HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9081  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 5:09 PM
Stonemans_rowJ's Avatar
Stonemans_rowJ Stonemans_rowJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hilltop
Posts: 391
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
I may not be a photo taker but I am a photo watcher.

PIVOT... Looking very nice.

"Sprawling suburbs, not tall towers, lead to affordable housing, study finds"
Sept 14, 2016 By Laura Kusisto - MarketWatch

I assume nobody is surprised by this. Denver is among those in Exhibit A for unaffordability.
So it doesn't take into account transportation costs at all? H&T Affordability?
__________________
JP
     
     
  #9082  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 5:14 PM
Stonemans_rowJ's Avatar
Stonemans_rowJ Stonemans_rowJ is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Hilltop
Posts: 391
__________________
JP
     
     
  #9083  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 5:17 PM
ejwill04 ejwill04 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
That Streetsblog podcast was good. I agree that we should hire him to work with our city!
     
     
  #9084  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 5:48 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonemans_rowJ View Post
So it doesn't take into account transportation costs at all? H&T Affordability?
True, it's an article about housing; it's not an article about transportation.

It is interesting to observe the great migration into states below the Mason-Dixon Line. Multi-nodal development does work well for growing families with kids who need to get to soccer practice and so forth. It shouldn't be a surprise that the SEC has become the dominant athletic conference.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonemans_rowJ View Post
Such an amazing story. Millennium Tower is a high end tower too. I did post about it a few weeks ago but that was before things started to heat up. Curbed San Francisco has been obviously following this too.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #9085  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 6:59 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,383
Get your beer here


CREDIT: KNOWLESGALLERY - FOTOLIA/CHARLES KNOWLES via The Telegraph
"The second fastest growing city in the country after Austin, Denver is chasing down the Texan capital in the cool stakes too"

"Is Denver becoming America's coolest city?"
14 SEPTEMBER 2016 by Jonathan Thompson, travel writer - The Telegraph
Quote:
The first permanent building in Denver wasn’t a church, a home or a bank; it was a saloon. Now, more than 150 years after gold prospectors first began to arrive, Denverites still clearly love their beer.

Simply strolling or cycling around the city (Denverites love bikes as much as they love beer) gives you an idea of the remarkable amount of choice here for hop-heads.
Kind of fun to read a view from across the pond by a UK source
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #9086  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 10:08 PM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive View Post
True, it's an article about housing; it's not an article about transportation.
They're related. Unless, like Kotkin, you have an agenda.

Anyway, while there could be some truth to the notion that cities have to expand horizontally to remain affordable, there's absolutely zero truth to the parochial American assumption that horizontal growth has to mean leap-frog sprawl. Walkable urbanism is not inherently more expensive than sprawl (in fact it's inherently cheaper); it's only expensive because there's more demand for it than there is supply. Paris' suburbs are more walkable, more dense, and more affordable than central Denver.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads
     
     
  #9087  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 10:08 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by ddvmke View Post
Article posted today to update on potential Denver Housing Authority HQ relocation.

I would love to see more varied use near this station, other than the affordable housing and single family homes we see now. Seems like a great station to further connect into the fabric of the neighborhood by extending commercial/retail/cultural corridor from Santa Fe along 10th Ave to the station, and someday even over the track to the decommissioned Burnham rail yards.
That article was an interesting read and your ideas sound good too.

There has been a proactive effort to preserve the La Alma/Lincoln Park neighborhood for its history and original character. HUD et al developed an allergy to high density affordable housing from watching too many residential towers waste away and be imploded. I really like their current approach to nicer, sustainable projects. Found a fun article from 2014 in Westword.

"Why Denver's La Alma/Lincoln Park Neighborhood Deserves to Be a "Great Place"
OCTOBER 3, 2014 by Melanie Asmar - Westword
Quote:
The La Alma/Lincoln Park neighborhood was named one of the nation's Ten Great Neighorhoods this week by the American Planning Association. I happen to live in the neighborhood...

The APA sings La Alma/Lincoln Park's praises by noting that it's "one of Denver's oldest neighborhoods, with a strong sense of heritage and community." The neighborhood has Latino roots -- and the organization mentions that La Alma/Lincoln Park has retained much of that culture while growing into a transit-friendly, artsy, park-y place with a variety of housing options and land uses that's close to downtown.

La Alma/Lincoln Park via Westword
Quote:
Originally Posted by Interzen View Post
It does seem like a better use could be found for the parcel with closest proximity to the station (directly adjacent). I was disappointed to read "The first five floors would be mostly parking space."
Irony of ironies, eh? I guess one of the big issues with their current site is the lack of parking. Apparently it was "once bitten twice shy."


