does not provide data on who pays income taxes.

The MLA for Vancouver-Point Grey discovered in March through a freedom-of-information request that the Ministry of Finance maintains a tax-residency database for only 2014 and earlier.

“So even if you had a release form from a seller, saying ‘You have my permission to disclose to another person whether or not I’m a tax resident of B.C.,’ the province of British Columbia couldn’t tell you because they have no idea themselves,” said Eby.

“The most recent information they have on tax residency status on people is from 2014. Well, it’s 2017 now.”

Given the lack of data, Eby said, a buyer who hires “a diligent notary or lawyer” to search whether a seller really pays taxes in Canada can have no confidence they will find the truth.

If the seller turns out to be lying, the buyer could be liable for tens of thousands of dollars of the seller’s unpaid capital gains profit.

In addition to making it impossible to track down tax cheats, Eby said, the province’s outdated income tax information “opens up a whole series of other questions. If your tax data is three years old, how do you administer personal benefits, whether it’s the Registered Education Savings Plan or free health care?”
http://vancouversun.com/business/rea...estate-profits
     
     
  #167  
Old Posted Apr 3, 2017, 11:04 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,730
The West Side of Vancouver records the fewest March single family home sales on record:
http://vancitycondoguide.com/vancouv...ed-march-2017/

That's what happens when you price locals out of the market. Think about it for a moment, virtually every house west of Main Street is now priced for the foreign buyer, or the One Percenters.
     
     
  #168  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2017, 1:21 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
West of Main is being generous. More like west of North road.
     
     
  #169  
Old Posted Apr 4, 2017, 5:33 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,357
Quote:
Originally Posted by whatnext View Post
That's what happens when you price locals out of the market. Think about it for a moment, virtually every house west of Main Street is now priced for the foreign buyer, or the One Percenters.
I went to Cypress Mountain on Sunday and took note how many new mansions have gone up along the new road up the steep slope, so at least someone is still building new houses in West Vancouver. But you are completely correct and I don't know almost anyone living in West Vancouver. Regular working people just don't live there anymore.
     
     
  #170  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 12:35 AM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,730
To illustrate how inflated the Vancouver is, I give you two listings. Both in 1005 Beach, same floorplan, one floor apart. 1102 was sold for just over $1 million in 2015, and now 1202 is listed for $1.588 million! I'm not sure what was "renovated to the studs" as it's a 12 year old building the kitchen is basically a wall and an island. I recall 1102 looked completely contemporary.

1102
http://adriaanandryan.com/blog?id=91458

1202
http://blurealty.com/r2152202-1202-1005-beach-avenue
     
     
  #171  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 9:30 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,137
RCMP investigating controversial Vancouver land swap

SAM COOPER

Published on: April 5, 2017 | Last Updated: April 5, 2017 2:19 PM PDT



The construction site at Helmcken and Richards in downtown Vancouver. ARLEN REDEKOP / PNG

A complaint has been filed with the RCMP concerning a controversial City of Vancouver property exchange involving a luxury condo tower to be built in Yaletown, Postmedia has learned.

Complainant Glen Chernen of the South Vancouver Parks Society began forwarding information to investigators last fall, and officers confirmed in late March that they are continuing to investigate. They are interested in the development of a former City of Vancouver property at 508 Helmcken, information obtained by Postmedia shows.

This complex and previously confidential land exchange and development deal involves the City of Vancouver, B.C. Housing, developer Brenhill, and Vancouver realtor Bob Rennie, among other players. The deal was approved in-camera by Vancouver council in October 2012.

The deal started to move forward in late 2011, when Brenhill approached city officials with a land swap proposal, which was based on the construction of about 162 new social housing and affordable units on property owned by the developer at 1099 Richards, in order to unlock the re-development potential of a valuable piece of city land at 508 Helmcken, city documents say. Social housing units had been built on the property in 1986, and it was encumbered by a long-term lease to a social housing operator.

As plans moved forward in 2012, the city’s Helmcken property was valued internally by city staff at $15 million, for the purposes of the land exchange proposal with the developer in January 2013, documents show.


