HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4681  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2016, 2:14 PM
Uhuniau Uhuniau is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 9,102
Dominion-Chalmers United Church faces uncertain financial future

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/dominion-chalmers-united-congregation-1.3427755
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4682  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2016, 9:11 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
Is there room for bikes to go around it or are cyclists getting squeezed into the remaining travel lane? (This stretch of Beechwood — for cycling. I got hit near this spot a few years ago.)
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4683  
Old Posted Feb 1, 2016, 10:34 PM
Vanier Vanier is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 90
Quote:
Originally Posted by zzptichka View Post
So much fuss about one little parklet?
Wonder why is BIA paying for it and not the restaurant itself? Or they plan to move it around?
They plan on moving it around. What I don't like about this initial parklet is that it is being initiated on Beechwood rather than other areas of Vanier. Why is the BIA further gentrifying a neighbourhood that doesn't require it? I can think of other areas of Vanier that could use a boost (cough, Montreal road, cough).
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4684  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2016, 3:24 PM
MoreTrains MoreTrains is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Posts: 858
Quote:
Originally Posted by Capital Shaun View Post
Is there room for bikes to go around it or are cyclists getting squeezed into the remaining travel lane? (This stretch of Beechwood — for cycling. I got hit near this spot a few years ago.)
Well, I mean, technically you are supposed to bike in the travel lane... so its not really squeezing you anywhere. Just saying.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4685  
Old Posted Feb 2, 2016, 8:06 PM
monkeybongo monkeybongo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Sep 2012
Posts: 39
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreTrains View Post
Well, I mean, technically you are supposed to bike in the travel lane... so its not really squeezing you anywhere. Just saying.
Technically yes, but tell that to the car drivers. Just saying.

My biggest biking fear, putting my life in the hands of a teenager who is texting their friends while driving and all that separates me from death is about 1 foot of space and 2 seconds of distraction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4686  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2016, 12:19 AM
Buggys Buggys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 659
Sounds like the only appropriate places tonput these parkettes is along stretches with an actual bike lane. That painting of a biker in the middle of a regular lane doesn't add any value of significance.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4687  
Old Posted Feb 3, 2016, 2:25 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
Ottawa 2017 seeks company for multimedia show with 'wow' factor

Matthew Pearson, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: January 29, 2016 | Last Updated: January 29, 2016 1:32 PM EST


Dreamlike, atmospheric projections could be coming to Ottawa in 2017 as part of the city’s plan to mark the 150th anniversary of Canada’s Confederation.

The Ottawa 2017 Bureau is looking to hire a company to produce large-scale multimedia productions, according to a recent posting on the Merx online tendering site.

The not-for-profit organization created to plan and deliver events to mark the sesquicentennial is looking for artistic teams to submit proposals by Feb. 3 for the concept, design, production and implementation of multimedia events at various unnamed locations.

Three shortlisted teams will each be given a bit of money to develop and present their visions using storyboards, 3D renderings or animated videos that demonstrate their “creative talents.” Teams also have to provide technical and operational specifics that demonstrate how they would pull off the production.

The estimated budget for the project is about $3 million, according to the Merx posting, and that’s intended to covers the costs of artistic design and production, equipment purchases, installation, show operation and removal.

What exactly the teams would do hasn’t been completely hammered out just yet. In various locations, they would be tasked with putting on a futuristic and immersive multimedia show using the latest interactive gadgetry, including projections, LED displays, audio and lighting.

The posting includes a link to a YouTube video from a 2011 arts festival in New York City in which images, words and people appear to float across the surface of a bridge as though it’s a giant canvas. Hundreds of people can be seen standing or lying down on the ground to watch the dynamic visual show.

Ottawa 2017 hopes that whatever is ultimately produced has a memorable storyline, reaches a target audience of 500,000 spectators over the course of the year and creates a “WOW factor and buzz that will inspire conversation and encourage visitors to recommend the event and/or return for multiple visits,” the Merx posting says.

