HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #5341  
Old Posted Apr 17, 2016, 10:16 PM
mukmuk64 mukmuk64 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2015
Posts: 132
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
Cressey has bought a site at the SE corner of Main and East 2nd Ave.:
http://www.vancouvermarket.ca/2016/04/12/cressey-acquires-main-2nd-avenue-site-in-17mm-deal/
Bye bye The Narrow. It'll be sad to see you go.

I'm shocked it's taken so long for any sort of movement on development of this site to start.

It is a bit of a weird site with the alley and tiny Lorne St there. It'll be interesting to see what is proposed here.
     
     
  #5342  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2016, 3:25 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by Genauso View Post
Boulevard Residences by Redekop at Arbutus & W37th
Demolition finished, excavation is maybe 1 story deep


Pictures by me. Thanks to buzzbuzzhome.com for placing all the weird names I'd never remember if they weren't in the photos.


^^^ Quoting part of Genauso's post from Jan. 31st, 2015. Here's how Boulevard Residences is looking today.



April 17 '16, my pic

Last edited by mcminsen; Apr 18, 2016 at 4:24 AM.
     
     
  #5343  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 4:52 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by red-paladin View Post
Crane is up for Containers phase II on Terminal Ave.

It appears to be topped out now. I got this quick shot today from the Skytrain.


April 20 '16, my pic
     
     
  #5344  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 5:27 AM
CurtisVerbatim CurtisVerbatim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 218
Why is it I never see UBC projects on SSP? there are several projects always underway there. Right now that includes a huge 18 story woodframe building.
     
     
  #5345  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 5:36 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by CurtisVerbatim View Post
Why is it I never see UBC projects on SSP? there are several projects always underway there. Right now that includes a huge 18 story woodframe building.
UBC Thread
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=129284&page=30
     
     
  #5346  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 7:26 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by CurtisVerbatim View Post
Why is it I never see UBC projects on SSP? there are several projects always underway there. Right now that includes a huge 18 story woodframe building.
It's technically a separate city i believe.
     
     
  #5347  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 8:49 AM
VancouverOfTheFuture's Avatar
VancouverOfTheFuture VancouverOfTheFuture is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Posts: 3,481
Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange View Post
It's technically a separate city i believe.
correct, owned and operated by the Province basically. the CoV has 0 control over the UEL/UBC, this includes a tiny little piece that stretches from 8th Ave to 6th Ave and west of Blanca.
     
     
  #5348  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 4:12 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
correct, owned and operated by the Province basically. the CoV has 0 control over the UEL/UBC, this includes a tiny little piece that stretches from 8th Ave to 6th Ave and west of Blanca.
From wikipedia:

Quote:
An unincorporated entity, the UEL has no mayor or municipal government. Rather, it is mostly ruled by the University of British Columbia, the Greater Vancouver Regional District (GVRD) and the Province of British Columbia, and they control three entities: the University of British Columbia, University Hill and Pacific Spirit Regional Park. It is part of Electoral Area A of the GVRD.

Residential and commercial taxes are paid directly to the provincial government.

UEL residents are eligible to vote only for school board trustees in City of Vancouver municipal elections.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/University_Endowment_Lands#Government_and_politics
     
     
  #5349  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 9:43 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,487
Reminder of what Containers Phase II will look like:

Video Link
     
     
  #5350  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2016, 1:40 AM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,487
New BC Children's Hospital:

https://www.instagram.com/thenextlift/
     
     
  #5351  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2016, 1:48 AM
CurtisVerbatim CurtisVerbatim is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Surrey BC
Posts: 218
Quote:
Originally Posted by VancouverOfTheFuture View Post
Thanks!
     
     
  #5352  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2016, 2:24 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
New BC Children's Hospital:

https://www.instagram.com/thenextlift/
Did they end up saving any of the architectural details that were to be demolished on the original streamlined modern facade? I remember they city trying to get the health authority to save at least something but they weren't at all interested in architectural preservation of the old facility. website has lots more pics.


pic from: http://www.heritagevancouver.org/topten/2009/topten2009_08.html
     
     
  #5353  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2016, 4:54 AM
WarrenC12's Avatar
WarrenC12 WarrenC12 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2007
Location: East OV!
Posts: 24,540
Quote:
Originally Posted by retro_orange View Post
Did they end up saving any of the architectural details that were to be demolished on the original streamlined modern facade? I remember they city trying to get the health authority to save at least something but they weren't at all interested in architectural preservation of the old facility. website has lots more pics.


pic from: http://www.heritagevancouver.org/topten/2009/topten2009_08.html
One wing of the old Shaughnessy hospital was demolished for this new building. If and when future phases include demolishing the rest of that building, you'd have to convince the Ministry of Health that it's worth spending more money to keep any heritage sections.

It has a few interesting entrances, but I'm not sure how those would integrate, they've already been almost blocked off by the current main hospital, built in the 80s. They wouldn't be able to be re-worked into another entrance unless they were moved.
     
     
  #5354  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2016, 5:10 AM
retro_orange retro_orange is offline
retro_orange
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: East Van
Posts: 2,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by WarrenC12 View Post
One wing of the old Shaughnessy hospital was demolished for this new building. If and when future phases include demolishing the rest of that building, you'd have to convince the Ministry of Health that it's worth spending more money to keep any heritage sections.

