HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #11001  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 2:52 AM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
Philly -> Osaka -> Tokyo
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The biggest city on earth. Literally
Posts: 5,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly-Drew View Post
Good points. I've done some business in HBG and met Eagles fans there too. But, most of the people I've met had more of a HBG identity than anything else. But true, Philly's metro area gets jaded. Almost anywhere else in the US and it would be the epicenter of its entire region.
Most of the people in the Lehigh Valley have more of a Lehigh Valley identity than anything else. Most of the people in the Scranton-Wilkes-Barre area have more of a Scranton-Wilkes-Barre identity than anything else. Most of the people in the Hartford area have more of a Hartford identity than anything else. Most of the people in the Shenandoah Valley have more of a Shenandoah identity than anything else. Most of the people in the Hagerstown area have more of a Hagerstown identity than anything else.

Yet somehow none of this matters ... except when it comes to creating a reason make Philly and Harrisburg separate CSAs.
__________________
Urban Rambles | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11002  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 3:58 AM
Koernerstr32 Koernerstr32 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 40
General question to hammer and summers: why not consolidate the PHILLY highrise and lowrise/General development threads into 1? The last 2+ pages of the highrise thread was about general banter that should have been part of the lowrise/General thread but had nothing to do with highrise development. And many times highrise and lowrise threads tend to be about the same topic anyway via double posts. Call the combined thread "PHILLY Development". Just a thought...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11003  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 5:01 AM
Cro Burnham's Avatar
Cro Burnham Cro Burnham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: delco
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koernerstr32 View Post
General question to hammer and summers: why not consolidate the PHILLY highrise and lowrise/General development threads into 1? The last 2+ pages of the highrise thread was about general banter that should have been part of the lowrise/General thread but had nothing to do with highrise development. And many times highrise and lowrise threads tend to be about the same topic anyway via double posts. Call the combined thread "PHILLY Development". Just a thought...
Pretty sure that's the way is was a few years back. But a city has serious bragging rights when it gets its own separate thread for <12 story developments. This is important to those of us who measure our personhood in terms of hometown development stats. Why else do you think folks get excited by page and post counts? Meaningless yet somehow important.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11004  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 11:17 AM
BenKatzPhillytoParis BenKatzPhillytoParis is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 313
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cro Burnham View Post
Pretty sure that's the way is was a few years back. But a city has serious bragging rights when it gets its own separate thread for <12 story developments. This is important to those of us who measure our personhood in terms of hometown development stats. Why else do you think folks get excited by page and post counts? Meaningless yet somehow important.
Please can we not have this debate for the 50th time? I really think the current system works fine. Most of the time, the two threads have distinct discussions.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11005  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 3:15 PM
Philly-Drew's Avatar
Philly-Drew Philly-Drew is offline
Φιλαδέλφεια
 
Join Date: Feb 2005
Location: NoLibs
Posts: 1,395
Quote:
Originally Posted by Koernerstr32 View Post
General question to hammer and summers: why not consolidate the PHILLY highrise and lowrise/General development threads into 1? The last 2+ pages of the highrise thread was about general banter that should have been part of the lowrise/General thread but had nothing to do with highrise development. And many times highrise and lowrise threads tend to be about the same topic anyway via double posts. Call the combined thread "PHILLY Development". Just a thought...
I don't like the idea of combining the threads, at all. I'd rather go to one place for low rise information, and another page for highrise information. But Koernerstr32 is bringing up some great points, worthy of discussion. There have been too many double posts in each thread and other threads. I realize that there may be times where it makes sense to double post, but we've had too much of that from time to time.

Also, the unrelated discussions should go to a different thread altogether. We should have a Philly general topic thread (maybe we already do?), where anything goes; politics, taxes, school systems, power lines, sanitation, etc. that would get us to a place where we more easily get to the information we want to get to.
__________________
"Imagine all the people, living life in peace." :Lennon
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11006  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 4:06 PM
Knight Hospitaller's Avatar
Knight Hospitaller Knight Hospitaller is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2015
Location: Greater Philadelphia
Posts: 2,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by BenKatzPhillytoParis View Post
Please can we not have this debate for the 50th time? I really think the current system works fine. Most of the time, the two threads have distinct discussions.
"We've always done it this way" is a very Philly response.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11007  
Old Posted Mar 25, 2016, 4:35 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
Philly -> Osaka -> Tokyo
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The biggest city on earth. Literally
Posts: 5,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly-Drew View Post
I don't like the idea of combining the threads, at all. I'd rather go to one place for low rise information, and another page for highrise information. But Koernerstr32 is bringing up some great points, worthy of discussion. There have been too many double posts in each thread and other threads. I realize that there may be times where it makes sense to double post, but we've had too much of that from time to time.

