HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1261  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 7:34 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
20% is a large volume. If you removed that supply to the US, they would be in hard times. Pumps running dry and such. Either way, I don't see it happening. But with all this Trump garbage, who knows where we're headed.
http://money.cnn.com/2016/08/09/investing/us-energy-independence-oil-opec/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1262  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 7:37 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,067
From what I have been reading, KXL approval will put a bullet in Energy East. Quebec will be a big loser again - largely self inflicted. Alberta will be called on to up transfer payments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1263  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 7:59 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,364
Well, that is through CNN. So there's that. I was more talking about a border export war with the US. Exports form both side cease like next year. If there supply of oil suddenly stopped, what would they do?

Also this quote:

Under its baseline scenario, the U.S. wouldn't become energy independent through 2040, though it would get pretty close.

However, if shale production accelerates, thanks in part to more rapid technological improvements, the EIA projects the U.S. would become a "net petroleum exporter by 2024." If oil prices rise sharply, surpassing $100 a barrel in the next few years, the EIA thinks the U.S. could achieve complete energy independence by 2022.


We'll see how she goes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1264  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2017, 9:15 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
Well, that is through CNN. So there's that. I was more talking about a border export war with the US. Exports form both side cease like next year. If there supply of oil suddenly stopped, what would they do?

Also this quote:

Under its baseline scenario, the U.S. wouldn't become energy independent through 2040, though it would get pretty close.

However, if shale production accelerates, thanks in part to more rapid technological improvements, the EIA projects the U.S. would become a "net petroleum exporter by 2024." If oil prices rise sharply, surpassing $100 a barrel in the next few years, the EIA thinks the U.S. could achieve complete energy independence by 2022.


We'll see how she goes.
Haha Fake News! I don't see Trump going after our steel where trade is pretty balanced and the manufacturers are integrated across borders. He can't stop Regina pipe and expect to sell U.S. heavy plate or rebar in Canada.

I see Trump going after all the same items the states has always gone after: softwood lumber, dairy. eggs. poultry and cultural media. Beef has also been a target on dubious safety claims and country of origin labelling.

Canada has a list of products it likes to retaliate on like California wine, but Trump won't care about that. It will have to be Carrier Air Conditioners or something close to his heart.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1265  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2017, 10:55 PM
1ajs's Avatar
1ajs 1ajs is offline
ʇɥƃıuʞ -*ʞpʇ*-
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: lynn lake
Posts: 26,524
https://www.steinbachonline.com/local/mystery-mineral-becoming-more-clear

Mystery Mineral Becoming More Clear


Category: Local News
Published: Monday, 06 February 2017 05:19
Written by Rachel Siemens
Additional information has been made available on the mystery mineral claims in southeastern Manitoba.

The 452 claims cover a vast 120,328 hectares of land in several municipalities including Hanover, La Broquerie, Springfield, Tache, and Ste. Anne (map of claim area can be seen below). Mineral Resources Assistant Deputy Minister Tim Friesen says the numbered Alberta company, 1993502 Alberta Ltd, has made a considerable effort in acquiring mining rights in the Southeast, adding they are still in the very early stages of the development process.

Friesen explains subsurface rights are owned by the Crown and available for lease by interested parties, though there are a few areas which are privately owned. He says there are two main forms of tenure including mineral exploration licenses, governed under the Mines and Minerals Act, and oil and gas, governed under the Oil and Gas Act. Friesen adds companies look for opportunities across the country based on geology, available data, and other factors they can identify for possible mineral, oil, or gas targets.

Friesen says companies who take out subsurface claims do have a schedule set out by the province as to when they need to either be doing work or be paying fees for the claims.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1266  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2017, 7:03 PM
rrskylar's Avatar
rrskylar rrskylar is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2004
Location: WINNIPEG
Posts: 7,641
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stormer View Post
From what I have been reading, KXL approval will put a bullet in Energy East. Quebec will be a big loser again - largely self inflicted. Alberta will be called on to up transfer payments.
With the drop in the price of oil and other commodities it will be interesting to see how much the decrease in transfer payments from BC, Alberta and Sask. will be, goofy Justin and all his "we are the world" funding of anything but in Canada is going to come to a crashing halt!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1267  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2017, 7:06 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,364
On that mineral thing. What are they looking for, sand? Maybe they think there's oil in them sands.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1268  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2017, 8:14 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
On that mineral thing. What are they looking for, sand? Maybe they think there's oil in them sands.
I would guess that some sharp-eyed geologist in Calgary spotted something and someone will be drilling a wildcat oil well to see if the theory pans out. They want to secure the surrounding rights before word gets out.

