HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4281  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 4:21 PM
cesar90 cesar90 is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 433
     
     
  #4282  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 4:45 PM
LAsam LAsam is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,952
^ Nice! I really enjoyed your wide shot of downtown and your night time shot of Echo Park. Circa and Oceanwide are really going to be prominent a year from now.
     
     
  #4283  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 7:18 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
     
     
  #4284  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 7:28 PM
Mojeda101's Avatar
Mojeda101 Mojeda101 is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 1,474
Massive. At 647' it'll be among the tallest residential towers in the city. Practically as tall as the 50 story and the 54 story across town. The design could use some tweaking but I approve. I gotta admit, Onni is hella ambitious. They're going all in in Dtla.
     
     
  #4285  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 7:42 PM
colemonkee's Avatar
colemonkee colemonkee is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 9,289
Onni is ambitious, and I applaud them for that. Though this building's fez hat is mysteriously missing its tassel.
     
     
  #4286  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 7:48 PM
Jun's Avatar
Jun Jun is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Posts: 318
Looks good minus that stupid looking...whatever it is.
     
     
  #4287  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 8:27 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by CaliNative View Post
I kind of agree. The exteriors at Metropolis seem a bit cost based, Las Vegas-like (but still better than a parking lot). That said, the 58 story tower will be impressive.

I wonder if builders cut costs in L.A. a bit, and spend the really big bucks in SF & NYC & Chicago & Toronto on the finishing touches & bold designs? The Oceanwide tower in SF is taller and has a better design (in my opinion) than the L.A. version. 900' vs. about 670' and an interesting tapering & faceted design that must cost more. Just an impression.

L.A. needs a really bold statement (I like the Times Mirror project design). Boxy buildings are boring. L.A. has 4 million people--let's get going! Hopefully Measure "S" Nimbys will be defeated & we can take the skyline to the next level.
Ehh, beggars can't be choosers. DTLA isn't SF, Chi, or Manhattan. It's not even the most desirable office or residential market in the region. What we really need is more pedestrian friendly infill, not statement pieces. We still have a long ways to go.

I mean people hate on the architecture of the Vegas strip all the time, but it's high concentration of amenities makes it a great place to be a pedestrian.

Function is much more important than form.
     
     
  #4288  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 10:02 PM
Doctorboffin Doctorboffin is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 400
Don't forget about the 700 footer a block away.
     
     
  #4289  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 10:04 PM
Quixote's Avatar
Quixote Quixote is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2006
Posts: 7,652
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcat23 View Post
What in the world is happening at the top?
     
     
  #4290  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 10:57 PM
black_crow's Avatar
black_crow black_crow is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 569
First Times Mirror Square and now the Onni Group Tower.

Nice proposals, good times.

@cesar90

Impressive video. Thank you.
     
     
  #4291  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 11:19 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,904
Quote:
Originally Posted by ChargerCarl View Post
Ehh, beggars can't be choosers. DTLA isn't SF, Chi, or Manhattan. It's not even the most desirable office or residential market in the region. What we really need is more pedestrian friendly infill, not statement pieces. We still have a long ways to go.

I mean people hate on the architecture of the Vegas strip all the time, but it's high concentration of amenities makes it a great place to be a pedestrian.

Function is much more important than form.
The Strip is a horrible place to be a pedestrian. The blocks are more than super blocks.

The new Onni. Love the height , love the ambition, most of the tower looks interesting but safe design wise, except for that weird addition up top
     
     
  #4292  
Old Posted Jan 25, 2017, 11:26 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Posts: 2,407
Quote:
Originally Posted by LosAngelesSportsFan View Post
The Strip is a horrible place to be a pedestrian. The blocks are more than super blocks.
Revealed preference.
     
     
  #4293  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 12:49 AM
Valyrian Steel's Avatar
Valyrian Steel Valyrian Steel is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 966
Angry

Quote:
Originally Posted by Quixote View Post
What in the world is happening at the top?
The building looks like a giant lipstick, or something worse.
     
     
  #4294  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 1:18 AM
Wilcal Wilcal is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by blackcat23 View Post
I'm beginning to think that Chris Dikeakos is very much a "hit or miss" architect. I wasn't very excited by the "first Onni" on Olive; the second ("Bic lighter") building is okay. I like 1212 Flower, but this one however, seems to be somewhat of a miss. I think that it has something to do with the odd out of proportion top element. His Park/5th was almost a masterpiece compared to the currently designed residential high-rises in DTLA. Question: why not just rehash that design? Many people on this forum loved it, and it was a very handsome and daring design. By the way, I do give an immense amount of credit to Onni (as well as the Chinese developers) they seem to be the only ones with the "guts" to take a risk on DTLA by making such large truly game changing investments. They will be the only ones who will actually change the face of DTLA from what we know today.

Last edited by Wilcal; Jan 26, 2017 at 4:02 PM.
     
     
  #4295  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 1:48 AM
circuitfiend circuitfiend is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 115
Do you think, that perhaps, they might have been inspired by the silhouette of the WG fin? Very similar, really, except with str8 lines.
     
     
  #4296  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 2:40 AM
hughfb3 hughfb3 is offline
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 912
Smile

Quote:
Originally Posted by circuitfiend View Post
Do you think, that perhaps, they might have been inspired by the silhouette of the WG fin? Very similar, really, except with str8 lines.
This one is Wilsire Grand inspired and the Onni Times Mirror twins are Metropolis inspired!!
     
     
  #4297  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 4:53 AM
LA21st LA21st is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2002
Posts: 8,067
LOS ANGELES 1000 S Hill 48 Stories

     
     
  #4298  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 7:50 AM
Spantik's Avatar
Spantik Spantik is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 45
Perhaps the reason for the lopsided spire is to keep room for a roof deck/pool? If
The spire were made out of shiny, clear glass, it would actually be quite beautiful. I also like how theres that one long curtain wall that runs all the way up to the spire, I wish more of the building was like that. It does look a bit awkward thouh, maybe they could put another one on the opposite side to even it out lol.
     
     
  #4299  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 8:40 AM
NativeOrange's Avatar
NativeOrange NativeOrange is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 331
I actually really like it. I'm assuming it's a glass crown at the top since its transparent in the renderings, so if it's to be lit up at night then it's even better. I also didn't notice the alternating floors have those curvy pointed corners. Also the columns every 12 or so floors is a nice touch, IMO.
     
     
  #4300  
Old Posted Jan 26, 2017, 7:38 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Posts: 7,904
To each their own i guess. I just cant get myself to like this one in this form. Im assuming its preliminary and will have refinement, but at this point, its very weird
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:27 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.