Quote:
Originally Posted by OldDartmouthMark
I was commenting on the "seems to have worked...", but regardless.
I agree but will expand your comment to be journalism in general. In fact, I often type it as "journalism" these days.
I've been listening to CBC radio less these days as I have found that they are tending to focus their broadcasts on 3 or 4 topics that they rotate regularly. There are a lot of significant things happening in the world yet they continue to beat their pet topics to death... 
|
For years I was a loyal viewer of local CBC TV news at the dinner hour. I would never watch the Steve Murphy ATV/CTV production, finding it dumbed-down and sensationalist. CBC was the one place you could count on to have some sort of journalistic integrity, albeit with a left bias. But whatever.
That has all changed in the last few years. Now it is CBC that goes for the sensationalist story, beating the drum on certain issues when others rightly ignore it. We saw it last year when they created the Dal Dentistry story pretty much single-handed, and earlier with the Parsons and later the Kidd stories. This year they have been keeping up a steady drumbeat on the Syrian refugee story. Their agenda is not just on the left side of the spectrum, but has become that of the social justice crusaders. I now find myself swallowing hard and watching CTV more often than not. It is a real shame.