Last edited by Stormer; Feb 12, 2017 at 5:46 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1269  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2017, 12:20 AM
Pinus Pinus is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Posts: 1,409
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1ajs View Post
https://www.steinbachonline.com/local/mystery-mineral-becoming-more-clear

Mystery Mineral Becoming More Clear


Category: Local News
Published: Monday, 06 February 2017 05:19
Written by Rachel Siemens
Additional information has been made available on the mystery mineral claims in southeastern Manitoba.

The 452 claims cover a vast 120,328 hectares of land in several municipalities including Hanover, La Broquerie, Springfield, Tache, and Ste. Anne (map of claim area can be seen below). Mineral Resources Assistant Deputy Minister Tim Friesen says the numbered Alberta company, 1993502 Alberta Ltd, has made a considerable effort in acquiring mining rights in the Southeast, adding they are still in the very early stages of the development process.

Friesen explains subsurface rights are owned by the Crown and available for lease by interested parties, though there are a few areas which are privately owned. He says there are two main forms of tenure including mineral exploration licenses, governed under the Mines and Minerals Act, and oil and gas, governed under the Oil and Gas Act. Friesen adds companies look for opportunities across the country based on geology, available data, and other factors they can identify for possible mineral, oil, or gas targets.

Friesen says companies who take out subsurface claims do have a schedule set out by the province as to when they need to either be doing work or be paying fees for the claims.
This is practically on Winnipeg's doorstep. Intriguing.

However, apart from throwing darts at a board about whether it's oil and gas or minerals (which we all could have guessed on our own), nothing has really become more "clear" in the true sense.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1270  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 12:39 AM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197


(Courtesy GPP Architecture)

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/facelife-for-international-peace-garden-1.3712713

Reg: International Peace Garden tower discussed in Man. Construction.

Does anyone know if the Man. government has committed to the funding of the new structure? Or we still at the wait and see phase?
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1271  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 1:43 AM
OTA in Winnipeg OTA in Winnipeg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Silver Heights
Posts: 1,798
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pinus View Post
This is practically on Winnipeg's doorstep. Intriguing.

However, apart from throwing darts at a board about whether it's oil and gas or minerals (which we all could have guessed on our own), nothing has really become more "clear" in the true sense.
I hear Lithium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1272  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 2:06 AM
Authentic_City's Avatar
Authentic_City Authentic_City is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 1,790
Quote:
Originally Posted by OTA in Winnipeg View Post
I hear Lithium.
I hear it too

• Video Link
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1273  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2017, 2:23 AM
OTA in Winnipeg OTA in Winnipeg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2016
Location: Silver Heights
Posts: 1,798
Nice!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1274  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 7:59 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,364
More 'minerals' in Manitoba, this time diamonds.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/diamonds-discovered-1.4012050?cmp=rss

Hold on to your hats!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1275  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 10:32 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
" Nice bit of news..Hope it becomes a substantial find after their preliminary work.
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1276  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 10:40 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,067
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cyro View Post
" Nice bit of news..Hope it becomes a substantial find after their preliminary work.
Don't get your hopes up. All kinds of diamond bearing Kimberlite pipes have been discovered in Saskatchewan in last 25 years. Nothing substantial has ever resulted, although tens of millions have been spent on exploration and even test mines.

The Sask search even attracted DeBeers and other major players. They found some big diamonds, but it still was not enough for them to make the huge investment in a full-fledged mine, which I seem to recall would cost $1.6 billion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1277  
Old Posted Mar 6, 2017, 10:53 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
^ Could be the case here as well, no worries, we'll see if it ever becomes a profitable find several years down the road, if ever.
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1278  
Old Posted Mar 7, 2017, 6:54 PM
Gm0ney Gm0ney is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2016
Posts: 221
The last thing DeBeers wants is a bunch of diamond mines opening up around the world.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1279  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 5:24 PM
bomberjet bomberjet is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2012
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 16,364
Ya they said Manitoba is the last province Between Ontario and Alberta to discover diamonds. They're small, less than 1mm. Further exploration is continuing so who knows.

Similar to Potash. That invisible line that is the Mb/Sask border is like the great divide. Manitoba potash is not a sustainable endeavor as of yet. However ,the Rocanville mine just a stones throw from the Manitoba border is a high producing mine.

So you never know.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1280  
Old Posted Mar 8, 2017, 5:49 PM
Stormer's Avatar
Stormer Stormer is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 8,067
Here is a sample of what Shore Gold has found at its Star Kimberlite property and they still can't get a mine built.

Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:53 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.