HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2461  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 4:40 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,728


mapsgoogle.com





Dean Paul De Leon, facebook.com




     
     
  #2462  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 5:18 PM
Easy's Avatar
Easy Easy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Location: Los Angeles, CA
Posts: 1,598
So last week a lane was removed on Figueroa going north between Venice and Pico. It was remarked and doesn't look related to any building construction so my guess is My Figueroa is starting. It does add time to my silver line commute. It's going to be ugly when bball and hockey start back. I'll have to take the blue line.
     
     
  #2463  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 6:16 PM
caligrad's Avatar
caligrad caligrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 1,844
^^^ That's good I guess. I actually wish the city would drop the one way street nonsense and revert fig back to being a two directional ave all the way through. Lose a lane in each direction, add bike lanes and call it a day, maybe even add a median with trees (I'm still team boo with the current streetcar plan).
     
     
  #2464  
Old Posted Aug 20, 2016, 8:50 PM
ConstructDTLA's Avatar
ConstructDTLA ConstructDTLA is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: LA
Posts: 1,454
Now:

820 Olive / 825 Hill by Hunter, on Flickr

Wilshire Grand by Hunter, on Flickr
__________________
     
     
  #2465  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2016, 10:16 AM
kelbeen's Avatar
kelbeen kelbeen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Irvine, CA
Posts: 357
[8/21]





     
     
  #2466  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2016, 5:43 PM
kaneui kaneui is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 1,561
Quote:
Originally Posted by ThebiteofSuarez View Post
Each section of the spire is perforated with circular holes, and at the base of each section, on the inside, there are sets of lights that point upwards and have enough luminosity to light up the spire as seen in the pics here:

http://www.acmartin.com/story/wilshire-grand-reshaping-las-skyline
It looks like it's only the 18' stainless-steel beacon section at the top that will be perforated and lit from the inside--otherwise, I hope there will be additional lighting to accent the white portion of the spire at night.
     
     
  #2467  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2016, 8:20 PM
Mojeda101's Avatar
Mojeda101 Mojeda101 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: DTLA
Posts: 1,474
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneui View Post
It looks like it's only the 18' stainless-steel beacon section at the top that will be perforated and lit from the inside--otherwise, I hope there will be additional lighting to accent the white portion of the spire at night.




The entire thing is supposedly lighting up. We shall see what happens.
__________________
     
     
  #2468  
Old Posted Aug 21, 2016, 8:27 PM
ladowntowner ladowntowner is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2007
Location: DTLA
Posts: 441
^^^ Wow! Imagine being the one to service the lighting on that baby! Not a lot of room for a person inside once you consider the lighting fixtures, particularly since it tapers down to only 3.33' diameter at the top and does not look like the lighting will be externally accessible. I do hope I'm wrong and they maintain it properly.
__________________

Nice!!!
     
     
  #2469  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2016, 4:57 PM
Wilcal Wilcal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Location: Yucaipa--LA exurban wasteland
Posts: 711
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mojeda101 View Post




The entire thing is supposedly lighting up. We shall see what happens.
This does seem to be the final version of what the spire will be (little red beacon and all--I'm guessing that it is used to scare way the planes). Also, gone is my fantasy of a blindingly brilliant white beacon (similar to a lighthouse) which rotates and scans the sky visible for miles and miles on a clear night. Would that be necessary--no, of course not; would it be a throwback--yeah, so what?; would it it be just for vain and cosmetic reasons--you be your ass it would. If for all of those reasons, I would say-- now how fucking cool would that have been.

Last edited by Wilcal; Aug 24, 2016 at 1:43 AM.
     
     
  #2470  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2016, 5:00 PM
ChargerCarl ChargerCarl is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: Los Angeles/San Francisco
Posts: 2,407
I for one welcome our Korean overlords.
     