About two weeks later, in February 2013, a private appraisal commissioned by Brenhill showed that 508 Helmcken would be worth $80 million if rezoned as planned, Postmedia learned from B.C. Housing officials last week.

Now, four years after the city gave 508 Helmcken to the developer at a $15-million value, it has been assessed as high as $130 million by B.C. Assessment, and documents show that it could be worth even more at market rates.

The social housing project at 1099 Richards has now been completed and handed over to the city. And Brenhill has reportedly pre-sold the majority of units for its planned mixed-use, 36-storey luxury tower, including 454 residential units, at 508 Helmcken. MLS data shows units are being marketed by Rennie Marketing Systems, in connection with sales brokers at offshore-focused real estate companies, including New Coast Realty and Magsen Realty.

A 1,781-sq-ft, three-bedroom apartment in the yet-to-be-built luxury tower sold for $3 million last summer and a larger three-bedroom unit sold for over $3.5 million, Postmedia has learned.

Many documents related to the deal have only been disclosed by the City of Vancouver and B.C. Housing as a result of the steady pressure of freedom of information requests from community activists, and litigation, including a 2014 B.C. Supreme Court challenge which successfully quashed the deal’s rezoning. A judge said the city’s public process for the deal was inadequate. But the city won an appeal in April 2015.

Critics are asking whether city taxpayers got fair value in the extremely complex deal. There are also questions about whether the social and family-friendly housing benefits that city planners promised have actually resulted.

William McCarthy, a private developer, real estate consultant and past president of the Real Estate Institute of Canada, studied recently made public documents in order to provide an opinion on the controversial land swap.

“From what I have seen to date, the city and its taxpayers did not receive either financial value or ancillary benefits from this convoluted transaction,” McCarthy said. “Rather than … first commissioning a comprehensive property appraisal, engaging independent real estate experts to guide them, and then offering their site for sale in an open and fair bid process, the city instead … did the exact opposite.”

NDP housing critic David Eby has asked why B.C. Housing, which is mandated to provide social housing, provided a previously undisclosed $39-million loan to Brenhill. The loan in 2016 required reporting of pre-sales progress in the luxury tower.

It has also been revealed that realtor Bob Rennie was involved in bringing forward the loan proposal to B.C. Housing’s board, while Rennie was a member of that board, in November 2013.

Rennie recused himself from the discussion and approval of the funding for Brenhill from B.C. Housing in the deal, documents show. But B.C. Housing officials refused to disclose to Postmedia why Rennie recused himself.

This week, Rennie did not respond by deadline for information on this story. The developer Brenhill also did not respond to requests for information on the timing of its agreement with Rennie for this project.

“Bob Rennie was appointed to the B.C. Housing Management Commission’s Board of Directors on April 27, 2012 for a two-year term,” B.C. Housing stated in response to questions from Postmedia. “We are not aware of any contractual relationship he had with Brenhill.”

Rennie conducted himself in a similar fashion when the loan came before the B.C. Housing commissioners in February 2014. On that occasion, meeting minutes reveal that Rennie “left the boardroom due to the perception of a conflict of interest with this project.”

...

http://vancouversun.com/news/local-n...uver-land-swap
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #172  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 9:40 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,724
Wow, I bet Brenhill thought they landed a pretty good deal with CoV regarding the land exchange to be able to build a high density condominium tower, and at the same time doing the City a favour by helping them build an affodable apartment building. Little did they know that they could be embroiled in court case after court case. It is no wonder that more developers simply pack their bags and go somewhere else to build, rather than dealing with all the nonsense mostly found in Vancouver.

Question for the latest investigation is, did Vancouver's tax payers get a fair deal for this land swap? Answer is, but of course! Now the City not only owns a piece of lot from the exchange, but also a brand new affordable apartment building, instead of the crappy 4-storey structure that they had previously.

Last edited by Vin; Apr 5, 2017 at 9:52 PM.
     
