Quote:
Originally Posted by ethereal_reality
Hoss, I couldn't help but notice the rather large Mary Mitchell property at the top of your baist map section.
1914 baist, Originally posted by HossC
Do we know anything about her?
__
|
I wonder if it's the affluent Mary Mitchell of the following:
--
Los Angeles Times January 5, 1908 (via ProQuest via CSULB Library):
WOMAN BUYS INCOME PROPERTY ON HILLTOP.
[large but too faint picture]
Apartment House on South Hope Street.
which has been sold by Edward D. Silent and Frank J. Thomas for a consideration of $18,000. The buyer is Mrs. Mary Mitchell. The property consists of a lot 40x90 feet improved with the five-story frame structure shown above. This was built three years ago, and contains forty-five rooms. It is said to be a good income proposition. The deal was made through the Herbert L. Cornish Company.
--
Los Angeles Times September 5, 1909 (via ProQuest via CSULB Library):
A NOTABLE DOG
Long story relating that Lucy, a “little brown dog,” who it seems was about to be put to sleep by the dog-catcher, “when taken to the park [Eastlake Park] to see if she would adopt the little lions as her own babies” (it was feared that the over-fretful lion mother, named Kitty, would have accidentally crushed the lionlings in trying to hide them). Now, Lucy, it seems, was a little brown dog in more ways than one, as she had escaped from the house of her mistress Mrs. Brown (residence on Henry St.) while Mrs. B. was on a visit to the beach “last spring.” To make a long story short, Lucy and the lionlets liked each other very much, and would play each day in Eastlake Park . . . where one fine day Mrs. Brown happened to visit the park and spotted her long-lost canine. All ended well, with Lucy not only again living in the Brown home on Henry St., not only visiting the lioninos (Mark and Cleo) daily, but also being the recipient of “a pretty silver plate which has been presented to the little dog” . . . by Mrs. Mary Mitchell.
The
Times has various society-page stories which allegedly mention Mrs. Mary Mitchell, who evidently was of the stratum of society at which one would expect just since a thing; but Society stories are maddeningly long with scores of names which yield nothing more than the name and that said name was at some social event with scores of other names...which my patience or indeed impatience keeps me from scrutinizing and adding to the above. There are also other stories in this era of various Mary Mitchells (a Gypsy! a Music Teacher! etc. etc.) who don't seem to be our Mary Mitchell.