HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #341  
Old Posted Jan 27, 2016, 12:23 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Wow! The land reclamation begins! Very exciting...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #342  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 10:49 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,392
City should sell downtown housing for new affordable units on west harbour:
A consultant has recommended building hundreds of affordable-housing units on the former Rheem property at Barton and Tiffany.

Hamilton Spectator
By Matthew Van Dongen
http://www.thespec.com/news-story/626997...affordable-units-on-west-harbour-report/

A consultant says the city's social housing provider should build hundreds of new affordable units on Hamilton's failed stadium lands using cash from the sale of two existing north-end complexes.

The Deloitte report, previewed at a city subcommittee today, suggests CityHousing Hamilton should sell its Jamesville townhouse complex as well as an aging apartment tower on MacNab Street. Those properties represent about 236 social housing units, although many are currently vacant.

That cash could be used to nearly double the number of north-end units to 400, the report says, if the city is willing to build anew on the Barton-Tiffany lands once intended for a west-harbour football stadium.

The recommendations have not been endorsed by either city council or CityHousing's board of directors.

But the social housing agency has been studying how to add more units and deal with aging housing stock — including more than 100 vacant units that are too damaged to use and too expensive to fix.

The report comes as public criticism grows about Hamilton's plans to redevelop the west harbour, particularly on Piers 7 and 8. The city hopes to encourage development of 1,500 units at the water — but area residents have pushed for dedicated affordable housing to be a part of the land sale and development.

More to come.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #343  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 11:35 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,786
Or you know, we could just not ship everyone out of the area and the build the new units as extra since there's a waiting list thousands long...
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #344  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 12:25 AM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
I'd rather see smaller affordable apartment buildings built around the city instead of these megablocks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #345  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 12:59 AM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by matt602 View Post
Or you know, we could just not ship everyone out of the area and the build the new units as extra since there's a waiting list thousands long...
Thing is they dont have enough money to renovate the current units which arent usable. The land they sit on is valuable. They can sell that land at a profit and build double the amount of new units in city areas where the land isnt as valuable.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #346  
Old Posted Feb 10, 2016, 4:19 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,493
No reason why there cannot be a mix of market and affordable housing. This is the thing that some people don't seem to get.

With respect to this idea, it may make sense and its worth a discussion. Let a private enterprise buy and redevelop the building the city cannot afford to, and put (or mandate) new affordable units among the other new developments in the west harbour area.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #347  
Old Posted Feb 24, 2016, 3:34 PM
NortheastWind NortheastWind is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 639
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #348  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2016, 3:18 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,493
"The new steel" is getting stale as a tagline.

But diversification of the port is still a great story. Even if the Spec has been writing such stories months before the G&M did. (though the latter source will bring much more national attention )
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #349  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2016, 3:34 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,797
Can carbon nanotubes be the next new steel?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #350  
Old Posted Feb 25, 2016, 3:42 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,493
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
Can carbon nanotubes be the next new steel?
Carbon Nanotube City has a ring to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #351  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2016, 7:14 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,392
Is it time to give up the dream of swimming in Hamilton Harbour?
The decades long dream is stalled, solutions are elusive. What do you think should be done?

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/hamilton/n...f-swimming-in-hamilton-harbour-1.3498204

It's been 23 years since Bob Morrow and his city council created Bayfront Beach, a man-made horseshoe at Bayfront Park designated for swimming.

And despite Public Health this week declaring it should be closed over unsafe water quality, the former mayor still isn't ready to give up on the dream of Hamiltonians being able to take a dip in their harbour.

Hamilton Public Health officials have recommended closing the beach, calling it "not suitable" as a recreation area. Officially to be closed for the year, the department says it shouldn't reopen until the problem of unsafe water quality is solved.

But the harbour restoration effort has been trying to do that for the past two decades, without success.

'We should keep trying to clean it up and keep investing.'
- Bob Morrow, former mayor
The Public Health report raises the question: with the area marred by E. coli and blue green algae, and unsafe for swimming more often than not, is it time to give up the dream of swimming in the bay?

Morrow, a vocal champion of a cleaner harbour in his time in office, says no.

"We should keep trying to clean it up and keep investing," he said.

