HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4841  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 8:55 PM
esquire's Avatar
esquire esquire is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2001
Posts: 37,480
So is CalgaryNEXT dead, or just retooling, or what? The silence is deafening on that one.
     
     
  #4842  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 9:38 PM
tomthumb2's Avatar
tomthumb2 tomthumb2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
So is CalgaryNEXT dead, or just retooling, or what? The silence is deafening on that one.
At the pace Ken King works, it'll probably be another ten years before we hear anything. Or in other words - it's dead, lol. Doesn't seem to be any public appetite for it anyway, given the terrible initial proposal and current economy/job situation.
     
     
  #4843  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 9:41 PM
The Fisher Account's Avatar
The Fisher Account The Fisher Account is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bridgeland - Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,023
Um, can we just wait for the West Village environmental report findings in April first, before we dismiss this project as 'dead'?
__________________
Follow me on Twitter - @Fisher_Account for Calgary construction and development updates
     
     
  #4844  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 9:48 PM
VIce VIce is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2013
Posts: 704
Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire View Post
So is CalgaryNEXT dead, or just retooling, or what? The silence is deafening on that one.
Every time they delayed the expectations got higher. And then what they showed was disappointing even to people who weren't following things. It might be good to keep a low profile until they have something of substance.
     
     
  #4845  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 9:49 PM
tomthumb2's Avatar
tomthumb2 tomthumb2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by The Fisher Account View Post
Um, can we just wait for the West Village environmental report findings in April first, before we dismiss this project as 'dead'?
Sure, but I wonder if that will really change anything? (unless it comes back unbelievably good)
     
     
  #4846  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 9:50 PM
tomthumb2's Avatar
tomthumb2 tomthumb2 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Location: Calgary
Posts: 682
Quote:
Originally Posted by VIce View Post
Every time they delayed the expectations got higher. And then what they showed was disappointing even to people who weren't following things. It might be good to keep a low profile until they have something of substance.
Yeah they're probably a little gun shy after all the lambasting they've taken!
     
     
  #4847  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 10:18 PM
The Fisher Account's Avatar
The Fisher Account The Fisher Account is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bridgeland - Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by tomthumb2 View Post
Sure, but I wonder if that will really change anything? (unless it comes back unbelievably good)
It's going to give a good indication on LOE to get the area re-mediated. That's the first step in this whole process and what city council is waiting on. It's a huge piece of the pie.

This project will not go away. It will be debated, modified, re-imagined, etc.. but ultimately, it will get built at some point.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter - @Fisher_Account for Calgary construction and development updates
     
     
  #4848  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 12:06 AM
EpicPonyTime's Avatar
EpicPonyTime EpicPonyTime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yellowfork
Posts: 1,168
Something may get built on that land eventually, but it won't be CalgaryNEXT. That proposal was dead on arrival. Especially with the developments being built in other cities, what will be built is going to be completely unrecognizable, which unforunately will probably mean ditching the stadium in favour of a public square and bars and other amenities.
     
     
  #4849  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 1:59 AM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,145
The latest episode of Billions had one of the lead guys fly to Quebec City for a Metallica concert, and they showed an exterior shot of the arena and then filmed a scene inside on the floor (during concert set-up)... and parts of the actual concert.

Last edited by Berklon; Feb 9, 2016 at 2:11 AM.
     
     
  #4850  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:42 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
Quote:
Originally Posted by Berklon View Post
The latest episode of Billions had one of the lead guys fly to Quebec City for a Metallica concert, and they showed an exterior shot of the arena and then filmed a scene inside on the floor (during concert set-up)... and parts of the actual concert.
k?
__________________
I don't want to hear your opinions on facts
     
     
  #4851  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:49 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
CalgaryNext will eventually transform to a New Arena in a different location and a renovated McMahon stadium. I don't see the city building the stamps a new stadium dressed up as a field house, who is falling for this?. Not as long as Nenshi is still involved and even then that new arena is 10 years away. I'm almost sure the sens will be settled in a new arena before Calgary even breaks ground on one. Rogers place and the New flames rink will likley share the same age difference Rex and the dome currently do. IMO the New Arena in Calgary is right on track (the dome hasn't even hit 34 yet, rexall is 44) and I'm sure the flames group expected this delay. It's the stamps who are gonna suffer until the "next" project is dropped and money is raised for a reno to the stadium
__________________
I don't want to hear your opinions on facts
     
     
  #4852  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:09 AM
Berklon's Avatar
Berklon Berklon is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 3,145
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
k?
Just thought it was neat how the arena was featured and they weren't trying to pretend it was a different arena/city. Beats showing a picture of Edmonton's arena only 3 days after the last picture was taken/shown.
     
