Quote:
Originally Posted by Brutopian
Growth plan sparks debate on bridge, downtown
By Phil Tank, Saskatoon StarPhoenix
March 15, 2016
While much of the attention on Saskatoon’s new growth plan has focused on a controversial proposed bridge, city councillors raised concerns Monday about downtown office growth.
The overall focus of the plan aims at increasing density in core areas and shifting growth from new suburbs, which would require an improved transit system.
[........]
Read more:
http://thestarphoenix.com/news/local-news/growth-plan-sparks-debate-on-bridge-downtown
|
I like the other proposed bridge anyways. If the 33rd bridge does allow cars, spadina would not be able to handle the amount of traffic that would start using it. The 24th street bridge accomodates dedicated bus lanes which I believe is the next step for transit in this city.
Then I would make 25th one way, 24th one way, 23rd would be the shared bike lane road, 22nd would stay 2-way, 21st should become pedestrian walking street (if we could build a parkade some where since we can't afford to lose parking), and 20th stays 2-way. Not that I have spent a lot of time thinking about this though.