People can walk and cycle there, and enjoy the outdoors there. But swimming needs to be part of it, he said.

"It's all part of a clean harbour."

That quest — to make the bay a spot where families take their kids to swim, where sunbathers bob in up to their necks, where fish species flourish — has been going on for generations.

A 'most beautiful septic tank'

Swimming in the harbour was officially banned in the 1930s. In 1958, a Toronto urban planning professor called Hamilton's bay "the world's largest and most beautiful septic tank," says a Hamilton Spectator article from 2002. That was five years after the bay spent most of a summer "ringed by an oil slick 'from canal to canal, from shore to shore.'"

"That summer, it gleamed from the thick oil and bubbled from the gases created by decaying human waste," the article says.

In 1987, the International Joint Commission identified the harbour as one of 43 troubled areas, and a remedial action plan was born.

The plan, hugely successful in so many of its goals, has found the highly-symbolic target of making it clean enough for swimming frustratingly elusive.

There has been progress and the overall water quality in the harbour is vastly improved as the harbour cleanup recorded significant successes. Recent leaps forward include upgrades to the city's Woodward Avenue water treatment plant, and the impending clean up of Randle Reef, a massive underwater coal tar deposit.

There have been high profile events over the years to show that swimming there is possible. Morrow jumped into the water on a dare from local media in the 1980s — and survived. Former MP Sheila Copps swam there to much fanfare in the 1990s.

In 1993, Morrow's council opened Bayfront Park —on lands reclaimed from a former landfill — to give Hamiltonians more access to the harbour. Bayfront Beach stemmed from a remedial action plan recommendation.

The beach is symbolic of the health of the harbour, Morrow said. It's improving, so let's keep going.

Those darn geese

"I don't think we ever want to give up on trying to clean it up," he said.

But the e-coli issues at the beach and in the waters close to it have proven unsolvable so far, despite a variety of efforts tried over the years.

Public Health says the causes of beach pollution are as follows:

The presence of Canada geese and gulls.
Poor water circulation.
Surface water runoff onto the beach.
The slope of the beach.
Moisture of the beach sand and proximity to the water table.
Public Health is doing a water quality study with the help of AECOM Canada Engineering Consultants. The city will hold public consultations, then do a study due by the end of summer.

The city expects recommendations as early as 2017.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #352  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2016, 7:16 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is online now
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,392
Wouldn't a geyser be a simple solution to scare the geese away? Plus it would look nice.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #353  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2016, 11:40 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
Oh dear.

Used to live at West Harbour and would often see people - typically new Canadians - swimming in the harbour. How could they know just how toxic it is? Cringe worthy on so many counts...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #354  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 1:59 AM
ScreamingViking's Avatar
ScreamingViking ScreamingViking is offline
Ham-burgher
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 7,493
Why is a beach necessary there anyway? The park owes none of its great success to a small strip of artificially placed sand. I never understood why it was there in the first place.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #355  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 3:02 AM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,797
I never understood the appeal of beaches in general. Let alone one on an industrial harbour that's one of the busiest one the Great Lakes.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #356  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 10:56 AM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
'I never understood the appeal of beaches in general.'

Even if you don't like the sun, is a bikini such a terrible thing?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #357  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 12:36 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,797
I'm rather indifferent to them, and you can see them at a swimming pool if you really want to, and the pool will have cleaner water and none of the annoying sand. The only benefit to a beach is kids getting to build sandcastles.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #358  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 2:27 PM
Dr Awesomesauce's Avatar
Dr Awesomesauce Dr Awesomesauce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: BEYOND THE OUTER RIM
Posts: 5,889
^Well, you're a barrel of laughs...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #359  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 2:46 PM
Beedok Beedok is offline
Exiled Hamiltonian Gal
 
Join Date: Jun 2012
Posts: 6,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dr Awesomesauce View Post
^Well, you're a barrel of laughs...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #360  
Old Posted Mar 21, 2016, 2:54 PM
davidcappi's Avatar
davidcappi davidcappi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2013
Posts: 1,992
Perfect spot for a boardwalk with covered tables & chairs. Could host food trucks and be a space for events instead of useless sand.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Urban, Urban Design & Heritage Issues
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 6:43 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.