Projections on buildings are already part of the Ottawa 2017 plans. The Canadian Videogame Awards will be handed out here in November 2017. In addition to the gala celebrations at the Canada Aviation and Space Museum, there will be a national championship for gamers. Semifinals and final matches will be projected in monumental proportions onto buildings across the city.

The Merx posting says a contract will be awarded in March. Creative concepts are to be completed by the end of August, equipment would be installed next June, after which public shows would begin.

[email protected]
twitter.com/mpearson78

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...pany-for-multimedia-show-with-wow-factor
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4688  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 6:25 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,930
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4689  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2016, 3:06 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
Sparks may fly over proposed new high-voltage line for South Nepean

Tom Spears, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: February 5, 2016 | Last Updated: February 5, 2016 7:09 PM EST




The Crown corporation that wants to build a new high-voltage power line to meet demand in fast-growing South Nepean says it won’t hold public consultations before the line is approved because there’s not enough time — and no alternatives to the project.

The Independent Electricity System Operator (IESO) wants to build a 230-kilovolt transmission line somewhere in the city’s south end, and has told a local advisory committee it needs to get started with approval soon, without any public consultation.

The South Nepean area is in need of a new high-voltage transmission line by 2022 or it will face a “less reliable” electricity supply, says the Crown corporation that runs Ontario’s electricity grid.

It may need a new corridor for at least some of the line. The IESO hasn’t furnished any maps or information about the proposed line’s location, but it would serve the area growing south from Barrhaven and Longfields.

There’s no official cost estimate yet, but one of its advisors suggests it could cost Hydro Ottawa customers about $75 million.

The IESO says it doesn’t plan any public consultation about whether to proceed, “due to the lack of feasible alternatives.” It says it’s too late to reduce south Nepean’s demand.

Consultation would come later, during an environment assessment over which route to take and other details — but not over whether new transmission is a good idea in the first place.

“We’re a long way from the lights flickering,” an IESO spokeswoman said Friday. But she said an increased supply of power is necessary to provide backup when there’s a breakdown somewhere in the system.

South Nepean’s growth has pushed the area’s demand for electricity past the design capacity of its three local distribution substations. But the area has been drawing surplus power from the rest of Ottawa.



Bill Eggertson, a member of the local advisory committee, likens this to running too many extension cords. He says IESO has warned that this makeshift method won’t work as south Nepean demand rises, and other Ottawa neighbourhoods no longer have a surplus to share.

He also argues that Ottawa is at a crossroads. If the city ever plans to get serious about climate change, renewable energy and geothermal power, he says now’s the time to pursue those rather than always looking for more electricity from big generating stations.

The proposal came in a plan tabled with the local advisory committee in January.

“The majority of growth is south of Strandherd (Drive). It’s going to be Nepean’s town centre. It’s a lot of development,” Eggertson said.

“With this new development they are going to be snookered.” And not included in the IESO growth forecast is a potential pumping station for Energy East, he said.

The new high-voltage line would end at a transformer station which sends out smaller lines to neighbourhoods. Eggertson suggests this station might be built at the urban area’s extreme southern edge, reducing the amount of urban development affected by the corridor.

He said his advisory group IESO has asked about a route, but has been told there isn’t one yet. Part of the route could run through existing corridors but “there will be some area that is a new corridor,” he said.

“Somebody is going to be somewhere near a corridor,” he said. For now this affects developers who are planning homes and commercial development in the south end.

“It’s going to upset some people. If we knew where the route was, we’d know who is going to be really upset. But without the houses being built there (today), nobody is upset yet,” he said.

He also says that IESO’s experts told the local group that a similar project recently cost $77 million, and that if this new transmission serves only Ottawa then it would all be charged to Hydro Ottawa customers.

With expected shortages five to six years away, that pushes IESO to the limit of how fast it can get approval and build the lines, he said.