Also, the unrelated discussions should go to a different thread altogether. We should have a Philly general topic thread (maybe we already do?), where anything goes; politics, taxes, school systems, power lines, sanitation, etc. that would get us to a place where we more easily get to the information we want to get to.
If I did that, it would have to go into the Northeast section. I've also been considering forking the threads and having two development threads Summers updates in City Comps while having a general chatter thread in the Northeast section (kind of like the Mountain West cities).

Some of this would require some serious forum reorganization, though.
__________________
Urban Rambles | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11008  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2016, 1:49 AM
summersm343's Avatar
summersm343 summersm343 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Oct 2011
Location: Philadelphia
Posts: 18,469
Environmental firm relocates to Center City

Quote:
An environmental firm has relocated its offices in Fort Washington, Pa., to Center City.

GZA GeoEnvironmental Inc., an environmental and geotechnical consulting firm, has relocated into 4,629 square feet at 1515 Market St. in Philadelphia. They had been in space at 501 W. Office Center Drive.

The company will have an initial 10 employees working from the downtown office space and anticipate growing from there.

“The location is across the street from City Hall and conveniently located to public transportation,” the company said in a statement. “The downtown presence offers clients easier access to GZA and provides the professional staff an opportunity to be part of the broader business community.

GZA is headquartered in Norwood, Mass. It has been in the Philadelphia region for more than 25 years.
http://www.bizjournals.com/philadelphia/...mental-moves-center-city-fort-washi.html
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11009  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2016, 12:09 PM
Jawnadelphia's Avatar
Jawnadelphia Jawnadelphia is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Location: Wilmington, Delaware
Posts: 2,906
One Franklin Plaza - transition moving forward,

[IMG]Untitled

[IMG]Untitled
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11010  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2016, 4:00 PM
EastSideHBG's Avatar
EastSideHBG EastSideHBG is offline
Me?!?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Philadelphia Metro
Posts: 10,805
Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier View Post
I'm aware of people who commute from Philly to Harrisburg on the Keystone. Granted, that's a tiny tiny subset, but I find it hard to believe that our state's capital would look to an out-of-state city. The business of Harrisburg, after all, is governing Pennsylvania, not Maryland.
I get what you are saying but I lived in Harrisburg for many years and a majority of the people spent their time and money in Baltimore vs Philly when going to a bigger city. Baltimore Co. is only one county aware from Harrisburg, there's many counties in between Harrisburg and Philly (and those counties have their own very clear identities). There are Eagles fans and what not in Harrisburg but way more Steelers fans and while Pittsburgh is much further away than Philly is, I found more similarities between those two cities' mindsets than HBG and Philly if you are comparing big cities within the PA borders.

York County also draws HBG commuters (not as much as it used to, though, as York has really developed its own identity) and that drags one even further away from Philly and closer to Baltimore.

Quote:
The larger point here, though, is the obvious double standard in play. If DC's CSA is measured such that it goes out to Hagerstown, then Philly's should include Harrisburg. Period.
Where are people in Hagerstown working? Spending their money? What economy is drawing its residents? If you are comparing Hagerstown to DC and then Harrisburg to Philly in this regard, it's not even a comparison.

Quote:
Otherwise the sole difference in CSA size is the fact that DC CSA gets the Baltimore conurbation.

