I don't find these "my city has better restaurants than yours" arguments to be very productive, particularly when we're comparing TO to MTL.
Unless you're a food reviewer who lives for food, you won't have the time or the expense account to comprehensively sample all the restaurants your city offers. Plus, new restaurants open and close at the drop of a hat; sometimes there are restaurants I want to try and then I wait too long and they're actually gone! And I live in a smaller city, too. When your city is of a certain size and global importance - and both Toronto and Montreal cross this bar - your restaurant scene has little to do with your city's creative environment, and more to do with the fact that, globally, gastronomy has attained a staggering cultural importance that didn't exist even ten years ago. We should realize that this is happening all over the world, and that people in Japan or China or Europe won't pay attention to what's happening in Toronto or Montreal because their own food scene has evolved at a similar pace.
I'm reminded of something Rousseau lamented a while ago: that culture happens in cities, but it doesn't belong to cities anymore. Food is no different. It used to be: Peking duck, Singapore fried rice, Salade Nicoise, Frankfurters, Wieners, Cocido Madrileno are some examples; so is Montreal Smoked Meat. These all harken back to a time when culture was tied to geography, sometimes extending no further than a city neighbourhood, let alone a city or a nation. For better or for worse, we don't live in those times anymore.
Last edited by hipster duck; Dec 24, 2016 at 9:49 PM.
|