Quote:
Originally Posted by PHL10
I think they could have done much worse but considering that more land area is devoted to parking and driveways than housing, I have a major problem with that development. In a neighborhood where the land is so valuable that a parking space can cost upwards of $30,000, I’m not sure how you justify their land use.
|
Quote:
Originally Posted by br323206
I think their approach to parking and driveways definitely leaves a lot to be desired. Overall though, it's a successful project. Hopefully they've learned that "alleys" don't need to be 30 feet wide.
|
Unfortunately, I've heard that some federal grants are tied to parking requirements. So if you want to build affordable housing, you have to bundle
x amount of parking in. While this is manifestly excessive (much better to just fund a bikeshare station in your project area where bikeshare exists, at this point), bureaucrats can be sticklers about crossing every T and dotting every I ... I wouldn't be surprised if the excessively wide alleys are a product of parking requirements out of the financing of the project here -- very different from projects where we're seeing developers propose
excess parking because that extra spot is itself a marketable amenity.