To further elaborate: I'm not entirely sure I can trust the Census's stated CSA methodology because the fact that Lancaster isn't in Harrisburg's CSA makes me call bull. Any idiot with half a brain can tell that the northwest part of Lancaster County is clearly within Harrisburg's commute shed. In other words, however well their stated methodology might work for cities like Denver or Salt Lake where there is jack squat outside the conurbation, the borders in Pennsylvania have been defined in a very arbitrary manner.
Lancaster has its own identity and is giving HBG a run for its money and quite frankly I like Lancaster better, its DT is now leaps and bounds better than HBG's as far activity levels go and only getting better. HBG's current leadership is AWFUL and it continues to stagnate while Lancaster is moving forward. Also, I know far more HBG commuters heading towards Lancaster to work vs the other way around. In South Central PA one can't just look at a map and say, "Oh these all should be together," because it doesn't work like that, it's a very territorial and disconnected place and a mere 15 miles can make you feel like you are on another planet. HBG has the state government but outside of that there's not much you can get in HBG that you can't get in other parts of the region.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Philly-Drew View Post
Good points. I've done some business in HBG and met Eagles fans there too. But, most of the people I've met had more of. HBG identity than anything else. But true, Philly's metro area gets jaded. Almost anywhere else in the US and it would be the epicenter of its entire region.
That's because other places in the U.S. aren't built like PA is. When you go to many of the newer sunbelt cities you have the big city and then NOTHING. Here in this part of the country one could live a very comfortable life and never have to set foot in the big city for anything.

I love Philly and of course economically it is very important to the state but due to its location and with how big our state is and all of the regional identities, it doesn't have the draw you may think it does once you hit a certain point.
__________________
Right before your eyes you're victimized, guys, that's the world of today and it ain't civilized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11011  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2016, 7:40 PM
hammersklavier's Avatar
hammersklavier hammersklavier is offline
Philly -> Osaka -> Tokyo
 
Join Date: Apr 2008
Location: The biggest city on earth. Literally
Posts: 5,630
Quote:
Originally Posted by EastSideHBG View Post
I get what you are saying but I lived in Harrisburg for many years and a majority of the people spent their time and money in Baltimore vs Philly when going to a bigger city. Baltimore Co. is only one county aware from Harrisburg, there's many counties in between Harrisburg and Philly (and those counties have their own very clear identities). There are Eagles fans and what not in Harrisburg but way more Steelers fans and while Pittsburgh is much further away than Philly is, I found more similarities between those two cities' mindsets than HBG and Philly if you are comparing big cities within the PA borders.

York County also draws HBG commuters (not as much as it used to, though, as York has really developed its own identity) and that drags one even further away from Philly and closer to Baltimore.


Where are people in Hagerstown working? Spending their money? What economy is drawing its residents? If you are comparing Hagerstown to DC and then Harrisburg to Philly in this regard, it's not even a comparison.
This is my point exactly. The Lehigh Valley, Reading, Lancaster, Harrisburg, York, Carlisle, Hagerstown, Frederick, Winchester -- on down all the way to at least Roanoke -- is a region of microcregions. Hagerstown's connection to DC is quite as tenuous as Harrisburg's is to Philly or Baltimore (in fact, I'd suggest that if you look at road links, Hagerstown has a slightly stronger connection to Baltimore), and DC itself is the upstart in this part of the country. I can guarantee you that, until recently, the Shenandoah Valley did not look to DC as "the city" (though I dunno whether they'd've looked towards Tidewater or Baltimore) -- yet there Winchester is in the DC CSA.

I'd argue that Hagerstown has about as strong a commute linkage to Baltimore and DC as Lancaster and Harrisburg do to Philly.

Hence either you consider both Harrisburg and Hagerstown their own separate CSAs -- or you consider neither. The cultural-region density is high around here, but if you analyze most of the East enough, you'll find that it isn't abnormally high. Delmarva Tidewater is a different beast than eastern North Carolina Tidewater ... that doesn't mean they aren't both part of Tidewater.
Quote:
Lancaster has its own identity and is giving HBG a run for its money and quite frankly I like Lancaster better, its DT is now leaps and bounds better than HBG's as far activity levels go and only getting better. HBG's current leadership is AWFUL and it continues to stagnate while Lancaster is moving forward. Also, I know far more HBG commuters heading towards Lancaster to work vs the other way around. In South Central PA one can't just look at a map and say, "Oh these all should be together," because it doesn't work like that, it's a very territorial and disconnected place and a mere 15 miles can make you feel like you are on another planet. HBG has the state government but outside of that there's not much you can get in HBG that you can't get in other parts of the region.
The point here is that the Census CSA definitions are supposed to be set quantitatively. Obviously Lancaster County has commute sheds into three different CSAs under the current definition -- as well as its own MSA. I agree that Lancaster is a more pleasant city than Harrisburg (which, like most governance cities, has a weird sterility to it). The problem is that in the Northeast, there's a point where quantitative measurements break down -- the entire Northeast would, after all, be part of the New York CSA under a strict quantitative measurement because the commute sheds all interlink -- which means qualitative biases got introduced, and those biases clearly disfavor Philadelphia.

