HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Culture, Dining, Sports & Recreation


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #141  
Old Posted Sep 10, 2014, 5:37 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,200
Calypso water park pleads not guilty to 20 safety violations
Lawyers for water park offer to agree to several admissions if some witnesses don't testify

CBC News Posted: Sep 10, 2014 7:13 AM ET Last Updated: Sep 10, 2014 12:25 PM ET


Calypso water park has pleaded not guilty to 20 charges related to alleged safety violations at the park in 2011 and 2012, an Ottawa court heard Wednesday.

Fourteen of the charges relate to three separate incidents in 2011 involving the Steamer water slide and Calypso's alleged failure to report and respond to the incidents.

Three charges relate to an incident involving a serious injury on the ride Pirate's Aquaplay on June 27, 2012.

And the final three charges relate to an incident in which a man fractured his skull on the Orange Bobsleigh ride on June 19, 2012.

The trial of the Limoges, Ont., water park operator began Wednesday with Calypso's lawyers arguing there was no need to hear from eight of the 12 witnesses in the trial who are expected to recount the events on the day of the Orange Bobsleigh crash.

The lawyers for the company said they would agree to several admissions if the witnesses were excused, arguing their testimony would "shed more heat than light" and force witnesses to recount and relive what happened.

But Crown lawyers argued it was essential to hear testimony surrounding the "horrific and terrible results" alleged to have happened.

Witnesses are expected to testify that attendants at the top and bottom of the ride were inattentive and failed to respond after the crash, while others will testify they were thrown a considerable distance onto concrete and injured, Crown lawyers said.
Water park also facing lawsuits

The TSSA had already ordered two Calypso rides closed after some riders suffered serious injuries. Calypso made changes to the rides and reopened them.

Calypso has complained that the charges are an "abuse of power" by the TSSA and owner Guy Drouin has previously said any safety problems at the park have already been fixed.

The water park is also facing millions of dollars in lawsuits brought by individuals who say they suffered broken bones and other injuries on these rides.

Those allegations have not been proven in court.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa...ions-1.2761600
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #142  
Old Posted Apr 14, 2015, 12:13 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is offline
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,200
Calypso Water Park found guilty of six safety violations

Andrew Seymour, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: April 13, 2015, Last Updated: April 13, 2015 4:47 PM EDT


One water slide at Calypso Theme Water Park posed a danger to its riders, and another was supervised by attendants “flagrantly lacking” in knowledge of how to properly run it, an Ottawa justice of the peace ruled Monday.

Justice of the Peace Julie Lauzon found the Limoges-area water park guilty of six of 11 charges it faced under Ontario’s Technical Standards and Safety Act.

The guilty verdicts included convictions for operating the Bobsleigh slide in an unsafe manner and failing to ensure staff were properly trained on June 19, 2012. Calypso was also guilty of failing to report incidents or shut down the Steamer slide after a series of tube flips in the summer of 2011 that left several riders injured.

The park originally faced 20 charges, but a prosecutor withdrew nine charges during the trial. The park was found not guilty of another five.

In a statement Monday, Calypso said it was “disappointed” with Lauzon’s ruling. Calypso said safety is a top priority at the water park.

The verdict followed a lengthy trial during which several riders testified about crashes on the park’s slides that left them injured.

They included a collision on the Bobsleigh that Lauzon said was “absolutely preventable” had the slide’s operators been properly trained. Lauzon said employees prematurely sent a tube down the slide, causing a collision with a second tube that resulted in rider Marek Strelec’s being thrown from the slide onto the concrete below and knocked unconscious.

Lauzon also found the park failed to shut down the Steamer slide or report a serious accident on July 28, 2011, that broke one of rider Sophie St. Jacques’s vertebra in two places and put her in a halo vest for four months. St. Jacques was injured after her tube flipped as it exited the Steamer’s round, toilet-like bowl. Another rider testified to having suffered a broken collarbone in a similar flip about a month later.

It was part of what Lauzon noted was a trend of incidents on the Steamer, which she found posed an “immediate hazard” to its riders. In a one-month period in 2011, Lauzon said, there was 10 Steamer injuries, seven of which were flips and two that resulted in spinal injuries. However, the Technical Standards Safety Authority wasn’t notified about the incidents until September.

The TSSA shut down the ride, but by then the water park had already closed for the season.

Calypso was acquitted of three charges related to a lack of supervision on a children’s water playground known as the Pirate’s Aquaplay. Lauzon found there were too many ambiguities and discrepancies in the supervision requirements, making it too difficult for either the court or Calypso to ascertain how many attendants were necessary.

Calypso was also found not guilty of failing to properly configure the end run out of the Bobsleigh ride after two riders were thrown from their rafts after hitting the end of the slide. Lauzon found there was a question of whether the configuration was to blame since no cause for the crash was ever determined.

Calypso’s lawyer Lawrence Greenspon said outside of court that the public has nothing to fear riding the park’s slides. The park has made significant changes since the summer of 2012, he said, including “dramatically improved” training and the use of a light and sensor dispatch system on the Bobsleigh slide.

