Quote:
Originally Posted by Caruso975
TI allowances absolutely have an impact on profitability. TI allowances for raw or new space may be as high as &60 to $80 per RSF. Somewhat less for retrofitting existing space.
Aramark most likely going to the Marketplace which will be renovated to a class B quality. Apparently no residential. No vertical mixed use.
|
I never said they didn't champ - they affect developers. The amount of TI dollars a landlord will fork over is a direct correlation to the inventory available on the market. TIs are obviously higher for raw space, that's not rocket science. That being said if you're building new construction and are delivering shell then you're going to need to pay higher amounts to steal tenants from another building so they can build the initial fit out (aka what BrandyWine did to get FMC). This may affect developers cost basis, but not private equity groups who are buying office in a low vacancy submarket. Economics 101, don't pay more than replacement cost. The fact of the matter is that spec office construction is still limited so TI dollars for 2nd generation space is still relatively close to 1 years rent (in philly that's around $30psf), give or take the quality of the tenant, SF leased, term, or a multitude of other factors.
You're betting Aramark, a 8.7 billion dollar company, will take Class B space? I'll take that bet. I think you may be a tad off. No one is developing class B - rents don't justify the high costs of construction. Look at FMC, they needed $50 psf gross just to make that investment work. PMC isn't shelling out $250m for some class B space. I also don't think Aramark will move there. It was the rumor a few months ago but to be honest I don't think PMC can deliver on time. That's just my opinion though.
Here's some details on the development.
http://articles.philly.com/2016-02-18/business/70701838_1_market-street-rents-jonathan-stavin