Quote:
Originally Posted by roger1818
Very strange! This means passengers who just miss a train will have to cross over to the other platform. In my experience, at terminal stations the train will drop off passengers on one platform, continue a couple hundred yards further down the track, and then switch tracks to the other platform. This has the added advantage that if the train has finished its last run, no one will board the train.
|
It's also like that at Blair, but Blair is a center platform station. But I also agree that the trains should run further out of the terminal station (especially considering the path they are already taking for stage 2 expansion is going to continue off the track from the terminal stations) and then come right back. Also, I don't get how they are going to manage if both tracks at terminal station will be heading east/west and trains will be running at every 3m!
Here is an example:
|Track 1|Track 2|
|- ---- -|- ---- -|
|- ---- -|- ---- -|
Train is already at track 2
Train comes to track 1 and empty's the train while track 2 is boarding. Takes a good 4 minutes to switch side of the train (Considering the train is 98m long).
Train on track 2 leaves.
Meanwhile, a train is already waiting at the station for an empty track.
If we have a train waiting at all times, it wont be an efficient service having to wait 2 minutes 20m away from the station for a train to leave to empty space for the next.
I might be wrong, but that is how I have it calculated in my head.