HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1441  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2016, 8:38 PM
lilwayne lilwayne is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Posts: 757
Quote:
Originally Posted by bomberjet View Post
^Sort of. Pretty sure they've issued bonds on the project, just like those other ones you mention. In addition to selling the condos. That's how they purchased the property and built the sales centre, prior to selling any units.
I'm pretty sure they have to demolish the st regis hotel within a certain date or forfeit the land back to centre venture plus lose their money..

so time is ticking for them..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1442  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2016, 9:44 PM
cllew cllew is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by lilwayne View Post
I'm pretty sure they have to demolish the st regis hotel within a certain date or forfeit the land back to centre venture plus lose their money..

so time is ticking for them..
Or they ask for an extension on the start date to keep the option on the St. Regis open.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1443  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2016, 9:45 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
IIRC they're not allowed to demolish St. Regis until SkyCity has started in earnest. They also have to submit a full detailed plan and obtain all permits and prove viability before they demolish. And yes, last resort, they turn it over after a certain amount of time if there's no construction... I believe it was 2 years after start of SkyCity construction, can't remember exactly though.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1444  
Old Posted Jul 22, 2016, 10:10 PM
Cyro's Avatar
Cyro Cyro is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 5,197
Discussed previously..Clarification:No connection to the SkyCity Dev. or some type of caveat that is in place with it's moving forward or not.

Quote:
The deal is subject to a development agreement with Fortress Real Developments Inc. that would include a 625-stall parking structure and commercial/retail complex. Construction has to begin by 2017 or the deal will be scrapped.

...
CentreVenture president and CEO Angela Mathieson said Fortress provided a $1 million down payment toward the purchase of the St. Regis and CentreVenture has arranged a mortgage for the company for the balance of $3 million through its urban development bank.....


http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/c...l-plans-for-parkade-and-retail-1.3090052
__________________
♥ ♥
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1445  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 5:03 PM
Jeremy6 Jeremy6 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Location: Winnipeg, MB
Posts: 64


Previously confirmed but here's the billboard showing 160+ units sold.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1446  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 5:20 PM
Biff's Avatar
Biff Biff is offline
What could go wrong?
 
Join Date: Jun 2004
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 9,842
Sad that one of the shortest buildings in downtown is the best looking building at night.
__________________
"But a city can be smothered by too much reverence for its past. The skyline must keep acquiring new peaks, because the day we consider it complete and untouchable is the day the city begins to die." - Justin Davidson - May 2010 Issue of New York
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1447  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 6:00 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
^So true. Although I really hope it inspires other building owners to do the same. It's a good marketing thing to be honest — it looks good for RBC to have their building stand out so much. I know people who know nothing about anything that we talk about on here who are like "the RBC building looks great."

The Grain Commission building is a prime candidate, the odd shape of it could lead to some awesome lighting effects. Radisson too.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1448  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 6:32 PM
BigG's Avatar
BigG BigG is offline
Ignore these four words.
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Fort Garryish
Posts: 1,110
^^If only the RBC Building were 3X taller. It would look spectacular at night.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1449  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 6:52 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
I am at the point where I would be content with SkyCity slightly reduced in height if it meant seeing construction start sooner.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1450  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 7:03 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
^ especially given that we're going to get a new tallest now either way
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1451  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 7:08 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
Exactly. A massive void in this section of downtown is going to be filled, so if it is slightly shorter, no big deal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1452  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 7:24 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,233
But it would still be cool if it was built to full height!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1453  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 7:25 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
The sooner construction starts, the sooner people move in, the sooner...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1454  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 7:32 PM
optimusREIM's Avatar
optimusREIM optimusREIM is offline
There is always a way
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 3,233
Solution: make the foundation capable of supporting the taller tower then if all of the sudden demand jumps because construction has begun then they can choose to expand the scope, a la TNS
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1455  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 8:37 PM
oftheMoon's Avatar
oftheMoon oftheMoon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: East Exchanger
Posts: 675
^^^ great ideas! Get the shovels in the ground for the newest 25 - 30 story residential tower that's already sold 160+ units and get this thing going!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1456  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 8:48 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
Solution: make the foundation capable of supporting the taller tower then if all of the sudden demand jumps because construction has begun then they can choose to expand the scope, a la TNS
Well, highly unlikely... As far as I'm aware TNS scopes were finalized before any concrete was poured...

Regardless, concrete costs in particular are so high here (I definitely suspect collusion) that significant overbuilding of foundations will not likely be encouraged by the developer. Profits are already so thin in Winnipeg.

I want to see this go ahead, but I'm ont sure I believe the 160+ number just because it's on a billboard. Nonetheless, latest reports hint at an upswing in downtown living so hopefully that helps.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1457  
Old Posted Jul 28, 2016, 9:53 PM
buzzg buzzg is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Posts: 7,834
It's been said numerous times, but I'm definitely on team "rather 2 20's than 1 40-storey" — lets worry about filling out before we fill up.

... Although that being said there's probably a high chance if that happened we may only ever get a phase 1.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1458  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2016, 4:31 PM
DowntownBooster DowntownBooster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2006
Posts: 320
Quote:
Originally Posted by optimusREIM View Post
But it would still be cool if it was built to full height!
Agree.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1459  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2016, 7:40 PM
Wolf13 Wolf13 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2016
Posts: 1,664
Quote:
Originally Posted by buzzg View Post
It's been said numerous times, but I'm definitely on team "rather 2 20's than 1 40-storey" — lets worry about filling out before we fill up.

... Although that being said there's probably a high chance if that happened we may only ever get a phase 1.
I agree... but we run a strong risk, and I may guess 2/3 chance that we'd only get that one tower then.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1460  
Old Posted Jul 29, 2016, 10:36 PM
Urban recluse Urban recluse is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 4,797
So one tower gets built there--sooner, great. They can move on to another of the many, many sites around the downtown which need developing.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Manitoba & Saskatchewan
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:29 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.