HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley


    3 Civic Plaza in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Surrey Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #881  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2016, 1:19 AM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrequent Poster View Post
I applaud the suburban town centre's for having the courage to build what vancouver won't (and hopefully this pressures vancouver in some way to loosen up a bit) but strictly speaking from an idea logical standpoint, I would like the tallest and most prominent buildings to be located downtown. In 5 or ten years it's not unthinkable that a tourist driving on highway 1 might not be able to tell where downtown vancouver is. Is it metrotown? Brentwood? Lougheed?Or that tabletop cluster in the distance?

Personally I don't like that scenario.
It's the natural evolution of a city. Vancouver is (hopefully) evolving to the point that it won't have just one natural centre. Mega cities like Tokyo, NY or London operate with a series of hubs, each with their own unique style and focus. London is divided into a series of boroughs and then further still into smaller districts and each with its own high street, and while the West End is the historic centre of the city, the city no longer really has a centre at all. LA is another city where a centre is impossible to define. So in that sense, booming town centres (downtowns for all practical purposes) such as Metrotown, Richmond and Surrey Central will all likely over-shadow downtown Vancouver but also enrich Greater Vancouver of the future.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #882  
Old Posted Apr 16, 2016, 4:27 AM
clee7903 clee7903 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrequent Poster View Post
I applaud the suburban town centre's for having the courage to build what vancouver won't (and hopefully this pressures vancouver in some way to loosen up a bit) but strictly speaking from an idea logical standpoint, I would like the tallest and most prominent buildings to be located downtown. In 5 or ten years it's not unthinkable that a tourist driving on highway 1 might not be able to tell where downtown vancouver is. Is it metrotown? Brentwood? Lougheed?Or that tabletop cluster in the distance?

Personally I don't like that scenario.
It's also not just what's the tallest but other factors that comes into play. Height is just one aspect. Although Surrey central, Metrotown, Brentwood, Coquitam centre and a few more have had a list of recent "boom" in density, they are mostly residential and if we examine them more closely, they are still quite sparse when compared to downtown Vancouver where limited land space have created very dense, tightly packed buildings if not always the tallest. (I mean block after block of buildings) It will be decades, if ever, the other satellite city cores I mentioned above will eclipse downtown Vancouver. Plus downtown Vancouver's building are mostly commercials, offices, high end shops - financial hub. Even our "second" most dense area in all of GVRD, Metrotown are all overwhelmingly residential and not as dense when compared to downtown Vancouver. I agree with Blease's view that our different city centres complements each other and enriches the whole region. It's also a sign that our city (the whole region) is slowly becoming a metropolis in its own right.

Last edited by clee7903; Apr 16, 2016 at 4:49 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #883  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2016, 8:15 PM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Glass is going in on the west facing condo side today. Looks a bit darker and better than the hotel side so far.



Reply With Quote
     
     
  #884  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 12:59 AM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Some more from today:







Reply With Quote
     
     
  #885  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 1:11 AM
artmarkii artmarkii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Link to the construction webcam.

http://www.3civicplaza.ca/webcam
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #886  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 3:04 AM
clee7903 clee7903 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 330
live camera feed! Cool...it looks like it's setup inside the Central tower building possibly the sales office itself? Also it looks like it needs to be zoomed out soon to see the building go higher up.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #887  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 9:41 PM
GMasterAres GMasterAres is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2007
Location: Hamburg
Posts: 3,122
Quote:
Originally Posted by Infrequent Poster View Post
I applaud the suburban town centre's for having the courage to build what vancouver won't (and hopefully this pressures vancouver in some way to loosen up a bit) but strictly speaking from an idea logical standpoint, I would like the tallest and most prominent buildings to be located downtown. In 5 or ten years it's not unthinkable that a tourist driving on highway 1 might not be able to tell where downtown vancouver is. Is it metrotown? Brentwood? Lougheed?Or that tabletop cluster in the distance?

Personally I don't like that scenario.
In the case of Surrey though it is downtown. Remember the regional growth strategy has selected Surrey Central as "Downtown" Fraser Valley and has in essence cut the region into two. Downtown Vancouver is still the metro downtown as in Metro Vancouver, but the intention is for "Downtown Surrey" to serve as the focal point for the majority of jobs and residences from Surrey out through the Fraser Valley.

