Quote:
Originally Posted by hipster duck
To get nerdy and quantify it, I would say a skyline is some combo of variety (often based on history), height, urban surroundings and natural surroundings.
On a scale of 0-10, I would say:
Variety / Height / Urban Surr / Natural Surr [TOTAL]
Toronto 6 8 6 4 [24]
Montreal 5 3 8 5 [23]
Quebec City 6 1 7 8 [22]
Vancouver 2 3 5 10 [20]
Calgary 4 7 3 4 [18]
Halifax 3 2 5 6 [16]
Winnipeg 4 3 4 3 [14]
Edmonton 3 4 3 4 [14]
Mississauga 2 6 1 1 [10]
Some comparisons:
New York 10 9 10 7 [36]
Rio de Janeiro 3 2 8 10 [23]
Hong Kong 8 10 9 9 [36]
Chicago 9 9 9 4 [31]
|
I think this is a really terrific and thought-provoking itemized ranking.
My quibbles? I'd go with 3 for Quebec City on variety, 6 for Montreal on natural surroundings, 1 for Calgary on urban surroundings, and for Chicago I'd go with 6 for urban surroundings and 1 for natural surroundings.
Toronto and Chicago equal at 6 on urban surroundings, you might furrow your brow? Well, yeah. Toronto missed out on the 19th multi-story streetwalls of the northeastern seaboard, resulting in too much row-housing too close to the city centre, but the shopfronts on its main commercial streets are a lot nicer than Chicago's, and Chicago's tenements are detached, making for a mostly bleak hodge-podge on its residential streets.