Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook
These articles all have it right...but isn't the constitutional amendment to tax commercial properties at different (higher) rate than residential (a measure with full backing by commercial real estate owners and the chamber of commerce) and a corresponding drop in the wage tax aimed at addressing all this? Let's hope it happens.
|
what I found interesting about the article is that Brandywine is investing heavily in Philly while the exec basically says businesses are leaving the city. If that be the case why is brandywine focusing on investing here? Why have they dumped some suburban assets to purchase and develop more in Philly? Also, the assertion that jobs are leaving Philadelphia is flat out false.
As for PA- much of the city's current tax and regulatory structure is related to or limited by the state- which is why it takes an amendment to the constitution just to allow Philly to tax commercial real estate differently from residential. PA is a stagnating state and there are reasons for that. In spite of having a mostly conservative legislature this is not really a pro-growth state.