HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #7181  
Old Posted Feb 29, 2016, 8:28 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,718
Wow you have a lot of snow there. Though I'm sure less then usual. That construction cam has a high refresh rate.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
     
     
  #7182  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 2:59 AM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Toronto
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by Beedok View Post
The awkard box on the top throws it off for me. (Plus I like real walls...)
I love the tower, the podium/glass is top quality, but sadly the crown became a victim of "The Cheapening". It was supposed to be enveloped with a criss-cross pattern bracing.

I'd post the rendering of the original proposal but it's too depressing.
__________________
Supporter of Bill 23
     
     
  #7183  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 11:38 AM
kool maudit's Avatar
kool maudit kool maudit is offline
video et taceo
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 14,345
The Petersen is a dollar store version of Chicago's Aqua. It is something from a striver city in provincial central Asia. Quelle honte.
     
     
  #7184  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 4:17 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,933
Yeah, Le Peterson is kind of embarrassing, but its awkward location will help it mix in an bit.
     
     
  #7185  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 5:48 PM
someone123's Avatar
someone123 someone123 is offline
hähnchenbrüstfiletstüc
 
Join Date: Nov 2001
Location: Vancouver
Posts: 35,969
6 cranes visible in this shot. From left to right: Alexander, Nova Centre (only one crane now), Pearl (faint in the background), Roy (two cranes), Maple. The parking lot in the foreground will eventually be the Cunard Block site.

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonovision View Post
A little bit of craneporn.

Some other angles:

Quote:
Originally Posted by Jonovision View Post

Source
     
     
  #7186  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 6:47 PM
Darkoshvilli Darkoshvilli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,476
Why is Peterson "embarrassing" exactly? Especially when we don't even what the finish product will look like. That blank wall will never been seen from the main view points anyway.
     
     
  #7187  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 7:09 PM
Rico Rommheim's Avatar
Rico Rommheim Rico Rommheim is offline
Look at me!
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Location: City of Bagels
Posts: 13,933
^Because it's a cheap knock-off of an already-existing design. It's not original, and its execution lacks finesse.
     
     
  #7188  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 7:41 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
from the Quartier des spectacles, Le Peterson will look great.
     
     
  #7189  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 8:09 PM
Darkoshvilli Darkoshvilli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,476
So because Chicago built Aqua nobody can build anything even remotely similar at the risk of being called a knock-off?
     
     
  #7190  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 9:26 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,718
Quote:
Originally Posted by Martin Mtl View Post
/\ They will never see the sun in their condo. There are no other tower iin the city that are so squeeze.

Kind of a funny comment when the picture shows a sun bathed tower.
__________________
"Less is more" – Ludwig Mies van der Rohe
     
     
  #7191  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 9:44 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
Kind of a funny comment when the picture shows a sun bathed tower.
You would probably have found my comment not that funny if you had taken the time to read it in its context. I was responding to a comment made about the lower floors. I have seen the building in person many times and believe me, the lower floors will not see much sun at all.


Source: MtlUrb

Last edited by Martin Mtl; Mar 1, 2016 at 11:13 PM.
     
     
  #7192  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 9:47 PM
Darkoshvilli Darkoshvilli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,476
Only the east side of the tower will be blocked. There's considerable space on all other sides isn't there? Although not much, but enough for some light to come in.
     
     
  #7193  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 9:50 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
Le Peterson, or any other tower built in the same location = same result.
     
     
  #7194  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 10:26 PM
thmx
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Content removed
     
     
  #7195  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 11:09 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkoshvilli View Post
Only the east side of the tower will be blocked. There's considerable space on all other sides isn't there? Although not much, but enough for some light to come in.
This pic was taken on a sunny day.... See how dark it is down there.


Source: Deework on MtlUrb
     
     
  #7196  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 11:11 PM
GreaterMontréal's Avatar
GreaterMontréal GreaterMontréal is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 4,628
Je comprend pas trop l'argument, peu importe la tour construite à cet endroit, il y aurait eu de l'ombrage quand même. Le fait que ce soit Le Paterson ne change absolument rien.
     
     
  #7197  
Old Posted Mar 1, 2016, 11:14 PM
Martin Mtl's Avatar
Martin Mtl Martin Mtl is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 9,074
r
Quote:
Originally Posted by GreaterMontréal View Post
Je comprend pas trop l'argument, peu importe la tour construite à cet endroit, il y aurait eu de l'ombrage quand même. Le fait que ce soit Le Paterson ne change absolument rien.
Personne ne dit le contraire.
     
     
  #7198  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 3:21 AM
Darkoshvilli Darkoshvilli is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2006
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,476
I bet that pic was taken in the evening when the sun was low. Lets see the same pic at noon.
     
     
  #7199  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 8:45 AM
kool maudit's Avatar
kool maudit kool maudit is offline
video et taceo
 
Join Date: Jul 2001
Location: Stockholm
Posts: 14,345
Quote:
Originally Posted by Darkoshvilli View Post
So because Chicago built Aqua nobody can build anything even remotely similar at the risk of being called a knock-off?
It is not a similar design, or an interesting elaboration on the design theme seen in Aqua. It's an epigone.

It's also, as noted, a filler building on a weird street that's basically an alley, so it's no huge setback. But let's be real.
     
     
  #7200  
Old Posted Mar 2, 2016, 11:49 PM
SkahHigh's Avatar
SkahHigh SkahHigh is offline
More transit please
 
Join Date: Jul 2013
Location: Montreal
Posts: 3,794
A few projects from my visit in TO



Picasso



Tableau



Don't know which these are



L Tower with it's famous crane

     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:38 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.