Quote:
Originally Posted by PLANSIT View Post
^DHA's next focus is Sun Valley.
That should so much fun to follow. Awesome location now, special opportunity.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #9088  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 10:14 PM
Dogpatch Dogpatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Chicago
Posts: 182
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonemans_rowJ View Post

Wow! Great article. Thanks for posting!
     
     
  #9089  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 10:38 PM
CherryCreek's Avatar
CherryCreek CherryCreek is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Location: Denver
Posts: 897
Quote:
Originally Posted by Stonemans_rowJ View Post


Wasn't the Beauvallon simply some crappy stucco that had to be replaced? A sinking and tilting 50 story building, now THAT'S a serious defect!!
     
     
  #9090  
Old Posted Sep 14, 2016, 10:45 PM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,383
Currently we see...


The I Candi Car Wash on Park Avenue West in Five Points. (Kevin J. Beaty/Denverite)

"17-story building proposed for I Candi Carwash site in Five Points"
September 14, 2016 by Adrian D. Garcia - Denverite
Quote:
The Denver construction and architecture firm Oyster International dropped $1.6 million last month on a former car wash in Five Points.

The firm plans to build a 17-story building on the property at 838 W. Park Ave., said Tom Monks, principal broker at Equity Commercial Real Estate.
What's it to be?
Quote:
Oyster International hasn’t submitted a formal proposal for the property yet, but a conceptual plan shows a multi-family building with about 130 condo units, according to the Denver Community Planning and Development department.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #9091  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2016, 5:28 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by comoneymaker View Post
I could have sworn it said 499 yesterday. Guess I was to tired.
Not a problem... but I still think you're confused a little. IIRC, it's not the number of pages but the number of comments. Look to the upper right hand corner of each comment to see the total number. When that reaches 10,000 then BAM. For example your own comment is #9192

Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
They're related. Unless, like Kotkin, you have an agenda.

Anyway, while there could be some truth to the notion that cities have to expand horizontally to remain affordable, there's absolutely zero truth to the parochial American assumption that horizontal growth has to mean leap-frog sprawl. Walkable urbanism is not inherently more expensive than sprawl (in fact it's inherently cheaper); it's only expensive because there's more demand for it than there is supply. Paris' suburbs are more walkable, more dense, and more affordable than central Denver.
No particular agenda on my part. In fact I was preferring to avoid the whole urban vs suburban debate. MarketWatch only had the summary; the main article was in the WSJ. If it had an agenda you'll have to tell me bcuz I didn't read it.

I mentioned the migration to the south. Much of this is industrial related. They tend to be in more competitive businesses for which costs are important. There's a reason for why Boeing chose to build planes in South Carolina. There's a different reason for why they chose Chicago for their HQ.

Interesting piece in Bloomberg recently entitled: Conditions Are Ripe for a Big-City Exodus No, I didn't really buy into this but it did make some good points. There is potential for some truth to the idea.

I'm also part way through JLL's 64 page mid-year tech analysis. Things are changing although tech continues to be a powerful engine. Stronger tech companies who need to grow their back-office operations are more likely looking for more affordable markets. This is a strength of Phoenix for example. PBJ just wrote of the pending announcement of San Francisco-based McKesson developing a 2,000 worker regional operations center. Other tech companies want to expand in established tech oriented often urban markets.

The lower 48 states have many dynamic moving parts that keep this country powering forward. It's all very fascinating, really.

As to affordability, the fact that Denver isn't experiencing any sprawl driven by starter homes as was typical of past cycles is why not only downtown but the whole metro area has become less affordable as Denver continues to experience healthy growth. It's not just the urban center.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #9092  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2016, 4:09 PM
RyanD's Avatar
RyanD RyanD is offline
Fast. Fun. Frequent.
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Location: Denver, Colorado
Posts: 2,988
__________________
DenverInfill
DenverUrbanism
--------------------
Latest Photo Threads: Los Angeles | New Orleans | Denver: 2014 Megathread | Denver Time-Lapse Project For more photos check out: My Website and My Flickr Photostream
     
     
  #9093  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2016, 9:24 PM
twister244 twister244 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 5,264
Hey all,

Long time lurker (10+ years), first time poster. Originally from Iowa, ended up in the Denver area a bit over a year ago. I live in Freight Residences (TAXI), and received an email regarding the FLIGHT office building breaking ground on 9/29. Haven't seen it discussed anywhere on here, nor on Denver Infill. Not sure how large the space is, but the rendering shows it to be slightly larger than the Freight Residence building. The parking lot that was in front of FR has now been torn up and excavation equipment has been moving Earth around for two weeks now. Love seeing TAXI expand!

EDIT:
Per the email, the building will be approximately 140,000 squared feet. Also, it appears construction is imminent, or even underway at the Zeppelin Gauge site at 35th and Wazee. The existing site has been demolished and 35th is now closed at the site.

