HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2061  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 6:09 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmTrekker View Post
The sooner the better. I should offer my services free to the PCL. I have a under utilized sledge hammer I could bring along.

But first we would need a couple A&W teen burgers and rings for energy. They flatten the place
     
     
  #2062  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 2:38 PM
rapid_business's Avatar
rapid_business rapid_business is offline
Urban Advocate
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,889
Quote:
Originally Posted by s4.audios View Post
I would also love to see a second mini downtown with some highrises. My opinion of most ideal place to make such an investment would be Millwoods. With LRT already about to break ground there, Millwoods mall site would be the perfect place for a multiple tower redevelopment.
Maybe from a timing perspective, but it has to make sense from a desirability perspective. TOD's are precarious outside of Toronto and Vancouver. Downtown St. ALbert has that draw already and the timing makes sense. Millwoods is a different story. It might have a leg up on the Fort Road redevelopment clusterf@ck of an idea, but that is about it. Maybe a couple more seniors towers. A purpose built rental mid-rise. But that is about it that I would see for some time there. I could be wrong.
__________________
Cities are the most extraordinary human creation. They are this phenomenon which has unbelievable capacity to solve problems, to innovate, to invent, to create prosperity, to make change and continually reform. - Ken Greenburg
     
     
  #2063  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 4:01 PM
s4.audios's Avatar
s4.audios s4.audios is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,320
^TOD and that beautiful large park Millwoods has should add to the desirability. I agree it may not seem as desirable at the moment, I feel the area has gotten somewhat stale and aging. It is wishful thinking but my opinion is a massive redevelopment would do wonders to revitalize the area.
     
     
  #2064  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 5:30 PM
s4.audios's Avatar
s4.audios s4.audios is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 1,320
I've noticed Fox2 ground floor now has glass.
     
     
  #2065  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 5:39 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125




Statscan
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2066  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 6:05 PM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Glass on fox 2. Awesome. What floor will it be at in July.... I say 20-25.

Edmonton kicking 🞵🞵🞵 and taking names. Pretty impressive.
     
     
  #2067  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 9:51 PM
Kevin_foster's Avatar
Kevin_foster Kevin_foster is offline
Kevin Folds Five
 
Join Date: Jan 2005
Location: Edmonton, Canada
Posts: 6,072
^ that, or are we the tail end of the dead dog?... Butif an economic recovery comes sooner than later, we may not see a slowdown. Who knows
__________________
I used to be indecisive, but now I'm not sure...
     
     
  #2068  
Old Posted Apr 8, 2016, 10:03 PM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Kevin_foster View Post
^ that, or are we the tail end of the dead dog?... Butif an economic recovery comes sooner than later, we may not see a slowdown. Who knows
Other considerations at play from the financial bean counters:

http://www.cbc.ca/beta/news/business/fossil-fuel-investment-capital-stranded-1.3524952
     
     
  #2069  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 1:18 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,895
     
     
  #2070  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 1:22 AM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,895
And from the "Missed Boat" files:

Quote:
Kingsway's change of heart could mark major shift for transit in Edmonton

Kingsway Mall has rewritten its master plan to embrace LRT and could soon add high-density residential space, offices or more retail if Edmonton picks that transit line for new investment, the mall’s general manager says.

And it could mark a major shift in Edmonton’s treatment of transit. Susan Denney said the mall wouldn’t shunt transit riders to the far corner of the parking lot.

“Ideally, if we were to do something, we want to make it as convenient and accessible to the customer as possible,” she said. “Public transit in Edmonton as a whole has changed and grown and gained more traction. All of that has got us looking at this a little differently.”

Most transit stations in Edmonton are standalone. They’re set at the far end of mall parking lots, disconnected from retail or residential spaces. At Southgate Mall, where a combined LRT/bus station sits just metres from the mall’s west entrance, passengers have to go down a set of stairs and outdoors before they can shop.

When the Metro LRT line was being designed in the mid 2000s, Kingsway officials weren’t interested in having the line cross their property. Now they’ve told city administration they are interested. City staff included a proposal for a $88-million elevated track and new Kingsway station in a report for councillors Thursday about ways to ease traffic congestion.

The mall will do a market assessment to decide the right mix of new retail, office space and high-density residential, Denney said: “It’s a very exciting concept.”