     
  #4853  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 6:00 AM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
BMO is pulling out of TFC as the major sponsor. I wonder what this means for the BMO field naming rights? A fresh start wouldn't be a bad thing at all. Try and shed as much MLS stigma as possible from Toronto's new CFL venue (that can also be converted to house a soccer team)
__________________
I don't want to hear your opinions on facts
     
     
  #4854  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 8:50 AM
EpicPonyTime's Avatar
EpicPonyTime EpicPonyTime is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Yellowfork
Posts: 1,168
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
BMO is pulling out of TFC as the major sponsor. I wonder what this means for the BMO field naming rights? A fresh start wouldn't be a bad thing at all. Try and shed as much MLS stigma as possible from Toronto's new CFL venue (that can also be converted to house a soccer team)
Ten bucks we get Rogers Field.
     
     
  #4855  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 11:38 AM
osmo osmo is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 1,717
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
BMO is pulling out of TFC as the major sponsor. I wonder what this means for the BMO field naming rights? A fresh start wouldn't be a bad thing at all. Try and shed as much MLS stigma as possible from Toronto's new CFL venue (that can also be converted to house a soccer team)
BMO pulled out last year way before the Argos deal was finalized. MLSE did not announce it as they could still push shirt sales and they did not have a new sponsor signed in time, it was supposed to be changed for last season.

The rumors are it will be KIA. It is mused that a car company is taking over it would make sense it is KIA.

Also the stadium stays the same. BMO is pulling out as the kit sponsor but not for the stadium.
     
     
  #4856  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:07 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 41,029
Quote:
Originally Posted by osmo View Post
The rumors are it will be KIA. It is mused that a car company is taking over it would make sense it is KIA.
Good name for a stadium featuring the Argonauts.

KIA = killed in action.......
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
     
     
  #4857  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 3:27 PM
FrankieFlowerpot's Avatar
FrankieFlowerpot FrankieFlowerpot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2012
Posts: 3,478
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
BMO is pulling out of TFC as the major sponsor. I wonder what this means for the BMO field naming rights? A fresh start wouldn't be a bad thing at all. Try and shed as much MLS stigma as possible from Toronto's new CFL venue (that can also be converted to house a soccer team)
You didn't last too long in your second stint on the RPB forum did you?
     
     
  #4858  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:03 PM
mistercorporate's Avatar
mistercorporate mistercorporate is offline
The Fruit of Discipline
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,036
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrankieFlowerpot View Post
You didn't last too long in your second stint on the RPB forum did you?
That was him? I assumed it was Esquire due to the Winnipeg bombers references.
__________________
MLS: Toronto FC
Canadian Premier League: York 9 FC
NBA: Raptors
     
     
  #4859  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:42 PM
Oilkountry's Avatar
Oilkountry Oilkountry is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2014
Posts: 1,868
I thought i was pretty polite haha. And honestly most of the guys over there are first class. Just a few MR Corporate's convinced that the Argos are terminal ill spouting off about senseless nothing's. "TFC is worth this much and the Argos are worth this much therefor the CFL is dead" basic TFC logic.
__________________
I don't want to hear your opinions on facts
     
     
  #4860  
Old Posted Feb 9, 2016, 5:45 PM
The Fisher Account's Avatar
The Fisher Account The Fisher Account is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Bridgeland - Calgary, AB
Posts: 1,023
Quote:
Originally Posted by Oilkountry View Post
CalgaryNext will eventually transform to a New Arena in a different location and a renovated McMahon stadium. I don't see the city building the stamps a new stadium dressed up as a field house, who is falling for this?. Not as long as Nenshi is still involved and even then that new arena is 10 years away. I'm almost sure the sens will be settled in a new arena before Calgary even breaks ground on one. Rogers place and the New flames rink will likley share the same age difference Rex and the dome currently do. IMO the New Arena in Calgary is right on track (the dome hasn't even hit 34 yet, rexall is 44) and I'm sure the flames group expected this delay. It's the stamps who are gonna suffer until the "next" project is dropped and money is raised for a reno to the stadium
I really don't think you have a solid understanding or adequate pulse on the situation in Calgary.
__________________
Follow me on Twitter - @Fisher_Account for Calgary construction and development updates
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:56 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.