Meanwhile IESO’s documents suggest that the rest of Ottawa will need an even bigger new supply of electricity — another 100 MW in addition to the 60 MW planned now for south Nepean — by 2032. That’s called Phase 2 of the plan.

The IESO says it will brief City of Ottawa staff this month, before finalizing the plans. Then it will hold a “public webinar” for everyone else in the spring. While IESO does the planning at this stage, the work would likely be undertaken by Hydro One and Hydro Ottawa.

Some studies have suggested that living near high-voltage lines raises the risk of cancer. Residents of the Bridlewood neighbourhood of Kanata fought Ontario Hydro’s decision to run a 500-kilovolt power line through their community in the late 1980s.

[email protected]
twitter.com/TomSpears1

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...d-new-high-voltage-line-for-south-nepean
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4690  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2016, 8:56 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,027
For almost 25 years I've lived 300 metres from the lines in briddlewood. Among our cluster of 30 or so homes we've had three people die from brain tumours. There's been cancers too - but I can't tell you how many.

I'm not drawing a connection with the powerlines. I'm just raising my own anecdotal observation. It has not been a reason for me to want to move from here.

However, when I was considering a move to the Metropole (to be closer to work) I was not excited to see that it was built next to a transformer station.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4691  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2016, 9:29 PM
Buggys Buggys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 659
Bill Eggertson: "He also says that IESO’s experts told the local group that a similar project recently cost $77 million, and that if this new transmission serves only Ottawa then it would all be charged to Hydro Ottawa customers."

The rest of Ottawa shouldn't be paying for an expansion that just benefits a small area. It would make more sense to charge the developers building in that area of Barrhaven, vs all HydroOttawa customers.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4692  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 7:08 PM
Boxster's Avatar
Boxster Boxster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 996
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...for-hotel-complex-on-verge-of-demolition

Ottawa Council’s planning committee has already signed off on the demolition and replacement of a Centretown hotel and office complex, but the work could be held up by a new attempt to protect the 40-year-old structures with a heritage designation.

The bid comes from Sarah Jennings, a heritage building advocate, a boutique property developer herself, and the wife of the complex’s designer, Ian Johns. The site is now owned by Morguard Corp., which wants to tear down the defunct hotel and an adjoining low-rise building at Sparks and Bay streets and replace them with a 27-storey modern hotel and a 23-storey condo building.

Johns worked for a company run by prominent land developer Bill Teron. It built the 350 Sparks St. complex to anchor the west end of Sparks Street and add buildings that would be a medium-height transition between taller ones downtown and shorter ones just to the west

The existing buildings are brick, contrary to the fashion in the 1960s and ’70s for concrete, Jennings’ application says, and they’ve held up well compared to other buildings of the era.

“The work was advanced for its time in Ottawa,” the paperwork says, and won an architecture award.

It is, Jennings acknowledges, a “Hail-Mary-and-a-half,” because city council is due on Wednesday to ratify its planning committee’s decision to support a rezoning that would allow the work to proceed. The builder would have to get further approvals before demolishing anything, but the rezoning would be a big step in that direction.

Heritage designations can protect buildings from demolition but the usual idea is to identify and label worthy structures beforehand. Regulators take a dim view of attempts to designate buildings only once someone has a plan to tear them down for some new project. Otherwise a heritage application could become a routine part of any determined attempt to oppose new construction.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4693  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:49 PM
spotlight spotlight is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 100
Quote:
Originally Posted by Boxster View Post
http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...for-hotel-complex-on-verge-of-demolition

Ottawa Council’s planning committee has already signed off on the demolition and replacement of a Centretown hotel and office complex, but the work could be held up by a new attempt to protect the 40-year-old structures with a heritage designation.

The bid comes from Sarah Jennings, a heritage building advocate, a boutique property developer herself, and the wife of the complex’s designer, Ian Johns. The site is now owned by Morguard Corp., which wants to tear down the defunct hotel and an adjoining low-rise building at Sparks and Bay streets and replace them with a 27-storey modern hotel and a 23-storey condo building.

