Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrequent Poster
I applaud the suburban town centre's for having the courage to build what vancouver won't (and hopefully this pressures vancouver in some way to loosen up a bit) but strictly speaking from an idea logical standpoint, I would like the tallest and most prominent buildings to be located downtown. In 5 or ten years it's not unthinkable that a tourist driving on highway 1 might not be able to tell where downtown vancouver is. Is it metrotown? Brentwood? Lougheed?Or that tabletop cluster in the distance?
Personally I don't like that scenario.
|
In the case of Surrey though it is downtown. Remember the regional growth strategy has selected Surrey Central as "Downtown" Fraser Valley and has in essence cut the region into two. Downtown Vancouver is still the metro downtown as in Metro Vancouver, but the intention is for "Downtown Surrey" to serve as the focal point for the majority of jobs and residences from Surrey out through the Fraser Valley.
So I think it is rightly the place to build this type of stuff. Brentwood and Lougheed are the regional anomalies with respect to height and largely it is being done just because they can.
That said, I have doubts anyone would mistake any other town center in the region for Downtown Vancouver. Downtown Vancouver has what now 800 high rises or something stupid like that? Let me put it this way, there are more high rises in Downtown Vancouver than all the regional town centers added together.