Fun fact that nobody seems to be paying attention to:
Artis REIT is the city's biggest heritage landlord. As in owning, operating, preserving, fixing up. They KNOW how much work goes into a heritage building (and most here don't).
So here we have a major dump of a hotel with two problems.
1) It's a dump
2) It's a crack den. At the foot of Portage and Main, and Artis' flagship property.
Why is anyone surprised that Artis would not want heritage designation awarded? It would only prevent anything purposeful from happening to the property and KEEP all that riff raff (that's fun to say) right at their doorstep.
Anyone with a home keeps their driveway clean, and Artis can't because of the Vendome.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ando
|
Pollard is doing a great thing. To assume him and others can whimsically transform any property into a gem repeatedly is misguided. As mentioned, Artis knows what's involved here, and they know that the designation would delay any progress. They have been heritage preservers, not butchers, in the past.
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
^ I am extremely gratified to hear that serious thought is being given to improving Fort Street. It's horrendous how the commercial hub of Winnipeg basically presents as a walled off fortress to Fort Street, with a bunch of parking lots and underutilized buildings on the west side of the street. There is a lot of potential along that block.
That said, what do Bel/Albo/Martens intend to do with the Vendome, assuming that they acquire it? Demolition for a new tower is one thing, demolition for surface parking is quite another. Sounds like they're being a little vague.
|
They're vague because they probably have ideas and not plans. They'll get around to it sometime soon, but at minimum it gives them control to clean up that mess.
They'd probably give more details if they had them, but there' not crime in not having plans in my opinion. That property is a mess.
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
^ I think we've all had enough of developers demolishing buildings based on vague plans that never materialize. That said, the proponents of this Fort Street thing aren't actually asking to demolish anything yet.
|
As for my opinion? In a worst case scenario, a surface lot would obviously be a temporary solution that SOLVES BOTH of the problems listed above. Artis isn't a passive landowner by design, so I'm comfortable with a surface lot because in the worst case, we'll see something new in 5 years.
If it can be maintained and cleaned, that's also great, or best case scenario actually. But we have to stop getting in our own way... Anything, including vacant space slated for *someday* development, is better for the street, the city, and nearby developments.