Johns worked for a company run by prominent land developer Bill Teron. It built the 350 Sparks St. complex to anchor the west end of Sparks Street and add buildings that would be a medium-height transition between taller ones downtown and shorter ones just to the west

The existing buildings are brick, contrary to the fashion in the 1960s and ’70s for concrete, Jennings’ application says, and they’ve held up well compared to other buildings of the era.

“The work was advanced for its time in Ottawa,” the paperwork says, and won an architecture award.

It is, Jennings acknowledges, a “Hail-Mary-and-a-half,” because city council is due on Wednesday to ratify its planning committee’s decision to support a rezoning that would allow the work to proceed. The builder would have to get further approvals before demolishing anything, but the rezoning would be a big step in that direction.

Heritage designations can protect buildings from demolition but the usual idea is to identify and label worthy structures beforehand. Regulators take a dim view of attempts to designate buildings only once someone has a plan to tear them down for some new project. Otherwise a heritage application could become a routine part of any determined attempt to oppose new construction.

I'm sorry but are these people for real?


What would ever make this building worthy of heritage status?

Why do (a lot) of people in this city always want to stand in the way of change and growth of this city????

I'm not saying the new buildings are works of art or anything but they're definitely better than what's there now.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4694  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:20 PM
silvergate's Avatar
silvergate silvergate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by spotlight View Post
I'm sorry but are these people for real?


What would ever make this building worthy of heritage status?

Why do (a lot) of people in this city always want to stand in the way of change and growth of this city????

I'm not saying the new buildings are works of art or anything but they're definitely better than what's there now.
It's all laid out there. She a) is the wife of the original designer and b) develops property. Probably hoping that if it can't be re-developed she can swoop in and redevelop it herself.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4695  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 12:41 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,707
National museums underfunded about $78M a year, heritage officials admit

Don Butler, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: February 15, 2016 | Last Updated: February 15, 2016 7:00 PM EST


Canada’s six national museums are underfunded by as much as $78.7 million a year, according to briefing notes prepared by the department for Canadian Heritage minister, Mélanie Joly.

The 16-page document, dated November 2015, outlines the increasingly dire financial position of the national museums.

Four are in the National Capital Region – the Canadian Museum of History, which includes the Canadian War Museum; the Canadian Museum of Nature; the National Gallery of Canada and the Canada Museum of Science and Technology, which includes the aviation and space and agriculture and food museums.

The underfunding, departmental officials say, “puts the proper care of their assets at risk and leads to less effective and efficient program delivery, accelerated deteriorating of artifacts and assets, and, in some cases, health and safety risks.”

They point out that national museums face rising costs of operating, maintaining and repairing their 29 buildings. “These costs far exceed funding, eroding their program budgets and jeopardizing their financial sustainability.”

The museums currently receive $20 million less than they need each year to operate their buildings, the officials say.

Nor do the museums receive enough capital funding to renew exhibits and keep their buildings in optimal condition. The capital funding gap is at least $9.6 million a year and could be as high as $23.7 million. It has resulted in an unfunded accumulated capital backlog of about $120 million, the department says.

If anything, the problem is even more acute when it comes to program funding.

In actual dollars, the museums receive the same amount in program funding today as they did a decade ago, the document says. Thanks to inflation, program budgets have lost 45 per cent of their purchasing power since 1995, representing a further funding gap of $35 million a year.

Altogether, it adds up to an annual shortfall of at least $64.6 million and as much as $78.7 million.



The six museums, whose collections contain more than 12 million artifacts, artistic treasures and scientific materials tracing Canada’s cultural, social and natural history, rely heavily on taxpayers.

In the fiscal year ending March 31, they will collectively receive more than $212 million in parliamentary appropriations.

They earned about $42 million in revenues in 2014-15, but, department officials acknowledge, “these are insufficient to offset the continuously rising costs.”

