Quote:
Originally Posted by bunt_q
--Developing that lot - GREAT. (As an aside, I think that lot actually falls outside the LoDo district. Would be fascinating to get something modern and glassy plopped right there, ha.)
--Tying the Rockies to Coors Field for 30 more years - GREAT. (By the time that lease expires, that ballpark will be legitimately historic and nobody will ever think to tear it down.)
--Not coming back to the voters again - GREAT.
|
Agree with all that. The amazing things is that stadiums the same age or younger than Coors Field are now being torn down. Damn, that makes me feel old when a stadium I think of as still relatively "new" (Turner Field, Rangers Stadium), has gone through its entire "life cycle" and is now being replaced.
While on the one hand it shows that Coors Field was extremely well designed and continues to be economically useful and successful 23 years later, it also shows the level to which taxpayer subsidies of sport owner billionaires has gone: not only must tax payers build billionaires stadiums, but in many cases they will be expected to tear down the old one and build yea another new one 20 years later!