     
  #2471  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2016, 5:28 PM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,728


Quote:
insert90

From what I understand, having the subway to UCLA being built by 2024 isn't dependent on the Olympics. They first requested federal funds for 2024 completion way back in 2011, and have been trying since then. The Olympics are a nice incentive to speed it up, but the project has plenty of merit on its own, and is one of the more worthwhile mass transit projects in the entire country imo. If the November ballot measure gets passed, which I think has a decent shot of happening, the Purple Line's construction is going to be sped up, Olympics or not.
Quote:
hektor
Location:Leiden, The Netherlands

French daily L'Équipe says today that the general feedback they got in Rio from the IOC insiders is that it is the US's turn and as a consequence Los Angeles 2024 is the favourite.



cardcow.com

Quote:
The co-favorite
2. Paris, France

The French capital was considered a shoo-in to win the 2012 Games before London swooped in to win the vote (showing that dual European bids don’t necessarily split the vote at all). With the use of Parisian landmarks in various events, Paris will have beauty on its side, as well as the round number of “100,” as in “100 years since Paris last hosted a Summer Games,” something that will surely be played up. Of the four European cities bidding for the Games, Paris makes the most sense and it has been more close more recently, giving it the ultimate trump card. Still, I think the IOC will be looking elsewhere.

The 2024 Olympic host
1. Los Angeles, United States

By 2024, it will have been nearly 30 years since the U.S. hosted a Summer Olympics and 22 years since the Winter Olympics came stateside. Since the Atlanta Games of 1996, Europe and Asia have hosted twice (Athens and London; Beijing and Tokyo, respectively) and the Games have gone south of the equator two other times (Sydney and Rio de Janeiro). Chicago, which had a fine, if slightly mediocre, bid for the 2016 Games, was also thought to have been “robbed” of an Olympics, but really didn’t have a shot against beach volleyball at Copacabana.

Los Angeles has hosted twice before, but went unopposed in both those instances. And while the USOC’s disaster with Boston certainly didn’t help anything, that mess will be long forgotten by the time bids are made and sealed in two years. With plenty of pre-existing venues, including the likely existence of a massive, modern NFL stadium in a few years, LA seems like the sort of painless host city the IOC needs. There’s also this not-so-trivial fact: The 2024 Games are the first of three Summer Games in NBC’s massive extension as televised rights holder and you can guess that the Peacock network is expecting an American Olympics in one of those three years (2024, 2028, 2032). Why not get it out of the way early, IOC, in a city that knows its way around hosting the Summer Games?
     
     
  #2472  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2016, 5:34 PM
Just-In-Cali's Avatar
Just-In-Cali Just-In-Cali is offline
Urbanite in Suburbia
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Location: Los Angeles Metro
Posts: 563
Quote:
Originally Posted by kaneui View Post
It looks like it's only the 18' stainless-steel beacon section at the top that will be perforated and lit from the inside--otherwise, I hope there will be additional lighting to accent the white portion of the spire at night.
Another Render from DTLA Rising shows a different lighting scheme for the spire. Since only the part that has the perforations is the tip, this may be their plan for the remainder. It looks like they have some kind of flood lighting on each segment. Thoughts?

This may be outdated as well...but I guess we'll see.
__________________
Blue State Heaven
     
     
  #2473  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2016, 8:54 PM
StethJeff's Avatar
StethJeff StethJeff is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 2,066
Dude, kelbeen, incredible.
     
     
  #2474  
Old Posted Aug 22, 2016, 9:08 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
     
     
  #2475  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 6:50 AM
citywatch citywatch is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 6,728
Quote:
Originally Posted by ConstructDTLA View Post
I'm hoping we get another Citywatch post quoting Yelpers complaining about our rundown neighborhood.
Hunter, since I've noticed you through the months not hesitating to give low marks to LA, I'm not sure if you're therefore approving or disapproving of other ppl's negative comments directed at dtla, such as those 2 visitors to the Perch restaurant.

however, if you're like an anti-LA troll who shall go unnamed....& I hope you're far better than that person....the amusing thing is he....the epitome of a flame baiter....& it's fairly obvious he's the same forumer who was banned awhile back & is now using a different login name....has no problem laying it on thick as to what he perceives are the city's shortcomings. But when it comes to the weak points that the typical, average person notices, or is far more likely to see & point out, the anti LA troll becomes amusingly uninterested, unconcerned, puzzled or even resentful.