After all, the Lehigh Valley is -- and has always been -- culturally more closely linked to Philadelphia than New York. Does it, then, make sense that it's part of New York's CSA absent a New York bias? Of course not.
Quote:
That's because other places in the U.S. aren't built like PA is. When you go to many of the newer sunbelt cities you have the big city and then NOTHING. Here in this part of the country one could live a very comfortable life and never have to set foot in the big city for anything.

I love Philly and of course economically it is very important to the state but due to its location and with how big our state is and all of the regional identities, it doesn't have the draw you may think it does once you hit a certain point.
That, however, is true for the vast tracts of the West. The Mid-Atlantic is an old region, and like the country's other old (and even adolescent *Midwest* *Appalachia*) regions, it is highly fragmented into distinct subregions.

When it comes to Boston, New York, and DC, it's clear that the Census seems to have decided that if there was one commuter between the two regions they should count as part of the CSA. They didn't hold that standard to Philadelphia. That's a double standard, and it's bullshit.
__________________
Urban Rambles | Hidden City

Who knows but that, on the lower levels, I speak for you?’ (Ralph Ellison, Invisible Man)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11012  
Old Posted Mar 26, 2016, 9:09 PM
jjv007 jjv007 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Posts: 669
Good points all around EastSideHBG and hammersklavier. While I think that perhaps the Philly area doesn't stretch to the whole area suggested by hammersklavier when he argued a 9 million plus metro population for Philly, it's definitely getting ripped off by at least a few million. The New York bias is clearly evident in Philly's case. In fact, when Mercer County moved into New York's MSA I believe it was the first major instance in the country where a region's television markets did not match its metro designations. A similar argument could be made for the Lehigh Valley and other areas.
I also think there's a definite DC bias especially when a city like Baltimore is just almost casually lumped in with it. Baltimore is a prominent city in its own regard and while not as economically vibrant as DC currently, it has a history far richer and farther than the nation's capital.
As for the case of Boston, there really is no bias necessary as it anchors its own region in New England (save for Providence). I don't think people really care about Boston's population anyway (city or metro) because despite the fact that it is well behind many others and not growing at a particularly high rate, it is seen as a rich, economically viable, premier American city. There is definitely truth to the above as Boston has done well for itself and anchors or coanchors several major economic sectors but I feel like there's a double standard for the city population-wise. Whereas Philly is being derided by outsiders as declining for a relatively low growth rate and being passed by several cities in the population department, those sort of criticisms don't seem to come Boston's way.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11013  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2016, 5:03 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Let's just steal all North Carolina's Fortune 500 companies. They are none too happy with the guvner right now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11014  
Old Posted Mar 27, 2016, 6:51 PM
Cro Burnham's Avatar
Cro Burnham Cro Burnham is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Location: delco
Posts: 2,396
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
Let's just steal all North Carolina's Fortune 500 companies. They are none too happy with the guvner right now.
Unfortunately, I think most big corporations ultimately find low tax laissez-faire business environments more attractive than they find repressive civil rights regimes repellent, regardless of their clamorous pleas to the contrary.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11015  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2016, 12:38 AM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by Cro Burnham View Post
Unfortunately, I think most big corporations ultimately find low tax laissez-faire business environments more attractive than they find repressive civil rights regimes repellent, regardless of their clamorous pleas to the contrary.
Yes, methinks you are right. Sadly. Social policies and repressive civil rights regimes will only matter at the margins as between two otherwise comparable locations as far as policies that are more meaningful to companies.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11016  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2016, 3:42 AM
allovertown allovertown is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 1,338
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
Yes, methinks you are right. Sadly. Social policies and repressive civil rights regimes will only matter at the margins as between two otherwise comparable locations as far as policies that are more meaningful to companies.
Yup. Complaining about bigoted policies is free. Moving to a state with higher taxes to make a stand against said bigoted policies? Ha. I'll believe it when I see it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11017  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2016, 2:49 PM
br323206 br323206 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Posts: 447
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
Yes, methinks you are right. Sadly. Social policies and repressive civil rights regimes will only matter at the margins as between two otherwise comparable locations as far as policies that are more meaningful to companies.
There is a lot of research though that shows that tax policy only matters at the margins too. Ultimately, where the CEO prefers to live (and a thousand other variables) has more of an effect than either social or tax policy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11018  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2016, 3:11 PM
jsbrook jsbrook is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2014
Location: Bala Cynwyd
Posts: 3,658
Quote:
Originally Posted by br323206 View Post
There is a lot of research though that shows that tax policy only matters at the margins too. Ultimately, where the CEO prefers to live (and a thousand other variables) has more of an effect than either social or tax policy.
Maybe for Fortune 500 companies (though I think that is less true in this day of activist funds trying to squeeze out every last ounce of shareholder value). It is more than a marginal issue for smaller businesses.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11019  
Old Posted Mar 28, 2016, 3:17 PM
EastSideHBG's Avatar
EastSideHBG EastSideHBG is offline
Me?!?
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Philadelphia Metro
Posts: 10,805
hammersklavier, I completely understand your points but I suppose I look at it through a different lens because I have a lot of experience with all of these regions (including Baltimore/DC) and the Philly region feels a little more disconnected to me from the others once you leave a certain point. Lebanon Co. is not too far for example and a good comparison but when there you barely know Philly exists vs when you are in Washington Co., MD (Hagerstown) you definitely know Baltimore/DC exists...hard to put into words but you can feel the cohesiveness.

