HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4741  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 4:01 PM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: Province 2, Canadian Empire
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe View Post
Before the extension, Highway 407 ended with no freeway link to the 401. Building this extension makes sense. Even if this is the furthest it goes, it gets people back on to the 401 without going through slow areas.

Extending the 417 is needed, but, really, the GTA has some serious congestion.

The 407 is supposed to stay in Ontario government hands.
I suppose they wanted to address some local traffic issues with the 412 and 418 (killing three birds with one stone) but I find it odd that the link-up from the 401 to the 407 wasn't just done with an east-west route (407 extension) that would have run naturally northwestwards from a new 401-407 junction in the vicinity of Bowmanville-Clarington.

Instead of two totally perpendicular routes that make you go north-south when your journey is actually east-west.
__________________
Loin des yeux, loin du coeur.
     
     
  #4742  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 4:18 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreTrains View Post
The 407 extension is such a waste. Im assuming they are expanding the fare paid area. And also assuming that the ownership will be handed over to the 407ETR gang who are supposed to toll and maintain it. How much usage does the 407 see daily anyways?
I think the money would have been better spent further north in say, Renfrew County extending the 417.

As for the 401 extension in Windsor, it seems to be an innovative approach to keeping communities together. Too bad they didnt think about that when they built every highway through Ottawa / Toronto.
I feel like the community barrier ideology is such a buzz thing right now.

A lot of things can be barriers to communities, and all communities have barriers or some sort irrespective if they have a highway or not.

Railways can be barriers, utilities corridors can be barriers, rivers can be barriers, and yes highways can be barriers.

The biggest argument about highways being barriers stems from when they were cut through pre-existing urban neighbourhoods in instances where formerly no barrier previously existed. Highway construction happened like this in Quebec, but by in large (there are exceptions) didn't in Ontario.

For example, The Gardiner is built adjacent to the railway line, which has always been a community barrier. The 417 through Ottawa was built on a former railway right-of-way, which itself had always been a barrier. Other Toronto area highways such as the 401 and 427 were built on predominantly greenfield alignments, or displaced rural dwellings that were never community oriented anyways. So they never established a new barrier that wasn't already there anyways.

The 401 in extension in Windsor is awesome, but in my opinion its design doesn't really have anything to do with not creating an urban barrier. The new highway replaced Hwy 3, which was previously lined with predominantly rural dwellings that were never community focused anyways.
     
     
  #4743  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 5:50 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,831
The 407 extension is largely self financing from my understanding. Capital costs will be recouped from tolls.

Renfrew is probably going to get its money soon anyway.. There has been a big push for further extensions of the 417 and the province and Feds have been looking for places to drop a lot of infrastructure cash..
     
     
  #4744  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 6:42 PM
hipster duck's Avatar
hipster duck hipster duck is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2014
Location: Toronto
Posts: 4,853
Quote:
Originally Posted by sonysnob View Post
I feel like the community barrier ideology is such a buzz thing right now.

A lot of things can be barriers to communities, and all communities have barriers or some sort irrespective if they have a highway or not.

Railways can be barriers, utilities corridors can be barriers, rivers can be barriers, and yes highways can be barriers.

The biggest argument about highways being barriers stems from when they were cut through pre-existing urban neighbourhoods in instances where formerly no barrier previously existed. Highway construction happened like this in Quebec, but by in large (there are exceptions) didn't in Ontario.

For example, The Gardiner is built adjacent to the railway line, which has always been a community barrier. The 417 through Ottawa was built on a former railway right-of-way, which itself had always been a barrier. Other Toronto area highways such as the 401 and 427 were built on predominantly greenfield alignments, or displaced rural dwellings that were never community oriented anyways. So they never established a new barrier that wasn't already there anyways.

The 401 in extension in Windsor is awesome, but in my opinion its design doesn't really have anything to do with not creating an urban barrier. The new highway replaced Hwy 3, which was previously lined with predominantly rural dwellings that were never community focused anyways.
Agreed. The "barrier" argument is especially a red herring when the area being "split" is an automobile-oriented one and there is no pedestrian contact between the areas supposedly being bisected.

