HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #2461  
Old Posted Jan 7, 2016, 8:22 PM
Riise's Avatar
Riise Riise is offline
City Maker
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Location: Calgary | London
Posts: 3,195
Quote:
Originally Posted by lubicon View Post
Unfortunately that is true. It was much better before when prices did not include taxes and fees - it gave you a much better picture of how much you were getting bent over by the government, airports, etc.
I think most people are interested in what they will have to pay at the point of sale and would rather be provided with that information. The various fees and taxes are details and could be sought after in a detailed invoice.
__________________
“Such suburban models are being rationalized as ‘what people want,’ when in fact they are simply what is most expedient to produce. The truth is that what people want is a decent place to live, not just a suburban version of a decent place to live.”
- Roberta Brandes Gratz
     
     
  #2462  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2016, 2:22 AM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
Quote:
Originally Posted by Riise View Post
I think most people are interested in what they will have to pay at the point of sale and would rather be provided with that information. The various fees and taxes are details and could be sought after in a detailed invoice.
I totally agree. I want to know the price I am going to pay. I can look through the taxes on the receipt if I need to know how much is going to the government.
     
     
  #2463  
Old Posted Jan 8, 2016, 2:27 AM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,914
[QUOTE=lubicon;7291356]
Quote:
Originally Posted by Klazu View Post
What impresses me is that their prices actually include all taxes and fees.

QUOTE]



Unfortunately that is true. It was much better before when prices did not include taxes and fees - it gave you a much better picture of how much you were getting bent over by the government, airports, etc.
I think the problem with the old system was many of the taxes were not taxes. fuel charges are not taxes. Airport fees are not taxes.
     
     
  #2464  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2016, 4:25 AM
DrNest's Avatar
DrNest DrNest is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2012
Location: Toronto
Posts: 2,119
The refugee flights are bringing more rarely seen foreign tails into CYYZ. We had a Royal Jordanian A332 and a Hi Fly A333 come in today.
     
     
  #2465  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2016, 4:15 PM
craneSpotter's Avatar
craneSpotter craneSpotter is offline
is watching.
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Location: Greater Victoria
Posts: 3,083
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkahHigh View Post
Hopefully they'll expand in the future. I feel like secondary markets such as YQB and YQM are being left out...
The new 'Director of Airport Services' for Newleaf will be responsible for managing outstations in Ottawa (YOW), Victoria (YYJ) and US destinations - in addition to Regina/Saskatoon.

https://www.clearslide.com/view/mail?iID=FG5FXH5S4JWTTCZN7TW8

So I guess if bookings are strong this winter/spring, next round of expansion should be YOW and YYJ with possibly a US destination or two from YWG, YHM and/or YLW (as those appear to be their 'hubs').

I can see YYJ-YWG.
__________________
"compound interest is the 8th wonder of the world.."

Last edited by craneSpotter; Jan 9, 2016 at 4:31 PM.
     
     
  #2466  
Old Posted Jan 9, 2016, 7:45 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
I hope NewLeaf does well; however, it would still take a lot on their part to stop the transborder bleeding though. U.S. airports don't have nearly as many extra surcharges that Canadian airports have. Vancouver, Calgary, Regina, Winnipeg, Winsor, London, Hamilton, Toronto, Montreal are particularly affected. We'll see.
     
     
  #2467  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 2:12 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
I hope NewLeaf does well; however, it would still take a lot on their part to stop the transborder bleeding though.
The dollar is doing that quite nicely on its own.
     
     
  #2468  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 2:44 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
U.S. airports don't have nearly as many extra surcharges that Canadian airports have.
Really? You probably never look at the fare detail very closely then.

This is the fare breakdown for an one-way YVR-LAX trip with AC:



So in short, what each party gets:

$57.00 Air Canada
$20.00 Vancouver Airport
$16.56 Canadian Government
$48.31 US Government

The US government charge almost as much as Air Canada that actually does all the work to take you there! I always wonder who actually makes more profit for the trip - the airline, airport, or the government... So the reason why trans-boarder flights are so expensive is that we have to pay tax to both governments AND the fact that the US government charge us more.

Do you know, if you are a US resident and book the exact same flight from the same airline and same website, the flight will come out to be about $16 cheaper because US government only tax them $32.50 instead of $48?