It has a few interesting entrances, but I'm not sure how those would integrate, they've already been almost blocked off by the current main hospital, built in the 80s. They wouldn't be able to be re-worked into another entrance unless they were moved.
Yeah thats the unfortunate side of preserving stuff from the modern era (post 1930ish). It was about form, massing and expression as opposed to traditional styles that relied on applied detail.

The ironwork and lighting can be saved but the best part was the poured concrete entrances that would be prohibitively expensive to move, even for someone who wanted to save it. If anything they should replicate one of the entrances on the new building and reuse the original iron and lighting but in a better and more prominent location. Maybe on an administration section that doesn't need as many alterations over the years.
     
     
  #5355  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2016, 3:49 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcminsen View Post
March 10 '16, my pic

The Spot on Cambie/12th Ave just south of City Hall today.


April 26 '16, my pic
     
     
  #5356  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2016, 7:36 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,487
From the Courier re: plans for Jericho Lands.

Plans sound reasonable - single family at the top, townhouses in the middle and mid-rises and towers along West 4th Ave.
That should minimize view blockage.

However, towers on West 4th may be a bit far from a future Broadway subway.

http://www.vancourier.com/news/exclusive...t-nations-jericho-lands-vision-1.2240837

Quote:
EXCLUSIVE: Leaked audio says towers part of First Nations’ Jericho Lands vision

Bob Mackin / Vancouver Courier
April 27, 2016 10:17 AM

...

[Chief Ian] Campbell explained that achieving higher density would increase the land value and make it easier to gain financing to payoff the provincial loan. He mentioned the potential to build single-detached houses on the top of the property, townhouses down the slope and midrises and highrises along West Fourth Avenue. He told attendees to expect opposition.

“If you can get a 2.0 [floor space ratio] or more, you can get a lot of highrises, but that means that the discussions with local residents, they’re going to give us feedback, they’re going to give us pushback,” he warned. “They’re going to argue that we’re blocking their views, that they have a say. The local politicians over there are already beaking-off and chirping. You’ll see in the media that [David] Eby, the NDP critic for the province is already talking, as well as Joyce Murray, the federal MP.”

Campbell said the trio has talked with Mayor Gregor Robertson and city hall bureaucrats. “They’re saying yes, there’s a relationship with the city, a city of reconciliation,” but the rezoning process could take two or three years and there are no guarantees.

Campbell said the trio had also met with the West Point Grey Residents Association, but “they seem to think they have a lot of power over there as non-native residents. We’re saying that’s fine, you benefited for 150 years at our expense, it’s now our turn to step in here.”

The highest and best use of the land is residential, but Campbell said they are willing to negotiate community amenities with Vancouver city hall to gain higher density. “A school is an encumbrance, but if you want the school it’s going to cost you a number of decimal points of [floor space ratio], which is going to increase the value,” he said. “We can build the school and lease it back to them.”

Campbell said the provincial government wanted to be a partner, but “we said no way, once the transaction’s done you’re outta here, you no longer have a say, you no longer have any value other than the purchase price.”

There is no development partner yet, but Campbell revealed that David Negrin, president of Aquilini Construction and Development, was an advisor. Aquilini partnered with the same bands in 2014 to buy the Liquor Distribution Branch warehouse in East Vancouver.

The meeting’s question period was, at times, raucous. One woman said “we own this land, we didn’t sign this away, this is unceded land” and described the Musqueam as “squatters” on Squamish land.

Campbell said the Squamish, Musqueam and Tsleil-Waututh, part of the Four Host First Nations for the 2010 Winter Olympics, agreed in 2014 to collaborate, instead of compete, to jointly own land that is subject to overlapping claims. ...

...
http://www.vancourier.com/news/exclusive...t-nations-jericho-lands-vision-1.2240837
     
     
  #5357  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2016, 9:10 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by officedweller View Post
From the Courier re: plans for Jericho Lands.

Plans sound reasonable - single family at the top, townhouses in the middle and mid-rises and towers along West 4th Ave.
That should minimize view blockage.
I don't want to see any detached SFH. Townhouses/rowhouses would be a good compromise, though.
     
     
  #5358  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2016, 9:11 PM
a very long weekend's Avatar
a very long weekend a very long weekend is offline
dazzle me
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: 94109
Posts: 824
wait, so this must still go through regular city approvals? in an ideal world, it'd be building to house 15,000+ residents, kicking over the fees to help extend the train line. go bananas for this rare opportunity.
     
     
  #5359  
Old Posted Apr 27, 2016, 9:19 PM
officedweller officedweller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 41,487
Yeah, probably because it's private lands, not reserve lands (like Tsawwassen lands or Burrard Bridge area)
     
     
  #5360  
Old Posted Apr 30, 2016, 9:45 AM
mcminsen's Avatar
mcminsen mcminsen is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: Downtown Vancouver
Posts: 9,966
Quote:
Originally Posted by mcminsen View Post
Both Duke and Vya (on Kingsway just south of Kingsgate Mall) are approaching grade.


April 2 '16, my pics


Duke and Vya are above grade now.


April 29 '16, my pics






     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Downtown & City of Vancouver
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 9:27 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.