HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture


    The St. Regis Chicago in the SkyscraperPage Database

Building Data Page   • Comparison Diagram   • Chicago Skyscraper Diagram

Map Location
Chicago Projects & Construction Forum

Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #1261  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 12:47 PM
the urban politician the urban politician is offline
The City
 
Join Date: Jul 2004
Location: Chicago region
Posts: 21,373
Quote:
Originally Posted by munchymunch View Post
And that's only to the end of 2015.
I think they are saying that lenders want 50% sales these days.

However, if the developers/investors are putting in a lot more equity (ie Wanda putting in a couple hundred mil) perhaps the standards are much lighter?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1262  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 8:16 PM
rlw777 rlw777 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Posts: 1,792
It's going to be cool seeing this and One Bennett Park rise at the same time.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1263  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 8:34 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by the urban politician View Post
I think they are saying that lenders want 50% sales these days.

However, if the developers/investors are putting in a lot more equity (ie Wanda putting in a couple hundred mil) perhaps the standards are much lighter?
Yeah 50% is nice, though I think Wanda is a little interesting since the cheapest units basically start around $1M. Not your typical even half expensive $500K 1 bedroom condo tower.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1264  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 9:44 PM
Ryanrule Ryanrule is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 771
half expensive?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1265  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 9:48 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanrule View Post
half expensive?
$500K - not at the upper echelon of expensive buildings, but not cheap either. It's in the middle for a downtown "expensive" building. My point is that the units in Wanda are expensive - basically a minimum of $1M. Although it didn't sell 50%, it sold 30-33% which is still, in my opinion, positive, for this type of building.
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1266  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 9:51 PM
LouisVanDerWright LouisVanDerWright is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2012
Posts: 7,451
FYI there were multiple McHugh trucks on site again today. This project is showing rumbles of life.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1267  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 2:31 PM
Ryanrule Ryanrule is offline
BANNED
 
Join Date: Sep 2013
Posts: 771
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
$500K - not at the upper echelon of expensive buildings, but not cheap either. It's in the middle for a downtown "expensive" building. My point is that the units in Wanda are expensive - basically a minimum of $1M. Although it didn't sell 50%, it sold 30-33% which is still, in my opinion, positive, for this type of building.
500k for a one bedroom is extremely expensive.
1M + for a one bedroom is a drugged fantasy for 99.5% of people.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1268  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 4:49 PM
marothisu marothisu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Chicago
Posts: 6,931
Quote:
Originally Posted by Ryanrule View Post
500k for a one bedroom is extremely expensive.
1M + for a one bedroom is a drugged fantasy for 99.5% of people.
That wasn't my point. $500K for a 1 bedroom isn't in the upper echelon of expensive places in Chicago. but yes, it's expensive for Chicago. No denying that, but the $500K types of places sell more in pre-sales. $1M is much more than $500K
__________________
Chicago Maps:
* New Construction https://www.google.com/maps/d/viewer...B0&usp=sharing
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1269  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 5:18 PM
sage's Avatar
sage sage is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Chicago
Posts: 51
Quote:
Originally Posted by marothisu View Post
$1M is much more than $500K
I'd wager it's nearly double.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1270  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2016, 5:28 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,948


Google translating the terrible Wanda Hotels website gives us an exact opening date of December 18, 2018.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1271  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2016, 6:47 PM
SteelMonkey SteelMonkey is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2016
Location: Chicago
Posts: 349
Google translating the terrible Wanda Hotels website gives us an exact opening date of December 18, 2018.[/QUOTE]

Wow that's aggressive.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1272  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2016, 7:20 PM
munchymunch's Avatar
munchymunch munchymunch is offline
MPLSXCHI
 
Join Date: Feb 2014
Location: Omicron Persei 8
Posts: 1,161
Quote:
Originally Posted by SteelMonkey View Post
Google translating the terrible Wanda Hotels website gives us an exact opening date of December 18, 2018.
Wow that's aggressive.[/QUOTE]

That's probably just for the hotel, not the condos.
__________________
"I don't want to be interesting. I want to be good." -Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1273  
Old Posted Mar 19, 2016, 9:50 PM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,710
^ From my 10/26/15 Notes...

occupancy 2019 for lower condominiums
hotel early 2020
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1274  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2016, 12:35 AM
Kumdogmillionaire's Avatar
Kumdogmillionaire Kumdogmillionaire is offline
Development Shill
 
Join Date: Nov 2015
Location: San Antonio
Posts: 1,136
Then the website is just super outdated, neat
__________________
For you - Bane
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1275  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2016, 3:12 AM
BVictor1's Avatar
BVictor1 BVictor1 is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Chicago
Posts: 10,710
http://www.chicagobusiness.com/reale...vel-sales-tool

March 29, 2016
Jeanne Gang-designed tower boasts a novel sales tool
By Dennis Rodkin

Quote:
The sales center for a proposed 93-story tower designed by Jeanne Gang offers buyer a chance to see views that don't even exist yet.

A virtual elevator ride will let prospective buyers stop at various points in the nearly 1,200-foot-high tower to look out over downtown and Lake Michigan.

As visitors gaze out through three full-sized walls of glass showing a 73rd-floor view over the Chicago River and up the lakefront at dusk, the building's sales staff can take them to another place with a mere swipe on an iPad.

Quote:
Losik said prices will average $1,000 a square foot, and another Magellan sales executive recently told Crain's they go as high as $1,750 a foot, which will put these units in the upper tier of the Chicago condo market. Each floor from 71 through 91 will be a full-floor condo, with 360-degree views.
To get around the paywall, copy and past the name of the article into your preferred search engine. That should do it.
__________________
titanic1
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1276  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2016, 3:12 PM
Kngkyle Kngkyle is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: Chicago
Posts: 3,125
^^^

Quote:
The changeable, simulated view is accomplished via 52 flat-screen monitors filling three walls and knitted together electronically to show one gigantic image, as shot by drone cameras that were sent up from the site last summer.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1277  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2016, 3:17 PM
spyguy's Avatar
spyguy spyguy is offline
THAT Guy
 
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 5,948
The website has been updated with a lot of info: vistatowerchicago.com








Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1278  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2016, 3:29 PM
ithakas's Avatar
ithakas ithakas is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2014
Posts: 1,038
The design details of this project are fantastic. The prismatic ceilings of the lobby, the slanted columns, the subtle tapering of the tower by slightly reduced floorplates (like a more subtle, cohesive 56 Leonard). It looks pretty damn good in the skyline, too. But good God, is luxury real estate marketing ever cheesy.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1279  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2016, 4:02 PM
aaron38's Avatar
aaron38 aaron38 is offline
312
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Palatine
Posts: 4,335
Nice, I got a new wallpaper.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #1280  
Old Posted Mar 30, 2016, 4:28 PM
r18tdi's Avatar
r18tdi r18tdi is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2013
Location: Chicago
Posts: 2,785
This pool does not suck:


Curbed
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Discussion Forums > Buildings & Architecture
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 8:49 AM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.