So I think it is rightly the place to build this type of stuff. Brentwood and Lougheed are the regional anomalies with respect to height and largely it is being done just because they can.

That said, I have doubts anyone would mistake any other town center in the region for Downtown Vancouver. Downtown Vancouver has what now 800 high rises or something stupid like that? Let me put it this way, there are more high rises in Downtown Vancouver than all the regional town centers added together.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #888  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 11:14 PM
artmarkii artmarkii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Though on a side note Surrey's skyline is quickly becoming more and more impressive.


Took this with my phone today zoomed in all the way so the quality isn't the best.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #889  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 11:46 PM
trofirhen trofirhen is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 9,047
Quote:
Originally Posted by artmarkii View Post
Though on a side note Surrey's skyline is quickly becoming more and more impressive.


Took this with my phone today zoomed in all the way so the quality isn't the best.
Holy Smokes!! For a split second I thought it was Metrotown. Surrey really is developing a skyline.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #890  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 12:34 AM
clee7903 clee7903 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 330
same here...for a sec there i thought it was Metrotown...!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #891  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 12:47 AM
scryer scryer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,964
It looks really good! I want more towers though .
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #892  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 5:14 AM
Shift Shift is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2014
Location: Surrey
Posts: 1,944
Looks like the view from Ikea in Coquitlam. This view will fill in quite a bit over the next 10 years as the number of towers is likely to double. There are also good views developing as you approach the city centre from Newton on KGB around 80th. Also starting to see the skyline from the East-West connector in Richmond.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #893  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 5:46 AM
artmarkii artmarkii is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Posts: 40
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shift View Post
Looks like the view from Ikea in Coquitlam. This view will fill in quite a bit over the next 10 years as the number of towers is likely to double. There are also good views developing as you approach the city centre from Newton on KGB around 80th. Also starting to see the skyline from the East-West connector in Richmond.
I took the photo while I was on the Skytrain on The Millennium Line. Also when driving down 104 AVE the towers look surprisingly taller than they actually are, especially University District.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #894  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 6:05 AM
GlassCity's Avatar
GlassCity GlassCity is offline
Rational urbanist
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Location: Metro Vancouver
Posts: 5,270
Quote:
Originally Posted by Shift View Post
Looks like the view from Ikea in Coquitlam. This view will fill in quite a bit over the next 10 years as the number of towers is likely to double. There are also good views developing as you approach the city centre from Newton on KGB around 80th. Also starting to see the skyline from the East-West connector in Richmond.
The only place I can see the Surrey skyline from regularly is the Oak Street Bridge, where it looks very sparse, so that picture was a huge surprise. Looking great.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #895  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 7:02 AM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Surrey Centre towers also look quite nice from the Sapperton sky train station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #896  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 7:58 AM
clee7903 clee7903 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Surrey
Posts: 330
Quote:
Originally Posted by artmarkii View Post
I took the photo while I was on the Skytrain on The Millennium Line. Also when driving down 104 AVE the towers look surprisingly taller than they actually are, especially University District.
I've noticed that too...I think it's some sort of perspective illusion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #897  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 8:40 AM
Blease Blease is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 550
Quote:
Originally Posted by artmarkii View Post
I took the photo while I was on the Skytrain on The Millennium Line. Also when driving down 104 AVE the towers look surprisingly taller than they actually are, especially University District.
Driving westward on 104th and approaching KGB, Surrey suddenly takes on an urbane and energetic vibe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #898  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 1:43 PM
w34lth w34lth is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2015
Posts: 162
I agree with you both.

I like the glass they are putting in the residential side.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #899  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 6:23 PM
vanman's Avatar
vanman vanman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: Vancouver BC
Posts: 6,487
Quote:
Originally Posted by Blease View Post
Driving westward on 104th and approaching KGB, Surrey suddenly takes on an urbane and energetic vibe.
Definitely. The plaza area looks fantastic, especially at night. They've done a great job so far.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #900  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 8:35 PM
Jebby's Avatar
Jebby Jebby is offline
........
 
Join Date: Dec 2010
Location: Mexico City
Posts: 3,330
Quote:
Originally Posted by w34lth View Post
I like the glass they are putting in the residential side.
It does seem a lot better than the hotel portion's glass.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Vancouver > Metro Vancouver & the Fraser Valley
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 4:28 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.