HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #9221  
Old Posted May 4, 2016, 10:43 PM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,467
Quote:
Originally Posted by exit2lef View Post
The video is now up. This link starts at 32:00 with the Block 23 presentation:

https://youtu.be/7zKTAtTJJus?t=32m
For the lazy, here are some poor quality screenshots of the concepts from the presentation:

Fry's location, 44k SF on ground floor, 10k SF underground for prep/admin space.



This Ralph's in Sherman Oaks is how they envision the corner on Jefferson/1st looking:





Loading zones for grocery store:



Ground floor retail fronting Washington:



Residential lobby/amenities fronting 2nd St.



Residential tower would span entire 2nd St. frontage from Jefferson to Washington:



NOT renderings, just ideas of the type of design we might expect:



Grocery store parking covering entire 2nd floor above grocery store/retail/residential lobby:



Basic idea of the layout for Office/residential towers:



NOT renderings, just ideas of the type of design elements for office:



Again, nothing final, but a final bird's eye conceptual idea:



Other notes:
  • Only underground parking would be parking that is currently there off 2nd St. underneath residential. They will demo everything but the walls to modernize
  • Intent is to do it all in one phase
  • Residential would be rental
     
     
  #9222  
Old Posted May 4, 2016, 10:44 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
A friend of a friend runs a department within ASU downtown and said ASU recently pulled their commitments to downtown apartments because they are going to soon build two large student housing buildings. No further information is available to me as I heard it second hand but this does line up with some of the school's recent land acquisitions.
     
     
  #9223  
Old Posted May 4, 2016, 10:51 PM
dtnphx dtnphx is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,057
Muertecaza: Thank you so much for posting these. Really gives you an idea of the visual scope and scale of the project. Good job, sir.
     
     
  #9224  
Old Posted May 4, 2016, 10:55 PM
combusean's Avatar
combusean combusean is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 7,458
Man, that last concept massing is completely underwhelming and depressing even.

Should be twice as tall.
     
     
  #9225  
Old Posted May 4, 2016, 10:58 PM
ASU Diablo ASU Diablo is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2013
Posts: 2,507
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
Man, that last concept massing is completely underwhelming and depressing even.

Should be twice as tall.
Agreed...wished it was way taller. Perhaps flip the office/retail locations resulting in taller office tower? I thought office vacancies in downtown/midtown were trending down...
     
     
  #9226  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 12:01 AM
ASUSunDevil ASUSunDevil is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 952
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
Man, that last concept massing is completely underwhelming and depressing even.

Should be twice as tall.
I'd bet that it will look extremely similar to the Dallas RED project (minus giant Dirk):

http://bizbeatblog.dallasnews.com/2015/05/tim-thumb-grocery-store-coming-to-uptiwn.html/
     
     
  #9227  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 1:15 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
I think it'd be cool to play up the concept of the original town site. I'd call it something like PHX Town Site or Town Square. It would be a nice play off of Cityscape next door.

I also think it'd be the perfect site for a new local brewery in the retail portion and perhaps a Mexican or even better, a Sonoran/Southwest restaurant.
     
     
  #9228  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 3:16 PM
gymratmanaz gymratmanaz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,933
How tall is each tower?
     
     
  #9229  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 3:17 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by combusean View Post
Man, that last concept massing is completely underwhelming and depressing even.

Should be twice as tall.
The office seems okay, I wish the residential was taller, but for me it is all about the street design, I don't care how tall any of it is.

That office looks to be about as tall as Palmar 20ish stories?? not bad we haven't had a new office building in like 8 years.

IS there some reason e cant get anything in the 30's though??
     
     
  #9230  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 3:24 PM
PHXFlyer11 PHXFlyer11 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 1,441
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
The office seems okay, I wish the residential was taller, but for me it is all about the street design, I don't care how tall any of it is.

That office looks to be about as tall as Palmar 20ish stories?? not bad we haven't had a new office building in like 8 years.