The museums have “little or no discretion” over the cost of operating their buildings, which consumes 40 per cent of their budgets.

For example, they face rising payments for grants in lieu of taxes to municipalities but receive no extra funding for that, unlike Public Services and Procurement Canada, which receives annual adjustments for the rising costs of the buildings it manages for other departments.

Deferring needed maintenance and repairs for extended periods increases the risk to buildings and collections, the briefing document says, and increases repair and replacement costs.

It cites the grim example of the Canada Science and Technology Museum, which was closed in September 2014 when mould was found after roof repairs were delayed too long. It is now undergoing an $80.5-million refit.

To help offset expenses for building operations and capital needs, the museums have had to cut program spending, heritage officials say, which reduces their ability to renew exhibits and programs.

While national museums have adopted various strategies to cope with the funding shortfall, “results are modest and insufficient to address financial challenges,” the briefing notes state.

That has forced them to turn to “more drastic measures,” including reductions in staff, programs and services to the public, reducing or eliminating subsidies for travelling exhibits and using assets beyond their life cycle “even when replacement is better value for money.”

The department withheld its recommendations to Joly when it made the minister’s briefing books public.

But a spokesman for the minister said she understands that national museums “serve an essential purpose as they keep our collective memory alive.

“Minister Joly has been meeting with senior management of our national museums and she is aware that Canada’s national museums are under financial pressure,” Pierre-Olivier Herbert, Joly’s press attaché, said in an email Monday.

“We plan on pursuing the discussion about the challenges encountered by these institutions as well as evaluating the solutions available to them,” he said, adding that the Liberal government is “working very hard” to ensure that it meets the museums’ infrastructure needs.

Herbert said it was too early to say whether Finance Minister Bill Morneau will address the museums’ needs when he tables his first budget, expected in March.

The six national museums aren’t alone in their struggles. According to another briefing note presented to Joly, 77 per cent of Canada’s 1,500 museums are housed in buildings 35 or more years old, many in need of major repairs and upgrades.

[email protected]
twitter.com/ButlerDon

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news...to-78-9m-a-year-heritage-officials-admit
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4696  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 3:30 AM
mykl mykl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2015
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 475
Sorry if this should go somewhere else (I swear I looked!) but does anyone know anything about what the hell is(n't) happening with Somerset House?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4697  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 1:46 PM
MaxHeadroom's Avatar
MaxHeadroom MaxHeadroom is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Posts: 189
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykl View Post
what the hell is(n't) happening with Somerset House?
http://www.ottawasun.com/2015/06/30/somerset-house-owner-aims-for-2016-finish-but-with-no-duke

Basically a City of Ottawa project being done by a private property owner via coercion.

The hell this property owner has been through is just criminal.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4698  
Old Posted Feb 16, 2016, 5:01 PM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by mykl View Post
Sorry if this should go somewhere else (I swear I looked!) but does anyone know anything about what the hell is(n't) happening with Somerset House?
I was wondering that myself actually. I've driven by it twice over the last month and it doesn't look like any progress has been made at all

The Somerset House thread is here, btw:
http://forum.skyscraperpage.com/showthread.php?t=188153
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4699  
Old Posted Mar 4, 2016, 4:33 PM
Boxster's Avatar
Boxster Boxster is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 996
Very interesting article on real "green" buildings.

http://www.journaldemontreal.com/2016/03/03/une-foret-verticale-en-plein-centre-ville

Also google "bosco verticale" to see the real pics. Pretty wild but great idea.

Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4700  
Old Posted Mar 14, 2016, 8:10 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by kwoldtimer View Post
Diplomatic residences can be located on the Gatineau side, but embassies and High Commissions must be located in the national capital, Ottawa.
Thought of this question recently. This building in Aylmer which just burned down used to house the Saudi embassy... apparently.

http://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/ottawa/suspicious-fire-saudi-arabian-embassy-1.3488538
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:21 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.