I don't think most ppl, either living in or visiting LA, care about the finer....or nitpicky.....points of urbanism the way various forumers here do. But I'm fairly certain most ppl do notice whether dtla is generally clean, presentable & attractive. Details such as bldg height, width of sidewalks, size of parking podiums, retail on the main floor, or architectural quality....within reason....come in a distant second to those same ppl when they're looking at dtla & trying to figure out whether they like it or not.



Quote:
Here’s who’s backing the fight against the Neighborhood Integrity Initiative

Many developers fear the Neighborhood Integrity Initiative, a proposed March 2017 ballot measure which calls for a two-year moratorium on substantial developments in Los Angeles that require certain zoning amendments.

Now, a coalition has formed to fight it, with a focus on how the initiative, if approved, could exacerbate L.A.’s housing shortage. It’s called the Coalition to Protect L.A. Neighborhoods & Jobs, and it is an increasingly organized and well-funded group. From January 1 to June 30, 2016, the Coalition received monetary and in-kind donations of more than $800,000.

“It’s probably the largest, broadest coalition our city has seen in response to an election initiative,” said Josh Komensky, a Coalition to Protect L.A. Neighborhoods & Jobs spokesperson. “People who do not agree on other issues are coming together to put a stop to this.”

The coalition has the support of labor groups such as Laborers Union Local 300; affordable housing advocates such as Southern California Association of Non-Profit Housing; poverty-focused non-profits such as the Downtown Women’s Center and Skid Row Housing Trust; L.A. City Council members such as Mitch O’Farrell and Gil Cedillo; and business groups such as the Los Angeles Area Chamber of Commerce — parties that don’t always play well together in the sandbox. Most of its funding, however, comes from developers.

One of the developers that the NII used as its poster child for overdevelopment — Crescent Heights, the Miami, Florida-based developer behind the 751-unit mixed-use Palladium Residences project — is the largest backer of the coalition.

According to a campaign statement filed this month with the Los Angeles County Ethics Commission, the development firm, under its LLC “CH Palladium” donated $511,000 to the Coalition from the period between April 1 and June 30. The second-biggest donation was from Westfield Development, which chipped in $100,000.

Other notable donations during that period include $25,000 from billionaire philanthropist Eli Broad, whose Eli and Edythe Broad Foundation recently founded the Broad art museum in Downtown Los Angeles. Los Angeles-based developer Lowe Enterprises donated $25,000.

The coalition argues that the density restrictions proposed by the NII will make it nearly impossible to build new and affordable housing. By severely restricting the supply of housing in Los Angeles, rents and pricing will push the working class out of the already restrictive L.A. housing market, the Coalition argues.

A report compiled by the California Legislative Analyst’s Office finds that for every 100 people who moved to the state between 2005 to 2015, an estimated 21.5 housing units were built, a disparity that already has caused rental and purchase rates to soar.

High-profile supporters of the initiative include Leonardo DiCaprio, Kirsten Dunst, Joaquin Phoenix, Chris Pine, Garrett Hedlund and Chloe Sevigny, according to release by the NII.
     
     
  #2476  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 10:09 AM
caligrad's Avatar
caligrad caligrad is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Location: Long Beach
Posts: 1,844
^^^ Perfect statement Citywatch.
     
     
  #2477  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 4:56 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
     
     
  #2478  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 5:31 PM
blackcat23's Avatar
blackcat23 blackcat23 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 2,445
     
     
  #2479  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 5:34 PM
ChelseaFC's Avatar
ChelseaFC ChelseaFC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,065





Last edited by ChelseaFC; Aug 23, 2016 at 6:29 PM.
     
     
  #2480  
Old Posted Aug 23, 2016, 7:26 PM
LosAngelesSportsFan's Avatar
LosAngelesSportsFan LosAngelesSportsFan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2004
Location: Los Angeles
Posts: 7,903
Looks and sounds great! My only gripe is the low seating capacity... It should be 30k min
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:27 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.