     
  #173  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 9:55 PM
SpongeG's Avatar
SpongeG SpongeG is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Location: Coquitlam
Posts: 40,137
New Westminster poised to become real estate hot spot: study
By Emma Crawford Hampel | April 5, 2017, 10:20 a.m.


New Westminster is set to become a real estate hot spot, according to a REIN report | Shutterstock


Benchmark home prices have fallen, but they remain near record highs in Vancouver, and homebuyers are extending their reach beyond the city limits.

As buyers turn to other municipalities across the region where prices aren’t quite so prohibitive, New Westminster in particular is set to become one of the province’s top real estate destinations within the next decade, according to a Real Estate Investment Network (REIN) report released April 5.

...

https://www.biv.com/article/2017/4/n...tate-hot-spot/
__________________
belowitall
     
     
  #174  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 10:18 PM
ThePatriot1776 ThePatriot1776 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2017
Posts: 2
If you want a new mcmansion a nice new truck and a real job where you can actually pay your bills then look south to Texas. The economy in Texas is booming luckily for me my American citizenship gives me many options to live somewhere where it's not freezing and raining 6 months of the year. I feel sorry for Canadians who are stuck up here. If your Canadian and have the skills or a way to move to the US you will be thanking yourself later! If you own property in Canada I would be selling now as the Canadian economy will collapse soon due to the ridiculous overvalued real estate and the obscene taxes
     
     
  #175  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 10:27 PM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,341
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePatriot1776 View Post
If you want a new mcmansion a nice new truck and a real job where you can actually pay your bills then look south to Texas. The economy in Texas is booming luckily for me my American citizenship gives me many options to live somewhere where it's not freezing and raining 6 months of the year. I feel sorry for Canadians who are stuck up here. If your Canadian and have the skills or a way to move to the US you will be thanking yourself later! If you own property in Canada I would be selling now as the Canadian economy will collapse soon due to the ridiculous overvalued real estate and the obscene taxes
Cool story bro.
     
     
  #176  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 10:58 PM
whatnext whatnext is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 26,730
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePatriot1776 View Post
If you want a new mcmansion a nice new truck and a real job where you can actually pay your bills then look south to Texas. The economy in Texas is booming luckily for me my American citizenship gives me many options to live somewhere where it's not freezing and raining 6 months of the year. I feel sorry for Canadians who are stuck up here. If your Canadian and have the skills or a way to move to the US you will be thanking yourself later! If you own property in Canada I would be selling now as the Canadian economy will collapse soon due to the ridiculous overvalued real estate and the obscene taxes
Hopefully the USA doesn't collapse in the inevitable orgy of gun violence, race riots and widespread drug use before you get settled. Don't let the door hit ya'.....
     
     
  #177  
Old Posted Apr 5, 2017, 11:09 PM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePatriot1776 View Post
If you want a new mcmansion a nice new truck and a real job where you can actually pay your bills then look south to Texas. The economy in Texas is booming luckily for me my American citizenship gives me many options to live somewhere where it's not freezing and raining 6 months of the year. I feel sorry for Canadians who are stuck up here. If your Canadian and have the skills or a way to move to the US you will be thanking yourself later! If you own property in Canada I would be selling now as the Canadian economy will collapse soon due to the ridiculous overvalued real estate and the obscene taxes
So, do they pay you by the word or sentence count? Or does it have to be a full paragraph before you can add it to your quota for the day?
     
     
  #178  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2017, 10:44 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,044
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
I went to Cypress Mountain on Sunday and took note how many new mansions have gone up along the new road up the steep slope, so at least someone is still building new houses in West Vancouver. But you are completely correct and I don't know almost anyone living in West Vancouver. Regular working people just don't live there anymore.
I don't think regular working people ever lived in the British Properties...

Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePatriot1776 View Post
If you want a new mcmansion a nice new truck and a real job where you can actually pay your bills then look south to Texas. The economy in Texas is booming luckily for me my American citizenship gives me many options to live somewhere where it's not freezing and raining 6 months of the year. I feel sorry for Canadians who are stuck up here. If your Canadian and have the skills or a way to move to the US you will be thanking yourself later! If you own property in Canada I would be selling now as the Canadian economy will collapse soon due to the ridiculous overvalued real estate and the obscene taxes
As an American Citizen living in Canada I think we're cool to let you guys wallow in your own hyper-politicized mess.

Enjoy!
     
     
  #179  
Old Posted Apr 6, 2017, 11:20 PM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Now for some softer news

Quote:
Advocates aim to abolish no-pet policies in B.C. rental properties

Sarah Petrescu, Victoria Times Colonist
More from Sarah Petrescu, Victoria Times Colonist


Published on: April 5, 2017 | Last Updated: April 5, 2017 3:28 PM PDT



No-pet policies are common in tight rental markets like Victoria. Times

VICTORIA — A public meeting in Victoria this weekend will bring together animal advocates, landlords and government officials to discuss the increasing shortage of rentals for pet owners.

“The idea is to have an honest conversation,” said Jordan Reichert from Pets OK B.C., a community organization that wants the provincial government to repeal parts of the Residential Tenancy Act that allow blanket no-pet policies in residences.

“We need to hear more from landlords about their concerns as well as pet owners. We all have a social responsibility because of the tremendous amount of cats and dogs being left at the SPCA,” Reichert said. “For some people, especially seniors, pets are their only companion.”

The town hall event, hosted by Pets OK B.C. and the Mustard Seed, starts at 1 p.m. Saturday at the Cook Street Activity Centre in Cook Street Village. Panellists will include legal experts and a property manager.
For some people, especially seniors, pets are their only companion
“This is a real struggle for a lot of people. We need to do something about it,” said Bruce Curtiss, executive director of the Mustard Seed Food Bank. “Maybe there’s something we can do to address concerns and help people open up about having pets.”

According to Pets OK B.C., more than 1,774 pets are surrendered to the B.C. SPCA each year because of rental restrictions. The animal-shelter organization has been vocal about its opposition to no-pet policies and promotes responsible-ownership awareness as a solution.


Dave Hutniak from Landlord B.C., an organization for landlords, said he was invited to the forum but could not make it. He said his members’ position is that the law should remain as is and landowners should be able to decide if they want to allow pets in their properties.

“We’re not insensitive to the fact that people love their pets. But the fact is there are pet-friendly buildings out there and there are new developments being built,” said Hutniak, adding the problem stems from the incredibly tight rental market.

“If there were better vacancy rates, more landlords might consider pets. There would be more choices,” Hutniak said.

The vacancy rate in Victoria is about 0.5 per cent, one of the lowest in the country. “That’s why we’re in the business of promoting affordable rental housing,” Hutniak said.

Reichert agreed that the lack of affordable rental housing is a major part of the problem for pet owners, but said legislation still needs to change. He pointed to Ontario, which does not allow blanket no-pet policies.

“In Ontario, a landlord can still prevent a renter from bringing a problem pet, but it’s done on a more individual-situation basis,” he said.
http://vancouversun.com/news/local-n...tal-properties
     
     
  #180  
Old Posted Apr 7, 2017, 5:16 AM
Pinion Pinion is offline
See ya down under, mates
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,167
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThePatriot1776 View Post
If you want a new mcmansion a nice new truck and a real job where you can actually pay your bills then look south to Texas. The economy in Texas is booming luckily for me my American citizenship gives me many options to live somewhere where it's not freezing and raining 6 months of the year. I feel sorry for Canadians who are stuck up here. If your Canadian and have the skills or a way to move to the US you will be thanking yourself later! If you own property in Canada I would be selling now as the Canadian economy will collapse soon due to the ridiculous overvalued real estate and the obscene taxes
My family was really close to moving to Dallas in the 90s. Very glad we didn't - went down to visit and decided it wasn't for us.

Would have been fine with Palo Alto, CA, though, which was the other option.

Austin also looks tolerable.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Business & the Economy
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.