HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #3901  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 12:20 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,161
Business
Developer signs deal to build 62-acre neighborhood linking South Loop and Chinatown

Kim Janssen Contact Reporter
Chicago Tribune

Quote:
The last large undeveloped swath of green space in downtown Chicago could finally be developed into a robust neighborhood linking the South Loop and Chinatown, thanks to a deal signed this week.

Related Midwest has taken part ownership of 62 acres southwest of Clark Street and Roosevelt Road, and will be the lead developer of a multibillion-dollar joint venture that promises to reshape Chicago's skyline and fill what has been described as a "hole in the center of Chicago."

Related Midwest president Curt Bailey said his company — Related is behind the 16-skyscraper, 14-acre Hudson Yards development in Manhattan and has completed a number of high-profile Chicago buildings — is "not in the habit of making small plans" and has the chops to see the project through.

It has brought more than $2 billion in residential, mixed-use and affordable housing communities to market in Chicago. Since last year, the company has owned the site of the failed Chicago Spire skyscraper.

Bailey said Related Midwest has yet to develop a detailed plan for the site and declined to give the terms of its deal with GMH, but acknowledged it would take around 15 years to complete at a cost of billions and would include residential, retail and office space. "We envision creating a great neighborhood, a great place to live, to work, shop and dine," he said.
.
link
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3902  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 12:23 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,711
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/reale...outh-loop-site

May 12, 2016
Related Midwest reaches deal to develop huge South Loop site
By Alby Gallun

Quote:
After more than a year of negotiations, Related Midwest has reached a deal to develop a 62-acre riverside property in the South Loop, one of the biggest vacant tracts in Chicago.

Related Midwest has acquired a stake in the parcel along the east side of the Chicago River, stretching a half-mile from Roosevelt Road to Chinatown, according to a statement from Mayor Rahm Emanuel and Ald. Daniel Solis, whose 25th Ward includes the property.

The site may be best known for the last developer who tried to build there: Antoin “Tony” Rezko, the former fundraiser and adviser to now-imprisoned Gov. Rod Blagojevich. More than a decade ago, Rezko planned to build more than 4,000 homes on the property, but that plan died after the real estate market collapsed and the federal probe that brought down Blagojevich ensnared Rezko, who served a prison sentence after being convicted of fraud and money laundering.

Now, with the South Loop booming once again, Related Midwest is taking on the site in what would be its biggest project ever in Chicago, one that could cost billions of dollars and last 15 years or more.


To read full story, copy/past headline into search engine.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3903  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 1:42 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
I thought Related bought a share of that site awhile ago? I remember news about it so this is interesting, or just old news being re-iterated.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3904  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 1:51 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,570
^ They were likely still in talks/loi when that news broke......deal formally just signed apparently.....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3905  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 1:53 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by spyguy View Post
The addition looks a lot better than the previous "top hat" design - I'm guessing they replaced Coffey as architect.

Very nice....glad to hear this one is revving back up....that's a good number of hotel rooms backed into this smallish, very well-located site.....also, much agree that the addition clearly looks better here than the previous version of the project, when it was to be an Indigo........I wonder if they replaced Coffey with Goettsch (given their work on Oxford's LondonHouse, which also includes an addition).....from the looks of the rendering, my guess would be so.....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3906  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 1:55 PM
SamInTheLoop SamInTheLoop is offline
you know where I'll be
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Posts: 5,570
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanLibertine View Post
I hope the northern side of the building isn't left as a giant blank wall

My guess is this is one of those cases where by code it needs to be (I mean, they could 'dress it up' somehow aesthetically....but prob. needs to be a solid wall).....someone else with better knowledge of the case at hand may correct me, though....
__________________
It's simple, really - try not to design or build trash.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3907  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 2:00 PM
sox102 sox102 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
Very nice....glad to hear this one is revving back up....that's a good number of hotel rooms backed into this smallish, very well-located site.....also, much agree that the addition clearly looks better here than the previous version of the project, when it was to be an Indigo........I wonder if they replaced Coffey with Goettsch (given their work on Oxford's LondonHouse, which also includes an addition).....from the looks of the rendering, my guess would be so.....
Architect is Hirsch Associates, along with New World Design.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3908  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 2:06 PM
sox102 sox102 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 82
Quote:
Originally Posted by SamInTheLoop View Post
My guess is this is one of those cases where by code it needs to be (I mean, they could 'dress it up' somehow aesthetically....but prob. needs to be a solid wall).....someone else with better knowledge of the case at hand may correct me, though....
The North wall will still be a solid wall, no windows or anything. Don't ask why, I'm just going from what's on the architecturals.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3909  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 2:22 PM
Ryanrule Ryanrule is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 771
So 1001 S state has some sort of mural on the south wall of the podium.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3910  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 2:29 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,711
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanLibertine View Post
I hope the northern side of the building isn't left as a giant blank wall
It'll probably remain blank (in terms of no windows) because of the possibility of the buy;dings to the north one day being demolished and replaced with a bigger/taller structure.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3911  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 2:34 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchymunch View Post
Developer signs deal to build 62-acre neighborhood linking South Loop and Chinatown
link
Here's hoping that whatever gets proposed involves rerouting the Orange Line along the Metra ROW, unless they have a cool plan of it going subway
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3912  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 2:45 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
Here's hoping that whatever gets proposed involves rerouting the Orange Line along the Metra ROW, unless they have a cool plan of it going subway
Yeah, I was going to say that they should definitely do that. Another one around 16th and State might be good, though I guess that's not far from the Red Line. One of the issues I see is Dearborn Park. They probably won't accept a bunch of people wanting to walk through their neighborhood, so the stop would have to be close to Ping Tom Park instead of ideally in the middle around 14th st. Metra stop would be easier to pull off I bet, but also only serves some people. Though if I had a dream it would be to make a new red line stop around 14th and Wabash, then make a new subway extension to this new area that you can xfer to much like the 7 extension to Hudson Yards. I've been working at Hudson Yards since December and the 7 line extension that opened last fall is very useful.

