HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #10721  
Old Posted Dec 11, 2016, 7:34 PM
CareerShow CareerShow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by YVR Bruce View Post
July-Aug 2007 showed 1 x 73G (ANC) / 1 x 73G (LAS) / 6 x 734/73H (LAX) / 3 x 73G/734 (SFO) / 1 x 734 (SEA) + 11 x DH4/8 (SEA) & 4 x same (PDX)

I believe they may have peaked at appr 13 x 73X/day

Wow and to think now that the only two destinations served are SEAT and PDX. I remember their operations used to be big here but I never thought it was that big. Did they have a pilot base here? I also think they used to fly to PSP.
     
     
  #10722  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 7:01 PM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
More minor Delta adjustments for Summer 2017 but positive nonetheless...

DL boosting YVR-ATL to 3 weekly - red eyes Fri Sat and Sun.
Also YVR-DTW getting an extra flight per week - a Sat night redeye along with the Sat daytime flight.

Next summer, DL will be operating 13 daily flights again but 16 on Saturdays.
It looks like SLC is back to CR7 and CR9 flights. The 319 must have been just a shuffling before it got finalized. But good news regarding more Atlanta flying, I wish this route would go year-round! But with Delta flying to SEA, LAX, SLC, and MSP (all Delta hubs), they probably find it hard to justify
     
     
  #10723  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 7:22 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
It looks like SLC is back to CR7 and CR9 flights. The 319 must have been just a shuffling before it got finalized. But good news regarding more Atlanta flying, I wish this route would go year-round! But with Delta flying to SEA, LAX, SLC, and MSP (all Delta hubs), they probably find it hard to justify
Too bad Air Canada won't do it.
     
     
  #10724  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 8:17 PM
CareerShow CareerShow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 196
Quote:
Originally Posted by trofirhen View Post
Too bad Air Canada won't do it.
I bet we will see AC add a few more US destinations in the next few years, most likely SLC, Houston, one of Washington or Boston, and maybe MSP or Sacramento. It looks like AC will be receiving more than 1 for 1 swaps with the C-series and the 737 vs the A320/E90's.
     
     
  #10725  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 9:29 PM
CareerShow CareerShow is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 196
According to Air Routes China Southern reverting back to 788 in March.
http://www.routesonline.com/news/38/airl...long-haul-service-changes-as-of-11dec16/
     
     
  #10726  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 10:10 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
CZ CAN-YVR-MEX is definitely starting next April. Expect an announcement soon.

Expect something from Interjet soonish too! YVR-MEX will be their Vancouver launch route.
Strange today airlineroute reported they're ditching the 777 following winter and putting the 787 back on the route. Though this isn't the first time they've done that only to put the 777 back on. They seem to be really all over the place with their equipment announcements.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post

DL boosting YVR-ATL to 3 weekly - red eyes Fri Sat and Sun.
Also YVR-DTW getting an extra flight per week - a Sat night redeye along with the Sat daytime flight.

Next summer, DL will be operating 13 daily flights again but 16 on Saturdays.
Hmm, will that YVR-ATL continue to be a 757? Love seeing that come into YVR.

Inching closer to actually serving the YVR-ATL market, still too little and too seasonal to actually be of much value though.
     
     
  #10727  
Old Posted Dec 12, 2016, 11:47 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Strange today airlineroute reported they're ditching the 777 following winter and putting the 787 back on the route. Though this isn't the first time they've done that only to put the 777 back on. They seem to be really all over the place with their equipment announcements.

Hmm, will that YVR-ATL continue to be a 757? Love seeing that come into YVR.

Inching closer to actually serving the YVR-ATL market, still too little and too seasonal to actually be of much value though.
What about Boston? Statistics have it that it's self-sustaing in pax # and a destination like that should be able to fit in a respectable % of J Class, too, would it not?
     
     
  #10728  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 12:10 AM
MalcolmTucker MalcolmTucker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 11,596
^ It has to compete against virtually anytime departures of single transfer services across numerous airports and airlines, with almost all of the connections onward from Boston being backtracks.