A typical subdivision, for example, is an enclosed unit, and there is very little reason for people to venture across the arterial road or the hydro corridor to the subdivision on the other side, whether by foot or by car. If the right of way is large enough to accommodate a freeway, there's even less likelihood that people on one side had any psychological connection to the people on the other prior to the freeway being built.

Like a lot of things, the "barrier" argument is a hangover from the bad old days of the 1950s when homes and businesses in densely packed urban neighbourhoods were expropriated and pulled down so urban expressways could be smashed through.
     
     
  #4745  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 7:34 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
The 407 extension is largely self financing from my understanding. Capital costs will be recouped from tolls.

Renfrew is probably going to get its money soon anyway.. There has been a big push for further extensions of the 417 and the province and Feds have been looking for places to drop a lot of infrastructure cash..
I'm pretty sure the whole section from Arnprior up to Renfrew is shovel ready (the first quarter of it is U/C now) so it can be built as soon as money flows.
__________________
"It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves." - Friedrich Hayek
     
     
  #4746  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 7:36 PM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by MoreTrains View Post
The 407 extension is such a waste. Im assuming they are expanding the fare paid area. And also assuming that the ownership will be handed over to the 407ETR gang who are supposed to toll and maintain it. How much usage does the 407 see daily anyways?
I think the money would have been better spent further north in say, Renfrew County extending the 417.

As for the 401 extension in Windsor, it seems to be an innovative approach to keeping communities together. Too bad they didnt think about that when they built every highway through Ottawa / Toronto.
Ownership of the 407 extension will be in the hands of the province. 407ETR is contracted to run the billing so that it's an integrated billing system and customers only get one bill, but the money from the provincially-owned section will go the province and the province sets its own toll rates on it.

I believe the province is expected to make $150M a year off Phase 1 (heard that number somewhere, I think someone said so on UT). If that's true, it will repay its construction cost fully in about 7 years.
__________________
"It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves." - Friedrich Hayek
     
     
  #4747  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 8:17 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by 1overcosc View Post
I'm pretty sure the whole section from Arnprior up to Renfrew is shovel ready (the first quarter of it is U/C now) so it can be built as soon as money flows.
I was through Renfrew late in the fall, and at the time that I drove through I saw a survey crew out at the intersection between Highway 17 and Highway 60. It might not be related to future highway construction, but on the other hand it could be. That said, even if the surveying was for an eventual extension of Hwy 417, surveying today would likely mean they won't be ready to build anything for at least a few years.
     
     
  #4748  
Old Posted Feb 4, 2016, 9:06 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 12,831
Yea construction would probably have to wait a year or two to update the EA and do final design, just like any highway project. I could see it starting construction 2018 and finishing 2021 or so.
     
     
  #4749  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2016, 4:29 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,797
Quote:
Originally Posted by Innsertnamehere View Post
Yea construction would probably have to wait a year or two to update the EA and do final design, just like any highway project. I could see it starting construction 2018 and finishing 2021 or so.
I can't see construction being done that quickly to be honest. It wouldn't surprise me if by 2021 they were as far as Calabogie Road or so, but I can't see them making it all the way to Renfrew by then.
     
     
  #4750  
Old Posted Feb 5, 2016, 10:57 PM
manny_santos's Avatar
manny_santos manny_santos is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2006
Location: New Westminster
Posts: 5,141
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack View Post
I suppose they wanted to address some local traffic issues with the 412 and 418 (killing three birds with one stone) but I find it odd that the link-up from the 401 to the 407 wasn't just done with an east-west route (407 extension) that would have run naturally northwestwards from a new 401-407 junction in the vicinity of Bowmanville-Clarington.

Instead of two totally perpendicular routes that make you go north-south when your journey is actually east-west.
The plans I've seen from almost 40 years ago seemed to suggest the 407 was to be built to Peterborough, using the 115 right of way. Plans back then included only one freeway link from the 407 to the 401, and it was on the east side of Metro Toronto (or possibly in Pickering).

