HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Gold House North in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Burnaby Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #101  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 1:17 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,427
So the excavation shown is just for tower 1 or both? Or will tower 2 be going where that low rise apartment building is as seen in the above pics?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #102  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 1:40 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
Both are being excavated at the same time. Thr shorter tower will be directly south from the taller one. I wish it would be the other way around, but nope.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #103  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 1:47 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
Both are being excavated at the same time. Thr shorter tower will be directly south from the taller one. I wish it would be the other way around, but nope.
That wouldn't fit with Burnaby's plan to have the tallest buildings on Beresford and then slowly stepping down to the shortest ones on Imperial.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #104  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 1:56 AM
osirisboy's Avatar
osirisboy osirisboy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,427
What's the max height that they are allowing for imperial?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #105  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 3:12 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by osirisboy View Post
What's the max height that they are allowing for imperial?
Probably 3-4 stories by the looks of it, so not much taller than what's there now. Check out the pdf version of the survey esp the images on the last couple of pages.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #106  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 4:48 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
That wouldn't fit with Burnaby's plan to have the tallest buildings on Beresford and then slowly stepping down to the shortest ones on Imperial.
I know but they could mix it up a bit. Moda isn't not in the same line either. There will be lots of condos looking right into other people's homes. Vancouver has done better mixing tower heights and placing...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #107  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 5:00 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
Probably 3-4 stories by the looks of it, so not much taller than what's there now. Check out the pdf version of the survey esp the images on the last couple of pages.
Well there is already a 26 story tower proposed by Amacon on Imperial. Seems like the city is willing to allow decent height there.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #108  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 5:13 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Well there is already a 26 story tower proposed by Amacon on Imperial. Seems like the city is willing to allow decent height there.
Don't forget the 35-40 storey tower proposal for the lot at the corner of Nelson and Imperial (and Dunblane) currently in rezoning application by Transca (??).

That would make it as tall as the Mets or the Park on Nelson avenue.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #109  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 6:21 AM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,584
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #110  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 8:06 PM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Well there is already a 26 story tower proposed by Amacon on Imperial. Seems like the city is willing to allow decent height there.
Speaking of which....



I saw this recently in print media.

There's nothing online (not even on their site that only has registration information), but seeing as they're apparently this far along in their marketing process (they've also taken over the old showroom of The Park on Imperial and seem to be preparing it for their own tower), it shouldn't be too long before this project also requires its own page.

I guess that view is Imperial Street facing.
26-30 storeys (if that's how tall it really is) isn't as tall as the other towers and proposed on that mega block, but the fact that it is shorter lends credence to the notion of short height the farther away from transit stations you head.

I'm not sure how tall the other two towers proposed for just North of it in the same block will be (Midori, and the Polygon tower), but with the 35-40 storey Mets and Park, I guess they will be just shorter than those.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #111  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 9:35 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
So according to this diagram Imperial, west of Nelson will be "ground oriented residential" and east will be "core residential" or "downtown core".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #112  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 9:37 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,480
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Speaking of which....
Nice find. It looks promising. I'm liking that dark spandrel.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #113  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 10:37 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,731
On the eastern side of the diagram, the "downtown core" should extend all the way to Imperial, wrapping around Bonsor Park. The grid streets there would make a nice downtown core for Metrotown. The other parts are rather linear, especially along Kingsway: not a good downtown concept.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #114  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 11:10 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,484
Thanks for the Imperial pic!
Copied to the Burnaby thread.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
On the eastern side of the diagram, the "downtown core" should extend all the way to Imperial, wrapping around Bonsor Park. The grid streets there would make a nice downtown core for Metrotown. The other parts are rather linear, especially along Kingsway: not a good downtown concept.
Most of those parcels have or are slated to be redeveloped with residential condos.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #115  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 11:17 PM
Sheba Sheba is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: BC
Posts: 4,584
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
On the eastern side of the diagram, the "downtown core" should extend all the way to Imperial, wrapping around Bonsor Park. The grid streets there would make a nice downtown core for Metrotown. The other parts are rather linear, especially along Kingsway: not a good downtown concept.
There's another image on the pdf survey I posted earlier that shows most of the area being towers 12+ stories tall. Everything they've done so far shows Beresford and Station Square as being a lot taller than that, and then going shorter (still 12+ stories) in most areas before dropping down to lowrises when they get to the edges (next to SFH).

Even if you only visit the area, you can still fill in the survey. I know I mentioned (among other things) punching a street through to break up some of the long blocks. Looking at google maps, I can easily see them putting one in from Cassie through to Sussex (that way it would still be a local road).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #116  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 11:52 PM
logan5's Avatar
logan5 logan5 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Location: Mt.Pleasant - The New Downtown South
Posts: 8,133
Quote:
Originally Posted by Sheba View Post
It looks as if Burnaby intends on redeveloping almost every walk-up in Metrotown.

Likely in 2 decades Metrotown will be as densely populated as DT Vancouver. If they're gonna clear all the lower income people out of there, they may as well let'r rip and double the allowable density to 10 FSR.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #117  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 12:10 AM
BobLoblawsLawBlog's Avatar
BobLoblawsLawBlog BobLoblawsLawBlog is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Posts: 449
I could really see Maywood looking like the Olympic Village neighbourhood in Vancouver. With lower 7-12 storey apartments and commercial fronted streets.

Burnaby better not screw it up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #118  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 12:16 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,394
Quote:
Originally Posted by vanman View Post
Nice find. It looks promising. I'm liking that dark spandrel.
After Aldynne totally fooling us with its rendering, I wouldn't be surprised if this is exactly the same teal spandrel as everywhere else. Their excuse to misleading would be that the rendering is is in an evening setting, hence there is less light, changing the color (or similar BS).

One thing I don't understand is how developers can be so damn idiots and blind not to se how sweet those darker spandrel colors look in their misleading renderings. Why they keep building mediocre crap when there would be absolutely no difference in cost to go even slightly more exotic with their spandrel color is beyond me.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #119  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 12:23 AM
VanK VanK is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Posts: 369
Quote:
Originally Posted by Spr0ckets View Post
Speaking of which....




I'm not sure how tall the other two towers proposed for just North of it in the same block will be (Midori, and the Polygon tower), but with the 35-40 storey Mets and Park, I guess they will be just shorter than those.
The Imperial Tower = 27-storey apartment
building with street-oriented townhouses on Marlborough Avenue and live-work townhouseunits with flats above on Imperial Street.


The Polygon Tower = 38-stories
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #120  
Old Posted Aug 9, 2016, 12:29 AM
Spr0ckets Spr0ckets is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 1,948
Quote:
Originally Posted by VanK View Post
The Imperial Tower = 27-storey apartment
building with street-oriented townhouses on Marlborough Avenue and live-work townhouseunits with flats above on Imperial Street.


The Polygon Tower = 38-stories
Thanks for that.

Do you know if the Polygon Tower has a name?

It seems like Amacon may just go with 'The Imperial' as the name of their Tower (from all the marketing material, so far. It may change, though)
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:12 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.