Quote:
Originally Posted by Ant131531
I'm of the opinion that all new buildings in the Midtown submarket should at least have one retail streetfront. At least, especially for the projected densities that Midtown will eventually have.
|
Midtown Alliance has worked to establish "storefront corridors" in Midtown that include 17th, 14th, 10th, 5th, North, Peachtree, Crescent, and a handful of others that fit the need for retail at the street.
But the requirements for all buildings to have one retail streetfront isn't feasible and warranted. Perhaps "active use" is what you meant in lieu of retail streetfront? - which is already codified by the SPI 16 and 17 Development Design Guidelines.
That being said it's unfortunate they didn't address the Medical Office Building prototypes in the zoning long before a project like this was coming along because it's probably overparked to some extent. The argument is that most of the sick/ill patients going to a medical office building probably shouldn't be riding transit regardless. The introduction of a valet service could help to curtail parking problems in a more dense area but evena recent MOB in an urban Seattle neighborhood have significantly large parking decks that were necessary just because of the building use.
It's unfortunate that for most projects in this city underground parking is too cost-prohibitive because of the shallow bedrock in most areas.
Slightly dated guidelines here:
http://www.midtownatl.com/_files/docs/development_guide1.pdf