Based on traffic studies I've seen from the 60s, I suspect the logic of building the 407 towards Peterborough may have been related to facilitating traffic between not only Toronto and Peterborough, but also between Toronto and Ottawa, as well as the cottage areas around the Kawarthas. The 1970s plan, incidentally, did not include a freeway link between Ottawa and Highway 401, but did show a two-lane diversion of Highway 16 up to the 417 roughly where the 416 now is.

Additionally I think the 407 alignment that was chosen will help siphon some traffic off the 401 that currently exits at 35/115. Anyone who has been on the 401 in Durham on a Friday summer afternoon knows how congested that gets right now.
     
     
  #4751  
Old Posted Feb 6, 2016, 12:49 AM
1overcosc's Avatar
1overcosc 1overcosc is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2013
Location: Eastern Ontario
Posts: 12,377
Quote:
Originally Posted by manny_santos View Post
The plans I've seen from almost 40 years ago seemed to suggest the 407 was to be built to Peterborough, using the 115 right of way. Plans back then included only one freeway link from the 407 to the 401, and it was on the east side of Metro Toronto (or possibly in Pickering).

Based on traffic studies I've seen from the 60s, I suspect the logic of building the 407 towards Peterborough may have been related to facilitating traffic between not only Toronto and Peterborough, but also between Toronto and Ottawa, as well as the cottage areas around the Kawarthas. The 1970s plan, incidentally, did not include a freeway link between Ottawa and Highway 401, but did show a two-lane diversion of Highway 16 up to the 417 roughly where the 416 now is.

Additionally I think the 407 alignment that was chosen will help siphon some traffic off the 401 that currently exits at 35/115. Anyone who has been on the 401 in Durham on a Friday summer afternoon knows how congested that gets right now.
Highway 416 south of Ottawa was actually constructed in the 1970s as a super-two, and was called "Highway 16 new" (replacing the old Highway 16 route which was downloaded), and was then twinned in the 1990s.

The original, pre-1970s route of Highway 16 is now Leeds-Grenville County Road 44 between the 401 and Rideau River, Ottawa Road 5 between Rideau River and North Gower, and Prince of Wales Drive between North Gower and Ottawa. It was this route that was initially bypassed as a super two and then became a freeway later.
__________________
"It is only because the control of the means of production is divided among many people acting independently that nobody has complete power over us, that we as individuals can decide what to do with ourselves." - Friedrich Hayek
     
     
  #4752  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 2:50 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
I finally downloaded the final version of my Confederation Bridge video. I am talking about the construction of the bridge at the beginning following by a footage of the Bridge itself. Enjoy !

Video Link
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #4753  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 3:45 PM
MonctonRad's Avatar
MonctonRad MonctonRad is online now
Wildcats Rule!!
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Moncton NB
Posts: 40,958


Very nice Franks, I may repost this on the Atlantic Canada Highways thread.

The Confederation Bridge is truly an engineering marvel which I think is under-appreciated in the rest of Canada.

At 14 km, it is the longest bridge in the country and has truly revolutionized access to the island province. Being from the Island originally, I can well remember 4-6 hour waits at the ferry terminal to get to and from the mainland in the summertime. You quickly learned what the best times of the day were in order to ensure undelayed passage on the ferry. If you were going to the mainland, you had to build extra time into your schedule just in case you missed the ferry. In the winter time, ferries would occasionally get stuck in sea ice, and it was not unheard of for "Canada to be cut off from PEI" for a couple of days at a time.

Suddenly, in 1997, Islanders had unimpeded access to the mainland! Tourism to PEI took a spike and was up by at least 25-30% as day tripping from Moncton became easy (with predictable travel times). Similarly, Islanders would cross without much thought to go shopping in the larger centres of Moncton and Halifax. There was free flow of goods, and PEI became fully integrated into the continental supply line. Prices on goods decreased a little.

