HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    Delta Rise in the SkyscraperPage Database

• Building Data Page   • Delta Skyscraper Diagram

• Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #81  
Old Posted Jul 3, 2016, 2:42 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
Made a bried stop while driving by today. Seven or so more floors to go.

This is such a strange tower for the location and the above-ground parkade doesn't really help to create nice streetscape.





Reply With Quote
     
     
  #82  
Old Posted Jul 4, 2016, 6:56 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
It's not that out of place considering the amount of commercial in the area. No different than any other commercial node of the Lower Mainland really. Also this area is the defacto North Delta town centre, and there are the 2 other 15 storey towers next to it. I doubt this will be the last tower in the area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #83  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 9:36 AM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
It's turning out much better than anticipated. I mean I would rather this be built in place of 1300 Richards downtown. My pics taken yesterday.








Last edited by vanman; Jul 13, 2016 at 10:43 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #84  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 2:18 PM
Metro-One's Avatar
Metro-One Metro-One is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Location: Japan
Posts: 18,022
It is always odd seeing the one tall tower in a super suburban setting, but you do have to start somewhere.

I also agree, it is actually not a bad looking tower.

As always, thanks for the pics guys.
__________________
Bridging the Gap
Check out my Flickr: https://www.flickr.com/photos/30634635@N03/with/29495547810/ and Youtube channel https://www.youtube.com/channel/UCV0_0h9qKlhxXFxuAey_q6Q
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #85  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 4:51 PM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Metro-One View Post
It is always odd seeing the one tall tower in a super suburban setting, but you do have to start somewhere.

I also agree, it is actually not a bad looking tower.

As always, thanks for the pics guys.
The setting isn't really that suburban, Scott Road is the de facto Broadway of the Surrey/Delta area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #86  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 6:52 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Podium looks good, quite urban.

Also, yeah, that area is not suburban at all, other than Delta being a 'suburb' of Vancouver. There's a common misconception over what suburban is. Suburban is considered low density under 5 units per acre by most municipal plans. The form of development all around there is well over that between 10-30 units per acre, and considered urban with fairly compact lots, commercial, and plenty of multi-family.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #87  
Old Posted Jul 13, 2016, 8:19 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,768
Looks good.
Nice to see cladding on the podium and not painted concrete.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #88  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 2:25 AM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 713
Thanks for the pics, vanman! It's going to look even better when the balcony glass goes in. (I'm hoping we'll be able to say that about 1300 Richards too...)

As for the area, I think Scott Road is pretty textbook suburban in it's current form. It certainly has some density, but I think that's only one factor. More than half the street is still made up of strip malls, and the rest is suburban-style townhomes, SFHs (some), and low-rise apartment buildings which don't meet the street very well. There are some good exceptions though, and things are improving. One example is Muse, which to me should be the minimum standard from here on:


https://www.buzzbuzzhome.com/ca/muse-con..._11_13_08_53_46_musecondos_rendering.jpg

Another problem for North Delta is walkability, which is pretty poor. I don't mean to be putting the area down though. Brentwood, even with its prominence these days, is still quite suburban with only a couple existing sections of true urban form.

That being said, this site has the largest concentration of high-rises in Delta - this one being the fourth. It'll be interesting to see if any other developers try to build off the success of this project.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #89  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 5:11 AM
BodomReaper BodomReaper is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 987
Great point re: 1300 Richards. It's embarrassing for everyone involved that a tower going up in the region's most desirable location, by a 'top' developer, has if anything a worse level of design and finish than a tower in *North Delta* by a developer who only has a few crappy woodframe lowrises to their name.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #90  
Old Posted Jul 14, 2016, 5:39 AM
urbancanadian urbancanadian is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 713
Totally. It's a disgrace.

Sometimes I feel like the developers just slap on whatever materials they can find assuming that the wealthy homeowners will replace it with something much more tasteful when it comes time to replace the different parts...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #91  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2016, 2:36 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
I haven't notice before, but this tower will be very visible when driving eastbound on SFPR. It is even more prominent earlier, but I didn't get a chance to snap a photo.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #92  
Old Posted Jul 19, 2016, 3:57 AM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,493
It is very prominent looking straight down North Road towards Lougheed. Looks very tall, if distant, from there. North Road and Scott Road are almost in line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #93  
Old Posted Aug 8, 2016, 12:35 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,768
From SSC July 31st:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Quote:
Originally Posted by Yellow Fever View Post
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #94  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2016, 9:06 PM
LeftCoaster's Avatar
LeftCoaster LeftCoaster is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Toroncouver
Posts: 13,161
Grabbed a shot from the plane last week. Looks just massive from above:

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #95  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2016, 9:45 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
^Nice view!

I was down in that area last week and it really dominates looking up Scott Rd, but also fits in with how busy and urban the area is becoming. Between 72 and 82 there are some newer 4-storey apartments with ground retail built up the sidewalk along Scott Rd, and more (better) shops, restaurants and services along the stretch than Surrey City Centre.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #96  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2016, 9:46 PM
clee7903 clee7903 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 330
wow great shot from the plane! It's so noticeable now since it's the only "rise" within at least 5km radius of any other high rises.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #97  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2016, 10:40 PM
Vin Vin is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 8,738
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shift View Post
^Nice view!

I was down in that area last week and it really dominates looking up Scott Rd, but also fits in with how busy and urban the area is becoming. Between 72 and 82 there are some newer 4-storey apartments with ground retail built up the sidewalk along Scott Rd, and more (better) shops, restaurants and services along the stretch than Surrey City Centre.
It's just a myth that tall towers don't fit when they are "built anywhere". Once done, they always fit. Brentwood area was built from nothing and now the towers totally "fit in".
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #98  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2016, 11:11 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Also this tower is really just the start of the redevelopment of the corridor between 72 and Nordel Way (88). The recently adopted North Delta Area Plan has designated 3 High Density nodes along Scott Rd at 72 Ave, 80 Ave, and Nordel Way, all with towers ranging from 18-32 Storeys. This project is the tallest amongst the nodes and shown as site 'D' on the 2nd plan posted below.

There is also a long-term vision for LRT down Scott Rd.









http://www.delta.ca/your-government/delta's-projects/north-delta-area-plan-review
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #99  
Old Posted Aug 29, 2016, 11:12 PM
Marshal Marshal is offline
perhaps . . .
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 1,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Vin View Post
It's just a myth that tall towers don't fit when they are "built anywhere". Once done, they always fit. Brentwood area was built from nothing and now the towers totally "fit in".
Yes, 'fitting in' is just a fictional judgement. I just saw this tower from the same vantage point (from a plane) and it was surprisingly powerful as a singular point of contrast. You see the clusters all over the place and then there is a large flat area (western Surrey and North Delta) with this singular pinnacle in the 'middle.' It fit beautifully and even provides a point of contrast to the other high-rises of the region. It's tall enough to be a landmark all on its own.

To argue that it doesn't fit is to argue the mountains don't fit with the valley, or an alpine lake doesn't fit with the surrounding forest. It's baseless uninformed opinion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #100  
Old Posted Aug 30, 2016, 12:35 AM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
I am surprised how positive reception this project is getting from so many. I am not annoyed by it, but saying that it is start of something big and beautiful is a stretch. Even Surrey Central is still far from something that, let alone this area.

Maybe in 20 years, just maybe...
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:03 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.