Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6
8. A flapjack
UK: A flat oatmeal snack
US: A type of pancake
US, would use only when affecting US vernacular (but maybe it's changing as "fries" for "chips" used to be the same sort of thing, and other US food terms like "frosting" for "icing" and "stuffing" for "dressing" (in turkeys) have come from nowhere to supplant the Canadian terms in my own short lifetime).
|
Interesting. But isn't it "the icing on the cake," not "the frosting on the cake"? Or would Americans simply use the former as the colloquial saying, while still using the latter when making or eating a cake?
This kind of dual usage still happens. An immediate example that comes to mind is "pound the pavement" to describe working hard at finding a job. We in North America say "sidewalk" for the pedestrian passageway at the side of the street, and I'm sure most of us don't know that "pavement" is the original term for "sidewalk," but we still use this term.
Actually, we use it, but I'd bet that most North Americans wouldn't precisely understand what it means, assuming it vaguely connotes running around on the pavement aka asphalt on the streets to find a job.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Andy6
Both. I have a certificate somewhere saying I am the first one and we still use the term a lot, even if not very often to name our profession (e.g. in terms like "solicitor-client privilege"). But there used to be lots of signs saying "No Soliciting" which used to be what you'd put up to ward off door-to-door salesmen rather than door-to-door lawyers.
|
Just yesterday I saw a sign in a shop that said "no solicitation." What I'm thinking is that in Canada we understand the noun indicating the action to refer to cold calls in the field of sales, but the noun indicating the person ("solicitor") isn't generally associated with a person who does cold calls.
So, signs saying "no soliciting" and "no solicitation," but none saying "no solicitors." Though I'll be on the lookout for the latter now!