HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Gold House North in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Burnaby Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #121  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 12:31 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,591
Quote:
Originally Posted by BobLoblawsLawBlog View Post
I could really see Maywood looking like the Olympic Village neighbourhood in Vancouver. With lower 7-12 storey apartments and commercial fronted streets.

Burnaby better not screw it up.
I suspect most of the towers will be 12-20 stories.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #122  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 2:16 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
After Aldynne totally fooling us with its rendering, I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly the same teal spandrel as everywhere else. Their excuse to misleading would be that the rendering is is in an evening setting, hence there is less light, changing the color (or similar BS).

One thing I don't understand is how developers can be so damn idiots and blind not to se how sweet those darker spandrel colors look in their misleading renderings. Why they keep building mediocre crap when there would be absolutely no difference in cost to go even slightly more exotic with their spandrel color is beyond me.
You'd be surprised the degree to which Design Planning committees of the various cities and municipalities wield a great deal of influence and sway in the some of the design decisions and choices that are taken in these design processes and permit applications.

I know from experience that places like West Vancouver and North Vancouver basically boil down to what the city and the Design planning department want more so than what the architect designed or what the owner or developer want.

I imagine Burnaby has a lot more leeway for the designers and the developers than Vancouver, Richmond, West and North Van, but still....

It's no accident that buildings tend to end up looking like each other a lot in cities.
It's not so much that the architects or designers are unoriginal or that the developers or cheap, but more so the narrow-mindedness of the officials giving the permits.
Some of their preferences (these committees and officials) are just downright boneheaded and backward when it comes down to it and all rationalized by wanting to keep the "picture-esque" characteristic of Vancouver.

bleghhh.....
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #123  
Old Posted Aug 14, 2016, 8:02 PM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
You'd be surprised the degree to which Design Planning committees of the various cities and municipalities wield a great deal of influence and sway in the some of the design decisions and choices that are taken in these design processes and permit applications.

I know from experience that places like West Vancouver and North Vancouver basically boil down to what the city and the Design planning department want more so than what the architect designed or what the owner or developer want.

I imagine Burnaby has a lot more leeway for the designers and the developers than Vancouver, Richmond, West and North Van, but still....

It's no accident that buildings tend to end up looking like each other a lot in cities.
It's not so much that the architects or designers are unoriginal or that the developers or cheap, but more so the narrow-mindedness of the officials giving the permits.
Some of their preferences (these committees and officials) are just downright boneheaded and backward when it comes down to it and all rationalized by wanting to keep the "picture-esque" characteristic of Vancouver.

bleghhh.....
Agree with your assessment, Vancouver area design planning committees are reflective of the wider Vancouver community aesthetic preferences, that is to say cautious and safe. Any design the least bit bold or original results in immediate hand wringing. Sadly, locals prefer to take architectural inspiration from the likes of Edmonton as opposed to Barcelona.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #124  
Old Posted Aug 28, 2016, 8:47 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
My pics from today.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #125  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2016, 11:24 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,699
From Boffo Twitter.

Gold House site is cleared to the left of Modello (with crane).


https://twitter.com/BoffoGroup
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #126  
Old Posted Sep 1, 2016, 11:40 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,407
So much potential... Great times ahead for Metrotown!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #127  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2016, 3:07 PM
sburnaby33 sburnaby33 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2016
Posts: 169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
You'd be surprised the degree to which Design Planning committees of the various cities and municipalities wield a great deal of influence and sway in the some of the design decisions and choices that are taken in these design processes and permit applications.

I know from experience that places like West Vancouver and North Vancouver basically boil down to what the city and the Design planning department want more so than what the architect designed or what the owner or developer want.

I imagine Burnaby has a lot more leeway for the designers and the developers than Vancouver, Richmond, West and North Van, but still....

It's no accident that buildings tend to end up looking like each other a lot in cities.
It's not so much that the architects or designers are unoriginal or that the developers or cheap, but more so the narrow-mindedness of the officials giving the permits.
Some of their preferences (these committees and officials) are just downright boneheaded and backward when it comes down to it and all rationalized by wanting to keep the "picture-esque" characteristic of Vancouver.

bleghhh.....
I was unaware how much say local officials have regarding the architecture in their cities. The fact that they have to make developments so bland that they do not "overshadow" the natural scenery is absurd. There is only so much glass, silver/gray trim, spandrel, and exposed concrete someone can take. Iconic buildings that incorporate livable and pedestrian friendly street-scapes are possible.