Hard to be competitive on that basis, earning ones own keep for a long flight vs. getting a freebie for some of the route via hubbing.
     
     
  #10729  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 12:23 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,076
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Strange today airlineroute reported they're ditching the 777 following winter and putting the 787 back on the route. Though this isn't the first time they've done that only to put the 777 back on. They seem to be really all over the place with their equipment announcements.
If they are indeed launching CAN-YVR-MEX, then the change for CAN-YVR would probably still pending... I think CAN-YVR for S17 were never changed from 787 to 777?

I wonder where does CZ got their extra 3x weekly frequency... Did they bought them off CA cargo and HU??
     
     
  #10730  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 12:23 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by MalcolmTucker View Post
^ It has to compete against virtually anytime departures of single transfer services across numerous airports and airlines, with almost all of the connections onward from Boston being backtracks.

Hard to be competitive on that basis, earning ones own keep for a long flight vs. getting a freebie for some of the route via hubbing.
I think the one weird variable in all of this is what happens when Air Canada opens up service to Melbourne. For the Australia flights they have one aircraft come in from Newark, a second from Toronto. Where will the third aircraft come from. Probably a destination that could fill a widebody both from passenger count and cargo. I don't know enough about the Boston market to tell if that fits the bill or not.
     
     
  #10731  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 12:52 AM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,131
Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
I think the one weird variable in all of this is what happens when Air Canada opens up service to Melbourne. For the Australia flights they have one aircraft come in from Newark, a second from Toronto. Where will the third aircraft come from. Probably a destination that could fill a widebody both from passenger count and cargo. I don't know enough about the Boston market to tell if that fits the bill or not.
No way we go from 0 service to a 787. That aircraft will just pop into the usual YVR-YYZ widebody rotation.

Boston is a weird one though, it's long but serviceable with a 737 or A320, and appears to have the O&D to support at bare minimum partial week service. According to the statscan data it should be able to fill 5 flights a day with O&D alone. Adding in connecting pax one would think daily is achievable, at least in the summer.

I'm honestly surprised Delta hasn't hit that one up, both to service the route and to funnel YVR pax into Logan's Europe departures, both on its own metal and its SkyTeam partners.

Gotta think once AC receives its C-series planes the route is a no brainer daily. That and MIA.
     
     
  #10732  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 12:56 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,076
Maybe rotate it with another ULH route... something like this....

Code:
2300 YVR - MEL 1030+2
1240 MEL - YVR 0840
1040 YVR - SIN 1940+1
2200 SIN - YVR 2030
Hmm... that works out well, isn't it? Although the flight to SIN got bad connection time.. besides some trans-con redeye flights...
     
     
  #10733  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 1:11 AM
rxp rxp is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 111
     
     
  #10734  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 2:36 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,740
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Maybe rotate it with another ULH route... something like this....

Code:
2300 YVR - MEL 1030+2
1240 MEL - YVR 0840
1040 YVR - SIN 1940+1
2200 SIN - YVR 2030
Hmm... that works out well, isn't it? Although the flight to SIN got bad connection time.. besides some trans-con redeye flights...
Interesting, that does slot in nicely. Probably makes for some reasonable connections at both ends.
     
     
  #10735  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 5:34 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by zahav View Post
It looks like SLC is back to CR7 and CR9 flights. The 319 must have been just a shuffling before it got finalized. But good news regarding more Atlanta flying, I wish this route would go year-round! But with Delta flying to SEA, LAX, SLC, and MSP (all Delta hubs), they probably find it hard to justify
You are right... back to Delta Connection... That didn't last long

DL's footprint at YVR has become impressive.

Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Strange today airlineroute reported they're ditching the 777 following winter and putting the 787 back on the route. Though this isn't the first time they've done that only to put the 777 back on. They seem to be really all over the place with their equipment announcements.