If there's anything to this though, it's that Dearborn Park screws up some of this.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing

Last edited by marothisu; May 12, 2016 at 2:57 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3913  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 3:04 PM
Ned.B Ned.B is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 619
Quote:
Originally Posted by UrbanLibertine View Post
I hope the northern side of the building isn't left as a giant blank wall
Seeing that another hotel within a couple blocks of there made the ill-advised decision to put windows and rooms right on a lot line some time ago, thinking the next door land would never be redeveloped and then got burned for it recently, they are smart to leave that wall blank. As hemmed in as that building is, that blank wall really won't have that much impact. It's there and blank right now...just 5 floors shorter.

Agreed that the glass top is better than the slopped cap it had before. I will reserve judgement until we get a better view of what they are doing with the bottom 3 floors.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3914  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 3:11 PM
Randomguy34's Avatar
Randomguy34 Randomguy34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: Chicago & Philly
Posts: 2,696
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
If there's anything to this though, it's that Dearborn Park screws up some of this.
At the same time though, if Related comes up with an extraordinary plan (knock on wood), and Dearborn Park residents start complaining about it, I think the city is going to scuff out some of those complaints and be bullish about the proposal. The city knows this site will bring on lots of money and people, so they definitely do not want to lose that opportunity to a bunch of South Loop NIMBYs. They already had that experience with the Lucas Museum and do not want to take any chances with the same thing happening here.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3915  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 3:15 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Randomguy34 View Post
At the same time though, if Related comes up with an extraordinary plan (knock on wood), and Dearborn Park residents start complaining about it, I think the city is going to scuff out some of those complaints and be bullish about the proposal. The city knows this site will bring on lots of money and people, so the definitely do not want to lose that opportunity to a bunch of South Loop NIMBYs. They already had that experience with the Lucas Museum and do not want to take any chances with the same thing happening here.
I'm sure the Friends of the Parks will intervene at this site and say that they're taking away precious land that could be converted into Chicago's next great park.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3916  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 3:30 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,125
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
I'm sure the Friends of the Parks will intervene at this site and say that they're taking away precious land that could be converted into Chicago's next great park.
Chances are whatever proposal Related comes up with will include ample parkland. Not that it matters because this is private property. Related could pave the entire parcel to create a 62 acre parking lot if they wanted and FOTP wouldn't be able to stop them. Although given their recent battles, a 62 acre parking lot might be something they would actually advocate for.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3917  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 3:31 PM
Mr Downtown's Avatar
Mr Downtown Mr Downtown is offline
Urbane observer
 
Join Date: Nov 2006
Posts: 4,393
Related Midwest signed a letter of intent in March 2015, but only now concluded the deal with GMH.

Transit access to that area is certainly a concern, but I don't think it will prove a huge problem. The first step is to either extend the 36 Broadway bus down Wells-Wentworth, or add service to the 24 Wentworth and route it that way—or both. That immediately gives the area better service than West River North has. A new bus line via Kingsbury-Wacker-Wells-Wentworth would give all the newly developing areas pretty good service.

Over the long term (30-50 years), we should route the Larrabee-Clinton subway through there:



A station on the Rock Island is pointless unless you need to go to Tinley Park or Joliet; one on the Red Line at Clark is problematic for operational reasons (curve and slope).

The bigger transportation problem for this site will be giving it adequate east-west access. Sixteenth Fifteenth should be continuous from State and go into it, but some guy who lives in a townhouse there had the ear of Mayor Daley and demanded it be broken up with two cul-de-sacs. CDOT will make the perfect the enemy of the good when it looks at the clearance underneath the Metra tracks, where you can only get about 13 feet, and will refuse to construct a substandard underpass. This is the fight worth fighting for the future of the city. Otherwise you end up with a fourth closed-off compound in the South Loop.

Last edited by Mr Downtown; May 12, 2016 at 6:08 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3918  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 3:52 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,792
^ agreed connecting Clark and Wabash through Dearborn Park is essential. In it's current form that urban subdivision is a detriment to the south loop.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3919  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 4:24 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,451
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kngkyle View Post
Chances are whatever proposal Related comes up with will include ample parkland. Not that it matters because this is private property. Related could pave the entire parcel to create a 62 acre parking lot if they wanted and FOTP wouldn't be able to stop them. Although given their recent battles, a 62 acre parking lot might be something they would actually advocate for.
Actually most of this land was at one point navigable river and therefore protected under the public trust doctrine (if FOTP wins their suit that is). It's important not to impair the wharfage along the former riverbed.


uchicago.edu
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #3920  
Old Posted May 12, 2016, 4:44 PM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Crane just went up on the student housing/apartments on Wabash near Printers Row
__________________
For you - Bane
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:28 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.