Quote:
Originally Posted by Good2go
No. I pay $109 per month for my spot. When I come to work in the morning, I need my spot to be empty. When I come back to work after lunch, I need my spot to be empty. Without the parking lot owners protecting their private property and their business, I'm SOL.
|
I agree
Good2go, you have an absolute right to safe and secure reliable parking if you are paying for the privilege. Nobody would argue against this.
I pay for parking at the hospital too. It's also safe and secure. The difference is that my parking space is behind a gate and access into the lot is only available if you have a key card. Patient's and visitors to the hospital know that my lot is a private lot and that the lot is inaccessible to the general public.
This is the issue. There can be
absolutely no ambiguity in anyone's mind whether a particular lot is a reserved private parking lot or not. To this end, the city should pass a bylaw clearly stating that private parking lots in the city maintaining reserved parking spaces for clients must be (1) fenced in, (2) gated and (3) have restricted access, like a key card.
If the city adopted a policy such as this, then residents and visitors to the downtown would automatically be able to tell where they are allowed to park and where they can not. If the situation were as crystal clear as this, then the boot Nazi's would be starved out of existence.
This ambiguity and uncertainty around parking downtown is a curse on everyone,
including downtown store and restaurant owners who lose business to other parts of the city because potential customers would rather go elsewhere rather than risk getting booted.
The answer to the dilemma is
fences, gates and card access. It's time to shit or get off the pot.......