IS there some reason e cant get anything in the 30's though??
The two footprints seem to make U-shapes around the perimeter. It would be awesome to see something 32-35 in the center of those U's.
     
     
  #9231  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 3:54 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by biggus diggus View Post
A friend of a friend runs a department within ASU downtown and said ASU recently pulled their commitments to downtown apartments because they are going to soon build two large student housing buildings. No further information is available to me as I heard it second hand but this does line up with some of the school's recent land acquisitions.
I desire to know more.
     
     
  #9232  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 4:21 PM
dtnphx dtnphx is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2009
Posts: 1,057
I would guess the office tower will be at least as tall as Cityscape's office tower which is 28 floors and about 562K SF. To make it pencil out, it has to be huge. The residential portion height is less certain as I don't think Phoenix is a 30+ floor living city yet (could be wrong).
     
     
  #9233  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 5:04 PM
LocoPhoenician LocoPhoenician is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 115
That block 23 is poorly designed it should be turned 90° to have flow between cityscape and Colliers Center. Right now it cuts each off which takes away with the new restaurants coming to Colliers which is bizarre since they are both RED properties. You would thinks they would want something cohesive.
     
     
  #9234  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 5:25 PM
Obadno Obadno is offline
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 6,902
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempeAZnative View Post
That block 23 is poorly designed it should be turned 90° to have flow between cityscape and Colliers Center. Right now it cuts each off which takes away with the new restaurants coming to Colliers which is bizarre since they are both RED properties. You would thinks they would want something cohesive.
There was an article that made mention of the different street requirements that the developer has to follow+ the underground parking supports that may limit where they can place the buildings and the loading access for the grocery store
     
     
  #9235  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 5:31 PM
biggus diggus biggus diggus is offline
 
Join Date: Mar 2015
Posts: 2,838
Quote:
Originally Posted by TempeAZnative View Post
That block 23 is poorly designed it should be turned 90° to have flow between cityscape and Colliers Center. Right now it cuts each off which takes away with the new restaurants coming to Colliers which is bizarre since they are both RED properties. You would thinks they would want something cohesive.
You're only able to work with what you're given...
     
     
  #9236  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 5:39 PM
gymratmanaz gymratmanaz is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 2,933
Is there a time frame on a start to this?
     
     
  #9237  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 6:05 PM
LocoPhoenician LocoPhoenician is offline
 
Join Date: Dec 2014
Posts: 115
Quote:
Originally Posted by Obadno View Post
There was an article that made mention of the different street requirements that the developer has to follow+ the underground parking supports that may limit where they can place the buildings and the loading access for the grocery store
Then they are basically shutting down 1st & 2nd st instead of something cohesive. This will basically kill everything they are trying to do at Colliers Center.
     
     
  #9238  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 7:12 PM
mdpx mdpx is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 182
Cityscape was built like a fortress, Colliers Center was built like a fortress. A walk through development (which may not be able to be laid out other than proposed) will do nothing to create cohesion. People walking along the perimeter of the development will give it an urban vibe rather than them being in some pseudo plaza.
     
     
  #9239  
Old Posted May 5, 2016, 10:00 PM
plinko's Avatar
plinko plinko is offline
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Posts: 7,712
Ugh, yet another block turned the wrong direction that does nothing to engage what's already there.
RED had an amazing opportunity 10(?) years ago when they got started. But in the end Phoenix gets what it has always gotten...half-assed.
I suppose at least there's a grocery store. It's way too isolated from the majority of downtown residents though. 4 blocks north? Would have made way too much sense.
     
     
  #9240  
Old Posted May 6, 2016, 2:36 AM
muertecaza muertecaza is offline
 
Join Date: Oct 2015
Posts: 2,467
AZ Central article just covering the subcommittee linked above. Not much new.

http://www.azcentral.com/story/news/loca...ore-red-cityscape-frys-phoenix/83878870/
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Southwest
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:02 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.