More:
http://edmontonjournal.com/news/local-ne...mark-major-shift-for-transit-in-edmonton
     
     
  #2071  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 2:08 AM
Albicaulis's Avatar
Albicaulis Albicaulis is offline
I smash you
 
Join Date: Jan 2011
Location: Edmonton, Alberta
Posts: 261
^
I especially enjoyed the casual mention of the $88 million elevated track to deal with the cluster-**** of the existing NAIT line.

Honestly though, I'm impressed that someone spun a positive story out of this.
     
     
  #2072  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 7:10 AM
240glt's Avatar
240glt 240glt is offline
HVAC guru
 
Join Date: Sep 2006
Location: YEG -> -> -> Nelson BC
Posts: 11,297
nevermind. Can't fix stupid

Last edited by 240glt; Apr 9, 2016 at 7:26 AM.
     
     
  #2073  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 5:37 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
And from the "Missed Boat" files:
Who owns Kingsway? Ivanhoe maybe? If so, they should have known better right from the start.
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
  #2074  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 5:58 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is offline
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,125
Thanks Kingsway for the hindsight.
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers

Last edited by Coldrsx; Apr 9, 2016 at 6:09 PM.
     
     
  #2075  
Old Posted Apr 9, 2016, 6:07 PM
Hallsy's Toupee's Avatar
Hallsy's Toupee Hallsy's Toupee is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 6,895
Quote:
Originally Posted by s211 View Post
Who owns Kingsway? Ivanhoe maybe? If so, they should have known better right from the start.
Oxford. The same company that has mismanaged City Centre mall.
     
     
  #2076  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 2:20 AM
EdmTrekker EdmTrekker is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 5,247
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
Oxford. The same company that has mismanaged City Centre mall.
Oxford publicly owned iirc (Ontario Teachers)...so management is used to not being accountable. Just provide a good ROI and the Owners could care less about what happens otherwise.
     
     
  #2077  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 3:42 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 7,259
Developer Gene Dub says construction will start this summer on the long-awaited redevelopment of the site that neighbours call an eyesore, now that the $6-million job of removing asbestos from the building appears be complete.

This time is different than previous false starts, says Dub, who, along with a handful of investors, bought the property for $3.6 million in 2004. They were unaware of the extent of the asbestos contamination that would cost six times more than expected and take years longer to remove. The process has been so lengthy that of the original eight investors, four remain.

Dub is expecting a report from an environmental engineer showing the remediation of the 1960s-era hospital is complete. That will enable the company to apply for construction financing.


http://edmontonjournal.com/business/loca...-on-former-edmonton-hospital-and-eyesore
     
     
  #2078  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 3:05 PM
Hardhatdan Hardhatdan is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2003
Posts: 4,328
Quote:
Originally Posted by EdmTrekker View Post
Oxford publicly owned iirc (Ontario Teachers)...so management is used to not being accountable. Just provide a good ROI and the Owners could care less about what happens otherwise.
This is just ridiculous.
     
     
  #2079  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 3:17 PM
CMD UW's Avatar
CMD UW CMD UW is offline
Urbis Maximus
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 12,009
Quote:
Originally Posted by Hallsy's Toupee View Post
Oxford. The same company that has mismanaged City Centre mall.
As a tenant in one of their buildings I can say that they maintain their properties very well. The common areas are always clean and their staff is very friendly. Claiming that the mall has been 'mismanaged' is off base. You have to understand that it is not local management that decides when and how much they want to reinvest in upgrading their property, that decision is made by senior leadership.
__________________
"Call me sir, goddammit!"
     
     
  #2080  
Old Posted Apr 10, 2016, 4:39 PM
s211 s211 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Location: The People's Glorious Republic of ... Sigh...
Posts: 8,518
Quote:
Originally Posted by CMD UW View Post
As a tenant in one of their buildings I can say that they maintain their properties very well. The common areas are always clean and their staff is very friendly. Claiming that the mall has been 'mismanaged' is off base. You have to understand that it is not local management that decides when and how much they want to reinvest in upgrading their property, that decision is made by senior leadership.
True that, although for all the bumph you get from the pension funds about responsible investing, triple bottom line especially, you think they would have shown more forward thinking.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Triple_bottom_line
__________________
If it seems I'm ignoring what you may have written in response to something I have written, it's very likely that you're on my Ignore List. Please do not take it personally.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Alberta & British Columbia > Edmonton
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:37 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.