HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals


    Oceanwide Center I in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • San Francisco Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
San Francisco Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #441  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 12:02 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
It's done--ground officially broken: http://sf.curbed.com/2016/12/8/13890490/...aking-foster-partners-heller-manus-china

Seems like we have a friend from China:

Quote:
Luo Linquan, the Chinese Consul General to San Francisco, repeated the mayor’s refrain, calling the imminent high-rises “a good model for the city’s prosperity and relationship with China.”

He added that his initial disappointment that Oceanwide wasn’t allowed to eclipse Salesforce Tower in height was mitigated upon reflecting that the world’s second-largest economy was enabling the city’s second-tallest building.


For gosh sakes, SLAP A SPIRE ON IT and make us and the Chinese happy, and Angelenos everywhere disturbed.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #442  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 12:08 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #443  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 2:48 AM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by Pedestrian View Post
For gosh sakes, SLAP A SPIRE ON IT and make us and the Chinese happy, and Angelenos everywhere disturbed.

That sure sounds like the attitude of someone that could care less about height contests

Great news, so can this be moved to U/C now?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #444  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 3:17 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,457
Welcome to the 900-footer club San Francisco

Although I don't like the party walls in the back, the overall tower is gorgeous.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #445  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 3:46 AM
fimiak's Avatar
fimiak fimiak is offline
Build Baby Build
 
Join Date: Sep 2010
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 969
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1977 View Post
Also, a new rendering of the base of the hotel portion - Waldorf Astoria



and another view of how it looks within skyline:


http://www.sfchronicle.com/bayarea/place...ne-the-skyline-and-the-city-10778750.php
Almost too nice for Mission St...this needed a repost for a new page.
__________________
San Francisco Projects List ∞ The city that knows how ∞ 2017 ∞ 884,363 ∞ ~2030 ∞ 1,000,000
San Francisco Projects ThreadOakland Projects ThreadOceanwide Center - 275M/901'
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #446  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 5:22 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post
That sure sounds like the attitude of someone that could care less about height contests
It's endless and boring debates on the subject I dislike. A definitive win would end them.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #447  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 5:25 AM
edwards's Avatar
edwards edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rincon Hill
Posts: 364
Was at the ceremony - one of the speakers mentioned piles extending 400 ft into bedrock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #448  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 5:31 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by fimiak View Post
Almost too nice for Mission St...this needed a repost for a new page.
Mission St. is not the Mission St. of 10 years ago. For one thing, my Chinese lunch place is long gone. But it is now the home of the St. Regis Hotel, several premier highrise residential buildings (near 3rd St, existing and under construction and, yeah, Millenium Tower), Salesforce Tower (and the company's other 2 buildings on the same corner, 350, 530 and 550 Mission plus what some consider one of SF's nicest (if nowhere near tallest) office buildings, the local JP Morgan-Chase HQ.

Frankly, Mission is probably now THE best business address in SF--maybe better than Montgomery St. which is so "used-to-be". When was the last first class new building built on Montgomery?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #449  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 5:39 AM
edwards's Avatar
edwards edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rincon Hill
Posts: 364
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #450  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 6:14 AM
pseudolus pseudolus is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Mission Terrace, SF
Posts: 708
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1977 View Post
Also, a new rendering of the base of the hotel portion - Waldorf Astoria


They left out the phalanx of armed guards chasing off the homeless.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #451  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 7:36 AM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by edwards View Post
New York is so 20th century

I would have thought the Waldorf Astoria occupy the sophisticated Foster tower rather than the bland Heller Manus box.

Last edited by mt_climber13; Dec 9, 2016 at 7:50 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #452  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 8:32 AM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
^^I agree with your opinion of the Heller Manus tower but it has gotten a fair amount of praise from others, mainly for the projecting box windows.

Personally, I think Heller Manus just got all coked up and drained their creativity into 181 Fremont. They may not have anything left (and who would have thought they had anything before we saw that one?)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #453  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 8:32 AM
ozone's Avatar
ozone ozone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2004
Location: Sacramento California
Posts: 2,270
Glad to see this going up. I was in Shanghai last week and was reading an article about how the Chinese government is now trying to rein in Chinese foreign investment. How effective they will be is another matter and I assume they are too far along in the process to put the kibosh on this project but the sooner construction gets underway the better.

@pseudolus - this is not being built at 6th and Mission.