The water park has long ago addressed a structural problem with the Steamer, he said, and has also revamped protocols for reporting incidents on their slides.

“What I would say to the general public is come to Calypso. It is a safe and fun adventure experience,” said Greenspon.

A sentencing hearing has been set for June 12, a little more than a week after the park is set to open for the 2015 season.

[email protected]
Twitter.com/andrew_seymour

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-...ety-violations
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #143  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2016, 6:05 PM
canabiz canabiz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 829
Jan Harder tweeted earlier today she was at ProSlide with Scott Moffatt for 2016 update on Alottawata. Wondering what's up?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #144  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2016, 8:01 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by canabiz View Post
Jan Harder tweeted earlier today she was at ProSlide with Scott Moffatt for 2016 update on Alottawata. Wondering what's up?
Proslide is ottawa technology so I fully support them but generally speaking, I would prefer to see collaboration with the existing waterpark instead of 2 waterparks. (actually 3 if you include Cascades)

It would be a shame if they "watered" down the market. (I'll give myself a groan for that one)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #145  
Old Posted Apr 18, 2016, 8:37 PM
TheGoods TheGoods is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally Posted by daud View Post
Proslide is ottawa technology so I fully support them but generally speaking, I would prefer to see collaboration with the existing waterpark instead of 2 waterparks. (actually 3 if you include Cascades)

It would be a shame if they "watered" down the market. (I'll give myself a groan for that one)
Mont Cascades already use Proslide and are owned by them, see article.
http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa...tain-1.2937221

I can't wait for Mont Cascades to start their expansion.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #146  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 12:15 AM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by daud View Post
Proslide is ottawa technology so I fully support them but generally speaking, I would prefer to see collaboration with the existing waterpark instead of 2 waterparks. (actually 3 if you include Cascades)

It would be a shame if they "watered" down the market. (I'll give myself a groan for that one)
Seems completely nuts that Prolside would be building a second waterpark (third in the region). They are better off investing everything in making Cascade even more competitive with Tremblant, Calypso and Saint-Sauveur.

There's something about the Ottawa area hell bent on duplicating attractions instead of coming up with something new. Instead of a third water park or a second casino (or somehow end of with two proposals for an indoor parachuting experience; we could end of with two of five in North America) why not build an amusement park?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #147  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 12:22 AM
BlueJay's Avatar
BlueJay BlueJay is offline
Bulid Up, Not Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 381
This update once released, will be a win win for the Ottawa-Gatineau region. A few years back when Mr. Hunter delayed the development on his Alottawata project, everyone was skeptical. But he is a smart business man who has one thing that sets him above the rest, and that is called Patience!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #148  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 3:01 AM
zzptichka zzptichka is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2015
Location: Outaouias
Posts: 2,296
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Seems completely nuts that Prolside would be building a second waterpark (third in the region). They are better off investing everything in making Cascade even more competitive with Tremblant, Calypso and Saint-Sauveur.

There's something about the Ottawa area hell bent on duplicating attractions instead of coming up with something new. Instead of a third water park or a second casino (or somehow end of with two proposals for an indoor parachuting experience; we could end of with two of five in North America) why not build an amusement park?
Why invent stuff if you can build something that's known to be working?
There is clearly unmet demand for waterparks in Ottawa. Living in West end, I find Cascades boring for 1 hour drive, and lines in Calypso are just ridiculous. I've been there once on a weekday and I can't even imagine what it's like on a weekend. I would definitely visit this new waterpark with kids a few times a year.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #149  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 3:06 AM
canabiz canabiz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 829
I definitely think the city can support another water park here.

This will bring in folks from the Valley/Kanata and the 416 corridor, going so far as Kingston if you will. The Calypso will always be popular for folks in the east end, Gatineau and even Montreal.

Will be interesting to see what Jan Harder has to share, she is usually on top of this kind of stuff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #150  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 9:39 AM
eltodesukane eltodesukane is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2011
Posts: 1,131
z

Last edited by eltodesukane; Jan 14, 2017 at 7:01 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #151  
Old Posted Apr 19, 2016, 8:24 PM
TheGoods TheGoods is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 309
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post
Why invent stuff if you can build something that's known to be working?
There is clearly unmet demand for waterparks in Ottawa. Living in West end, I find Cascades boring for 1 hour drive, and lines in Calypso are just ridiculous. I've been there once on a weekday and I can't even imagine what it's like on a weekend. I would definitely visit this new waterpark with kids a few times a year.
Calypso is busy but I’m guessing they need to be busy for them to recoup their investment in a business that is only open for 3 months of the year, from early June to early September.

For Mont Cascades, they are leveraging some of their existing infrastructure and staff. My opinion only, the best approach to invest in Mont Cascades and keep people in the region, I agree with J.OT13 comments.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #152  
Old Posted Apr 20, 2016, 12:59 AM
lrt's friend lrt's friend is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Posts: 12,600
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Seems completely nuts that Prolside would be building a second waterpark (third in the region). They are better off investing everything in making Cascade even more competitive with Tremblant, Calypso and Saint-Sauveur.