Hmm, will that YVR-ATL continue to be a 757? Love seeing that come into YVR.

Inching closer to actually serving the YVR-ATL market, still too little and too seasonal to actually be of much value though.
Yeah wouldn't pay too much attention to the CZ's flip flop they've now been here long enough to see there is a default pattern. My source says it should flip back again to the 77W so probably won't see the the 788 on that route again.

Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
If they are indeed launching CAN-YVR-MEX, then the change for CAN-YVR would probably still pending...
Something like that

Quote:
Originally Posted by rxp View Post

Johnny: Singapore to YVR?
That would be nice! Wouldn't it? Interesting read... quite a lot of the info in that article was discussed a few months back.

Quote:
Originally Posted by casper View Post
Interesting, that does slot in nicely. Probably makes for some reasonable connections at both ends.
That would be nice! Wouldn't it?
     
     
  #10736  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 7:22 AM
zahav zahav is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 2,052
Quote:
Originally Posted by LeftCoaster View Post
Strange today airlineroute reported they're ditching the 777 following winter and putting the 787 back on the route. Though this isn't the first time they've done that only to put the 777 back on. They seem to be really all over the place with their equipment announcements.



Hmm, will that YVR-ATL continue to be a 757? Love seeing that come into YVR.

Inching closer to actually serving the YVR-ATL market, still too little and too seasonal to actually be of much value though.
It will be with a 737-800. Which is no slouch, the -800 and -900 series are almost comparable to 757s. We are going to see lots of upper series 737s, both DL and AS are putting 737-900s to YVR for some routes, and UA hasn't yet but they are always changing their a/c scheds and usually have a -900 here in the summer. AA is using 737-800s on twice daily PHX and DFW routes, and of course DL and Westjet
     
     
  #10737  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 9:41 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,076
AC had recently re-numbered YVR-DEL flight to AC44/45 starting Oct 2017 (YYZ-DEL flight will be renumbered to AC42/43 on May 1st, and then YYZ-BOM will be AC46/47)

It's a sign that its coming back next winter at least, right?

With the recent shuffling, now it becoming more clear that AC start to group routes by numbers. They seems to save 4 numbers for 2 routes in South Pacific... hmmm....
     
     
  #10738  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 10:22 AM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,465
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
AC had recently re-numbered YVR-DEL flight to AC44/45 starting Oct 2017 (YYZ-DEL flight will be renumbered to AC42/43 on May 1st, and then YYZ-BOM will be AC46/47)

It's a sign that its coming back next winter at least, right?

With the recent shuffling, now it becoming more clear that AC start to group routes by numbers. They seems to save 4 numbers for 2 routes in South Pacific... hmmm....
AC33/34 YVR-SYD-YVR
AC35/36 YVR-BNE-YVR
AC37/38 YVR-MEL-YVR hmmmmm
     
     
  #10739  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 2:50 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,045
Quote:
Originally Posted by Johnny Aussie View Post
AC33/34 YVR-SYD-YVR
AC35/36 YVR-BNE-YVR
AC37/38 YVR-MEL-YVR hmmmmm
May I ask why "Melbourne hmmmmm?" Does that mean it may not happen?
Or does that mean that it seems to be on the horizon, or what? I'd love to see a flight YVR - MELBOURNE.
     
     
  #10740  
Old Posted Dec 13, 2016, 3:11 PM
Johnny Aussie's Avatar
Johnny Aussie Johnny Aussie is offline
G'day
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Melbourne, VIC
Posts: 4,465
AC further boosting transborder

Air Canada's latest summer 2017 schedule update has the following additions:

LAX will have a 6th daily flight added - a late evening departure
SAN will in fact have a second daily evening flight added for the summer

The additional LAX flight will be operated by 320s and SAN of course on Jazz CRAs.

So yet even more AC expansion out of YVR next summer! 14 daily flights on AC just to California next summer.

Last edited by Johnny Aussie; Dec 13, 2016 at 3:28 PM.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:41 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.