Last edited by twister244; Sep 16, 2016 at 1:51 AM.
     
     
  #9094  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2016, 11:07 PM
Fritzdude Fritzdude is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 1,006
Quote:
Originally Posted by twister244 View Post
Hey all,

Long time lurker (10+ years), first time poster. !
Welcome Twister! Just across the tracks on my side of RiNo, another development is underway as well, which I haven't seen discussed. At the moment, the entire block at 26th and Arapahoe is getting torn up.
     
     
  #9095  
Old Posted Sep 15, 2016, 11:54 PM
ejwill04 ejwill04 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2010
Posts: 48
^^^
Fritzdude,

The S*Park townhome and condo project may be the one you've seen.



http://liveatspark.com/
     
     
  #9096  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 1:33 AM
Cirrus's Avatar
Cirrus Cirrus is offline
cities|transit|croissants
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Washington, DC
Posts: 18,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by bcp
per built door, multifamily / urban IS more expensive for the developer and the buyer.
Because in the US more of the suburban development costs are externalized, because the regulatory environment makes it hard to build in the city, because current urban development is largely a luxury product, and because of supply and demand. And because the center of town is inherently more expensive. None of these factors are inherent to walkable urbanism independently. Walkable urbanism is not required to be in the center of town.

The cheapest way to house large numbers of people, all outside factors left outside, would be a favela/shantytown. The next cheapest would be with 5-story wood-frame walk-up tenements at 50,000 people per square mile. Both of those are extremely walkable and urban. We don't build either of them in this country today because we've decided not to, not because they're more expensive than a car-dependent subdivision. Meanwhile, it remains true that those Paris suburbs are more walkable, more dense, and more affordable than most central US cities.

So OK, it was an oversimplification to say the only reason walkable urbanism is more expensive is supply and demand. There are other factors at play, particularly within the US as of 2016. But they're not because of walkability, which is more efficient in virtually every way; they're just a reflection of the regulatory process we've adopted and could change at any time given the desire and will.

Quote:
Originally Posted by TakeFive
No particular agenda on my part.
Didn't mean to imply so. Kotkin has one.
__________________
writing | twitter | bluesky | flickr | instagram | ssp photo threads

Last edited by Cirrus; Sep 16, 2016 at 2:24 AM.
     
     
  #9097  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 4:18 AM
TakeFive's Avatar
TakeFive TakeFive is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 8,383
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cirrus View Post
The cheapest way to house large numbers of people, all outside factors left outside, would be a favela/shantytown.
I learned something new today so I'm celebrating.

Favela in Rio de Janeiro City of God

American President Barack Obama visits Rio de Janeiro's City of God. Photo credit: English Online
Not sure about "development costs are externalized" but I see that California vegetables are used as one example. Worthy of thoughtful discussion? Sure. But little or nothing to do with real world, real time decision making it would seem.

Real world, most southern states still have a significant competitive edge when it comes to costs/taxes. It's how Texas was able to buy their way to the 2nd largest state by GSP (gross state product). New York is managing to hang close though. The U.S. heartland/rustbelt will likely be saved by luring Chinese investment and looks to become the center for the Chinese auto industry.

Keep an eye out and one ear to the ground for a Big City exodus.
__________________
Cool... Denver has reached puberty.
     
     
  #9098  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 4:27 AM
comoneymaker's Avatar
comoneymaker comoneymaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wash park Hood!(Denver)
Posts: 2,459
Quote:
Originally Posted by ejwill04 View Post
^^^
Fritzdude,

The S*Park townhome and condo project may be the one you've seen.



http://liveatspark.com/
Am I reading this wrong or are you calling that project The Sh*t Park?
__________________
I love Denver
     
     
  #9099  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 5:13 AM
mhays mhays is offline
Never Dell
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 21,095
Urbanity has some huge advantages cost-wise.

You don't need a spare bedroom because there's a hotel nearby. You don't need a big dining room because there are restaurants, and your building might have a party kitchen. You can even rent space in a nearby workshop for your hobbies.

Utilities can be cheaper because you share walls, and possibly because you don't have as much volume to heat, light, etc.

And then you get transportation's personal and public costs, as well as the cost of every other sort of public infrastructure.
__________________
"Alot" has never been a word.
     
     
  #9100  
Old Posted Sep 16, 2016, 5:14 AM
comoneymaker's Avatar
comoneymaker comoneymaker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2004
Location: Wash park Hood!(Denver)
Posts: 2,459
Looking back I think a outdoor Amphitheater about the size of Fiddler's would be great in this area.


Something the downtown area needs. Or maybe it can get tied in with the Denver Performing Arts redevelopment. Which ever
__________________
I love Denver
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:01 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.