Last edited by ozone; Dec 9, 2016 at 10:45 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #454  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 3:49 PM
mt_climber13 mt_climber13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: San Diego
Posts: 1,287
Quote:
Originally Posted by edwards View Post
Was at the ceremony - one of the speakers mentioned piles extending 400 ft into bedrock.
Wow.. weren't SF tower's piles only 200-300' deep? And the deepest piles ever in the country?

Based on SF across the street I'm guessing this will be 2 years of excavation, pile driving before this thing reaches ground level. But then again didn't they run into some issues and set them back a few months? Also, this is not next to the terminal so maybe excavation won't have to be such a delicate process.

And based on this model above


The Heller Manus tower looks much taller than 636' (50 Fremont in front of it is 600') so perhaps it will be closer to 700'+? Or they just made it taller in the model so it would stand out more. Or it could just be the perspective of the tilt.

Congrats on another in-f***ing-credible tower SF
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #455  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 4:44 PM
Justbuildit Justbuildit is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2016
Posts: 173
Will this tower have a cement core like Salesforce or is it like 181 Fremont?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #456  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 6:34 PM
Pedestrian's Avatar
Pedestrian Pedestrian is offline
Elite Member
 
Join Date: Dec 2016
Location: San Francisco
Posts: 24,128
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post
Wow.. weren't SF tower's piles only 200-300' deep? And the deepest piles ever in the country?
Yes

Quote:
Based on SF across the street I'm guessing this will be 2 years of excavation, pile driving before this thing reaches ground level. But then again didn't they run into some issues and set them back a few months? Also, this is not next to the terminal so maybe excavation won't have to be such a delicate process.
Yes. I actually spoke to one of the workmen back then who told they messed something up which was causing delay because it had to be redone but I'm not sure of the details. One quibble: Piles like these aren't driven, they are poured in place.

Quote:
Drilled piles

Also called caissons, drilled shafts, drilled piers, Cast-in-drilled-hole piles (CIDH piles) or Cast-in-Situ piles, a borehole is drilled into the ground, then concrete (and often some sort of reinforcing) is placed into the borehole to form the pile. Rotary boring techniques allow larger diameter piles than any other piling method and permit pile construction through particularly dense or hard strata. Construction methods depend on the geology of the site; in particular, whether boring is to be undertaken in 'dry' ground conditions or through water-saturated strata - i.e. 'wet boring'. Casing is often used when the sides of the borehole are likely to slough off before concrete is poured.

For end-bearing piles, drilling continues until the borehole has extended a sufficient depth (socketing) into a sufficiently strong layer. Depending on site geology, this can be a rock layer, or hardpan, or other dense, strong layers. Both the diameter of the pile and the depth of the pile are highly specific to the ground conditions, loading conditions, and nature of the project. Pile depths may vary substantially across a project if the bearing layer is not level.

Drilled piles can be tested using a variety of methods to verify the pile integrity during installation.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Deep_foundation
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #457  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 6:41 PM
tech12's Avatar
tech12 tech12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Location: Oakland
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post

The Heller Manus tower looks much taller than 636'
lol don't get too excited, it's just the perspective...

Quote:
Originally Posted by wakamesalad View Post
Or it could just be the perspective of the tilt.
looks like you already answered your own question though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #458  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 8:23 PM
Mr Saturn64's Avatar
Mr Saturn64 Mr Saturn64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Philly
Posts: 1,128
Wow. San Fran's comin' up. This is one fine building as well. Not as good as 181 Fremont, but quite formidable in its own right.

It seems like the majority of the cities in this country are getting new tallest buildings, so I went to the diagrams to look. San Francisco and Philadelphia are definitely joining the 1000-footer club, and Dallas, Seattle, and Miami have their first 1000-footers proposed. Tampa also apparently has a 900 footer proposed (first I've heard of it) Seems like a really good time for us skyscraper enthusiasts.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #459  
Old Posted Dec 9, 2016, 8:49 PM
SFView SFView is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 1,092
^^^Yes, and also don't forget Los Angeles.

Anyway...
Quote:
Originally Posted by Justbuildit View Post
Will this tower have a cement core like Salesforce or is it like 181 Fremont?
Go back to page 21 of this thread. You will see that there will be two separate cores at the outside west face of the 910 foot tower.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #460  
Old Posted Dec 10, 2016, 4:22 AM
edwards's Avatar
edwards edwards is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Rincon Hill
Posts: 364
Quote:
Wow.. weren't SF tower's piles only 200-300' deep? And the deepest piles ever in the country?
Oceanwide's will be 'the deepest on the West Coast of North America.'
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > Proposals
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:33 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.