HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2381  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 10:46 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
Yup and one Bloor has 50 metre long caissons supporting it; half the length of Stantecs.
And it's taller than Stantec, but it is built over 2 subway lines.. and that also played a role in it taking such a 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵 long time... It's 2016 I clearly remember site clearing underway in 2010... good lord, skyscrapers are not easy..
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2382  
Old Posted Mar 15, 2016, 11:38 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
The difference in height has nothing to do with the below grade activities. Bedrock is 65 metres deep at Yonge and Bloor . The roughly 50 metre caisson foundation took a lot of time. Same with Stantec with caissons double as long. It is also built next to one subway line.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2383  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2016, 1:52 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
All I know, is that One Bloor took a damn long time, by the time it is complete it will easily have been 10 years from site clearing to completion probably a lot longer than that.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2384  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2016, 3:27 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Of course you know. I just told you.


Also, you're forgetting the bankruptcy, change in ownership and, redesign.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2385  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2016, 6:11 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,127
Quote:
Originally Posted by Chadillaccc View Post
Is it just me or is the Stantec and JW Marriott pits taking a really long time to start to rise. If memory serves, they reached the bottom of the pit before Telus Sky, and now Telus Sky's core is nearly out of its pit, the 3rd deepest pit ever excavated for a Canadian building.

http://i.imgur.com/OaxgZUN.jpg?1
Virex393 on C2E
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2386  
Old Posted Mar 16, 2016, 6:39 PM
koops65's Avatar
koops65 koops65 is offline
Intergalactic Barfly
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Quarks Bar
Posts: 8,806
Quote:
Originally Posted by caltrane74 View Post
All I know, is that One Bloor took a damn long time, by the time it is complete it will easily have been 10 years from site clearing to completion probably a lot longer than that.
Digging on site began Aug. 2011, so it's been 4 1/2 years so far...
Crane was installed Sept. 2012, so actual construction began 3 1/2 years ago...
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=179949&page=1

Last edited by koops65; Mar 16, 2016 at 6:55 PM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2387  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 1:02 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
So basically, I'm right.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2388  
Old Posted Mar 17, 2016, 2:19 AM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
^ I'm not sure you being right was the point of any of the ensuing conversation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2389  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 1:07 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
One Bloor

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2390  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 1:39 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2391  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 2:21 PM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
Jared Menkes posted this picture on LinkedIn a few days ago - Harbour Plaza Residences

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2392  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 2:53 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
All those millions of dollars in his pocket and this is the best picture he can do?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2393  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 3:06 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
What do millions of dollars in the pocket have to do with taking good pictures?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2394  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 3:15 PM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
What do millions of dollars in the pocket have to do with taking good pictures?
WS!! stop annoying me!!!

Are you trying to tell me he doesn't have a proper phone? or something. give me a break...
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2395  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 3:16 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
Not my intention at all. You say weird 🞵🞵🞵🞵. I have equipment with the latest stabilizing tech and pictures still turn out out of focus. Don't even get me started on phone shots. What does wealth have to do with it? A $100,000 phone is pretty much the same as the latest $1000 phone. The major different is the case.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2396  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 3:24 PM
Daveography's Avatar
Daveography Daveography is offline
Klatuu Barada Nikto
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Location: The Island of Misfit Architecture
Posts: 4,483
Looks more like it was blown up from a smaller badly-compressed version; given the source is LinkedIn I'm going to say that's very likely the case.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2397  
Old Posted Mar 18, 2016, 3:29 PM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Daveography View Post
Looks more like it was blown up from a smaller badly-compressed version; given the source is LinkedIn I'm going to say that's very likely the case.
That's exactly what I did
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2398  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2016, 1:52 AM
caltrane74's Avatar
caltrane74 caltrane74 is offline
gettin' rich!
 
Join Date: Aug 2002
Location: Toronto
Posts: 34,204
488 University - 207 meters (yesterday)

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2399  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2016, 3:00 AM
itom 987's Avatar
itom 987 itom 987 is offline
Moderator
 
Join Date: Aug 2003
Location: Edmonton
Posts: 5,086
I hope they do a good job with that project, it looks complex. I wouldn't want to see cracks in the walls due to the exterior and interior foundations settling at different rates.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #2400  
Old Posted Mar 20, 2016, 4:07 AM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
I am the law!
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Location: Toronto+
Posts: 22,895
It's all welded together sitting on a new foundation three storeys deeper than it was originally. Strong possibility it's now carved into bedrock.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:13 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.