The bridge was revolutionary. I often wonder if the success of the bridge could be replicated on the other side of the continent with a fixed link between Vancouver Island and the mainland. I wonder if this is even possible? How deep is the Strait of Juan de Fuca???
__________________
Go 'Cats Go
     
     
  #4754  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 11:02 PM
Taeolas Taeolas is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2009
Location: Fredericton
Posts: 5,021
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrAnKs View Post
I finally downloaded the final version of my Confederation Bridge video. I am talking about the construction of the bridge at the beginning following by a footage of the Bridge itself. Enjoy !
Nice video; but one correction. Your images of the "PEI has some stunning Maritime landscapes" shows the Hopewell Cape flowerpot rocks, which are in NB, not PEI.
     
     
  #4755  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 11:53 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by Taeolas View Post
Nice video; but one correction. Your images of the "PEI has some stunning Maritime landscapes" shows the Hopewell Cape flowerpot rocks, which are in NB, not PEI.
LOL I know I noticed that mistake ! ... don't ask me why, but when I typed ''P.E.I. Landscapes'' on Google I got this picture ! ... and as I'm not from there I didn't noticed that it was wrong
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000
     
     
  #4756  
Old Posted Feb 7, 2016, 11:56 PM
FrAnKs's Avatar
FrAnKs FrAnKs is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2005
Location: Ville de Québec / Quebec city
Posts: 5,930
Quote:
Originally Posted by MonctonRad View Post


Very nice Franks, I may repost this on the Atlantic Canada Highways thread.

The Confederation Bridge is truly an engineering marvel which I think is under-appreciated in the rest of Canada.

At 14 km, it is the longest bridge in the country and has truly revolutionized access to the island province. Being from the Island originally, I can well remember 4-6 hour waits at the ferry terminal to get to and from the mainland in the summertime. You quickly learned what the best times of the day were in order to ensure undelayed passage on the ferry. If you were going to the mainland, you had to build extra time into your schedule just in case you missed the ferry. In the winter time, ferries would occasionally get stuck in sea ice, and it was not unheard of for "Canada to be cut off from PEI" for a couple of days at a time.

Suddenly, in 1997, Islanders had unimpeded access to the mainland! Tourism to PEI took a spike and was up by at least 25-30% as day tripping from Moncton became easy (with predictable travel times). Similarly, Islanders would cross without much thought to go shopping in the larger centres of Moncton and Halifax. There was free flow of goods, and PEI became fully integrated into the continental supply line. Prices on goods decreased a little.

The bridge was revolutionary. I often wonder if the success of the bridge could be replicated on the other side of the continent with a fixed link between Vancouver Island and the mainland. I wonder if this is even possible? How deep is the Strait of Juan de Fuca???
Thank you ! I didn't knew you was from P.E.I. ... are you from Charlottetown ?
But even if it got easier to visit P.E.I, it will still remain an Island and keep that specific and unique personality
And thank you for the interresting facts!
__________________
PROVINCE OF QUEBEC ==> 9 050 000
MONTREAL METRO ==> 4 600 000
QUEBEC CITY METRO ==> 900 000

Last edited by FrAnKs; Feb 8, 2016 at 12:21 AM.
     
     
  #4757  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 5:58 AM
ssiguy ssiguy is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: White Rock BC
Posts: 11,903
Great work Frank!
     
     
  #4758  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 6:19 AM
Kokkei Mizu's Avatar
Kokkei Mizu Kokkei Mizu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 447
This may be a stretch, but you can see sections of Hwy 63 at the beginning and end of this video... So it belongs here, right?

Video Link
     
     
  #4759  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 6:46 AM
craner's Avatar
craner craner is offline
Go Tall or Go Home
 
Join Date: Mar 2007
Location: Calgary
Posts: 7,372
Awesome video of the Confederation Bridge Franks, just awesome.
Bravo!

Edit: Also enjoyed your FM video Kokkei.
     
     
  #4760  
Old Posted Feb 8, 2016, 7:09 AM
RueBulmer RueBulmer is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2015
Location: Montreal
Posts: 254
Quote:
Originally Posted by FrAnKs View Post
I finally downloaded the final version of my Confederation Bridge video. I am talking about the construction of the bridge at the beginning following by a footage of the Bridge itself. Enjoy !

Video Link
Love your videos. Thank you.
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 11:50 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.