There's something about the Ottawa area hell bent on duplicating attractions instead of coming up with something new. Instead of a third water park or a second casino (or somehow end of with two proposals for an indoor parachuting experience; we could end of with two of five in North America) why not build an amusement park?
At Rideau-Carleton. Make it a year long entertainment hub. It already has the Capital Fair (formerly Gloucester Fair) and would be a great venue for music festivals. Why not bring in a high class roller coaster that could operate all summer. Make it Ottawa's Wonderland.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #153  
Old Posted Apr 21, 2016, 3:40 PM
canabiz canabiz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 829
Jan Harder's latest e-newsletter indicates Proslide will start developing Alottawata in 2018. They will also introduce new technology at this park!

GREAT news for Barrhaven and surrounding area residents! Maybe the City can extend LRT to this neck o' the woods and/or build a 416 exit at Barnsdale? I can dream, can't I?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #154  
Old Posted Apr 23, 2016, 8:37 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by lrt's friend View Post
At Rideau-Carleton. Make it a year long entertainment hub. It already has the Capital Fair (formerly Gloucester Fair) and would be a great venue for music festivals. Why not bring in a high class roller coaster that could operate all summer. Make it Ottawa's Wonderland.
Now that's a good idea. Build an amusement park, hotel and maybe of few of Devecore's ideas for LeBreton around the Rideau Carleton. It's central within the metro area and it's not going to shut down the city (downtown) when everything closes at 5pm-7pm.

Last edited by J.OT13; Apr 23, 2016 at 8:56 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #155  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2016, 7:00 PM
Mr.Flintstone Mr.Flintstone is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2014
Posts: 76
Just so I understand, the guy that owns Mont cascade and pro slides is going to open another water park in Ottawa, that competes with with one of his businesses. Also said business is getting renovations as well. Am I missing something here this doesn't sound like the best business plan?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #156  
Old Posted Apr 24, 2016, 11:47 PM
BlueJay's Avatar
BlueJay BlueJay is offline
Bulid Up, Not Out
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 381
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Flintstone View Post
Just so I understand, the guy that owns Mont cascade and pro slides is going to open another water park in Ottawa, that competes with with one of his businesses. Also said business is getting renovations as well. Am I missing something here this doesn't sound like the best business plan?
In Business, it doesn't get much better than this when you have the option to market against yourself, when your really not marketing against yourself.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #157  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2016, 1:01 PM
canabiz canabiz is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2008
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 829
Quote:
Originally Posted by Mr.Flintstone View Post
Just so I understand, the guy that owns Mont cascade and pro slides is going to open another water park in Ottawa, that competes with with one of his businesses. Also said business is getting renovations as well. Am I missing something here this doesn't sound like the best business plan?
I can only speak for my immediate family (and my extended family and friends/acquaintances, to a certain degree), but we would be more inclined to visit the water parks, and to visit them more often, if we did not have to drive 1hr+ each way (from our place to both Mont Cascades and Calypso).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #158  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2016, 3:39 PM
J.OT13's Avatar
J.OT13 J.OT13 is online now
Moderator
 
Join Date: Mar 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 27,633
Quote:
Originally Posted by canabiz View Post
I can only speak for my immediate family (and my extended family and friends/acquaintances, to a certain degree), but we would be more inclined to visit the water parks, and to visit them more often, if we did not have to drive 1hr+ each way (from our place to both Mont Cascades and Calypso).
Are you likelier to drive 2 to 5 hours to visit an amusement park?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #159  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2016, 4:03 PM
daud's Avatar
daud daud is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 762
Quote:
Originally Posted by BlueJay View Post
In Business, it doesn't get much better than this when you have the option to market against yourself, when your really not marketing against yourself.
This scenario really doesn't apply if you are adding substantially to your fixed costs to access the same market segment and pool. There are times when you can create 2 different brands for essentially the same product or service, but this is an advantage only when you are achieving significant cost savings sharing a single set of costs. I don't see how a second waterpark owned by Proslide will achieve those savings. Each location has its own high set of fixed costs-infrastructure, land etc..

It makes little business sense from my point of view to have 2 waterparks owned by one company in the same market. The only reason to do so might be a temporary measure to force out the competition or if they plan to close Mont Cascades and eventually run with a single site. The waterpark market is constrained enough by the short season, operating 3 parks in a market-I can't see the profitability in that over the long term. So, for one company to open 2 locations-there has to be other objectives than profit in the near term.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #160  
Old Posted Apr 25, 2016, 4:13 PM
hwy418 hwy418 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Posts: 402
Quote:
Originally Posted by J.OT13 View Post
Are you likelier to drive 2 to 5 hours to visit an amusement park?
Having an amusement park with a smallish water park inside makes the most sense I think. I would love to have something like that in Ottawa.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Culture, Dining, Sports & Recreation
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:28 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.