When I first looked at the rendering of Gold House I was excited to see that something different would be built. The colors and mural (?) at the base look appealing. However, I hope that would be the end result and that the city and developers will not tone things down.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #128  
Old Posted Sep 2, 2016, 4:26 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,169
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
You'd be surprised the degree to which Design Planning committees of the various cities and municipalities wield a great deal of influence and sway in the some of the design decisions and choices that are taken in these design processes and permit applications.

I know from experience that places like West Vancouver and North Vancouver basically boil down to what the city and the Design planning department want more so than what the architect designed or what the owner or developer want.

I imagine Burnaby has a lot more leeway for the designers and the developers than Vancouver, Richmond, West and North Van, but still....

It's no accident that buildings tend to end up looking like each other a lot in cities.
It's not so much that the architects or designers are unoriginal or that the developers or cheap, but more so the narrow-mindedness of the officials giving the permits.
Some of their preferences (these committees and officials) are just downright boneheaded and backward when it comes down to it and all rationalized by wanting to keep the "picture-esque" characteristic of Vancouver.

bleghhh.....
It's always been my understanding that the developers try to cut as many costs as possible. I have a hard time believing that any city would want bland looking buildings. I'm certain the CoV would welcome any proposal that shows some substance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #129  
Old Posted Sep 17, 2016, 4:58 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,699
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #130  
Old Posted Sep 30, 2016, 1:13 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,699
By Yellow Fever taken Sept 22:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #131  
Old Posted Oct 11, 2016, 5:50 AM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
From GRIDS Vancouver Twitter:



https://twitter.com/GRIDSVancouver
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #132  
Old Posted Dec 16, 2016, 1:25 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,699
By Yellow Fever taken Dec 11th posted Dec 13th:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
DEc 13, sorry for the quality, took these from the train.

20161211_115813 by Yellow Fever @ SkyscraperCity, on Flickr

20161211_115809 by Yellow Fever @ SkyscraperCity, on Flickr

20161211_115807 by Yellow Fever @ SkyscraperCity, on Flickr

20161211_115805 by Yellow Fever @ SkyscraperCity, on Flickr
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #133  
Old Posted Dec 21, 2016, 2:31 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,407
Crane went up today.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #134  
Old Posted Jan 6, 2017, 11:14 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,699
From Rize Twitter Dec 14, 2017 - foundation pic - so under construction:


https://twitter.com/RizeAlliance

http://www.rize.ca/blog/a-symbol-of-good-luck-gold-foundation-at-gold-house/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #135  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2017, 12:12 PM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 713
Came across this pic of the podium facade on the Buy RIC website:


http://www.buyric.com/ca/bc/2016/07/06/1...development-closes-sales-center-burnaby/

And a pic of the model in case one hasn't been posted yet:


http://www.buyric.com/ca/bc/2016/07/06/1...development-closes-sales-center-burnaby/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #136  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2017, 12:15 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 17,979
Why is such a podium light display not on a tower downtown Vancouver?

This is what part of the wall along Granville with Nordstrom should have looked like.

This feels backwards to have such a display on a residential tower. I hope this wall is at least facing towards the sky train.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #137  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2017, 5:43 PM
Prometheus's Avatar
Prometheus Prometheus is offline
Reason and Freedom
 
Join Date: Jul 2009
Location: Vancouver/Toronto
Posts: 4,016
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post

I hope this wall is at least facing towards the sky train.
The main part of the screen faces Beresford Street, which is being turned into a retail street, and the Skytrain guideway. A rendering of that part of the screen is on the first page of this thread.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #138  
Old Posted Feb 14, 2017, 6:41 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,972
It's a pity they're not doing both towers simultaneously and are instead phasing the project.

Would have loved to see both go up together like the two at Station Square.
And also just have the neighboring residences be over and done with the construction commotion in one go rather than one long prolonged period with one tower after the other.

Once the Sun Towers construction a block over from Silver begins to take place that corridor is really going to start taking on an dense urban (or sub-urban) residential feel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #139  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2017, 9:28 AM
burnaby-user burnaby-user is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 15
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
It's a pity they're not doing both towers simultaneously and are instead phasing the project.

Would have loved to see both go up together like the two at Station Square.
When is the 2nd tower scheduled for completion?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #140  
Old Posted Feb 15, 2017, 8:33 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,972
Quote:
Originally Posted by burnaby-user View Post
When is the 2nd tower scheduled for completion?
I don't really know.
I more fitting question would be when is it scheduled to BEGIN excavation and construction.

That might give a better idea of what its schedule and timeline will be like.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 10:45 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.