Would it make sense for CSAs to be a little more uniform and fair? Absolutely, but I feel that there needs to be some thought behind it too vs arbitrary lines on a map.

Quote:
Originally Posted by hammersklavier View Post
After all, the Lehigh Valley is -- and has always been -- culturally more closely linked to Philadelphia than New York. Does it, then, make sense that it's part of New York's CSA absent a New York bias? Of course not.
I would have agreed with you up until say the last 3 years or so, many of the Allentown people I know work in NY now and no longer in Philly. Their families have moved into the area from NYC and with random meetings through business and what not I have found more and more connections to NYC and the pendulum seems to be swinging. Using Allentown for an example, is an extra 30 miles that big of a deal when you can be in one of the epicenters of the world? This is where I go back to saying there needs to be some thought to CSAs and not just what things look like on a map.

Quote:
Originally Posted by jjv007 View Post
Good points all around EastSideHBG and hammersklavier. While I think that perhaps the Philly area doesn't stretch to the whole area suggested by hammersklavier when he argued a 9 million plus metro population for Philly, it's definitely getting ripped off by at least a few million. The New York bias is clearly evident in Philly's case. In fact, when Mercer County moved into New York's MSA I believe it was the first major instance in the country where a region's television markets did not match its metro designations. A similar argument could be made for the Lehigh Valley and other areas.
I also think there's a definite DC bias especially when a city like Baltimore is just almost casually lumped in with it. Baltimore is a prominent city in its own regard and while not as economically vibrant as DC currently, it has a history far richer and farther than the nation's capital.
As for the case of Boston, there really is no bias necessary as it anchors its own region in New England (save for Providence). I don't think people really care about Boston's population anyway (city or metro) because despite the fact that it is well behind many others and not growing at a particularly high rate, it is seen as a rich, economically viable, premier American city. There is definitely truth to the above as Boston has done well for itself and anchors or coanchors several major economic sectors but I feel like there's a double standard for the city population-wise. Whereas Philly is being derided by outsiders as declining for a relatively low growth rate and being passed by several cities in the population department, those sort of criticisms don't seem to come Boston's way.
Good points!
__________________
Right before your eyes you're victimized, guys, that's the world of today and it ain't civilized.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #11020  
Old Posted Mar 29, 2016, 3:23 AM
wanderer34 wanderer34 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Miami/somewhere in paradise
Posts: 1,705
Quote:
Originally Posted by jsbrook View Post
Let's just steal all North Carolina's Fortune 500 companies. They are none too happy with the guvner right now.
I'd take Mack Trucks from Greensboro and place them back in Allentown. That company doesn't belong in NC at all!!!
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Global Projects & Construction > City Compilations
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.