Yeah, so much about the lie that travel to US is so expensive from Canada because the Canadian government tax too much....
     
     
  #2469  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 3:26 AM
eemy's Avatar
eemy eemy is offline
Closed account
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 4,425
What are the fees on the reverse flight, though? I imagine that a lot of those US gov't fees only apply when entering the country and that there would be equivalent fees for Canada customs and immigration.
     
     
  #2470  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 5:35 AM
nname nname is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 5,097
Quote:
Originally Posted by jeremy_haak View Post
What are the fees on the reverse flight, though? I imagine that a lot of those US gov't fees only apply when entering the country and that there would be equivalent fees for Canada customs and immigration.
One-way trip LAX-YVR as a Canadian resident:



$80.00 Air Canada
$6.35 Los Angeles Airport
$33.00 US Government

Again, if the flight is booked for a US resident, they pay $13 to the government instead of $33. Canadian side did not even take a penny from it.
     
     
  #2471  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 5:51 AM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
The problem on the Canadian side are the built in costs to airports in terms of federal rent. If that were to disappear, I wouldn't have a complaint.
     
     
  #2472  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 2:10 PM
SkydivePilot SkydivePilot is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Location: REGINA
Posts: 2,295
Quote:
Originally Posted by nname View Post
Really? You probably never look at the fare detail very closely then.

This is the fare breakdown for an one-way YVR-LAX trip with AC:



So in short, what each party gets:

$57.00 Air Canada
$20.00 Vancouver Airport
$16.56 Canadian Government
$48.31 US Government

The US government charge almost as much as Air Canada that actually does all the work to take you there! I always wonder who actually makes more profit for the trip - the airline, airport, or the government... So the reason why trans-boarder flights are so expensive is that we have to pay tax to both governments AND the fact that the US government charge us more.

Do you know, if you are a US resident and book the exact same flight from the same airline and same website, the flight will come out to be about $16 cheaper because US government only tax them $32.50 instead of $48?

Yeah, so much about the lie that travel to US is so expensive from Canada because the Canadian government tax too much....
Well, in recent years, Bellingham, WA has been quite busy for a number of years serving the Lower Mainland. Besides that, unlike Vancouver, Regina has shit all these days to U.S. destinations (with higher fares) and has significant passenger bleeding to Minot ND. (Allegiant)
     
     
  #2473  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 3:09 PM
Denscity Denscity is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2008
Location: Laramidia
Posts: 12,782
Bellinghams airport has been tanking lately for pax.
__________________
Peak SSP:

28C is hotter than 42C
Vancouver is not on the ocean but Quebec City is.
     
     
  #2474  
Old Posted Jan 10, 2016, 5:11 PM
jmt18325's Avatar
jmt18325 jmt18325 is offline
Heart of the Continent
 
Join Date: Apr 2009
Location: Winnipeg
Posts: 7,286
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
Well, in recent years, Bellingham, WA has been quite busy for a number of years serving the Lower Mainland.
If you don't fly in, you don't pay a lot of those taxes.
     
     
  #2475  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 2:19 PM
Coldrsx's Avatar
Coldrsx Coldrsx is online now
Community Guy
 
Join Date: Dec 2003
Location: Edmonton, AB
Posts: 69,109
Bombardier’s C Series jet an ‘orphan,’ Airbus says

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on...-c-series-jet-an-orphan/article28133795/
__________________
"The destructive effects of automobiles are much less a cause than a symptom of our incompetence at city building" - Jane Jacobs 1961ish

Wake me up when I can see skyscrapers
     
     
  #2476  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 4:24 PM
thenoflyzone thenoflyzone is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2015
Location: Montreal, Quebec
Posts: 4,322
Quote:
Originally Posted by Coldrsx View Post
Bombardier’s C Series jet an ‘orphan,’ Airbus says

http://www.theglobeandmail.com/report-on...-c-series-jet-an-orphan/article28133795/
Bunch of bull...After all, it's not like Leahy is going to praise the CSeries at their annual press conference.

"His description of the C Series as an “orphan,” he said, referred to its small-family status; so far, it will come in only two versions – the CS100 and the larger CS300 – that will seat about 100 to 150 passengers. “It’s a one-off, it’s not a real family,” he said. “With Boeing or Airbus, you get different variants. You get the Airbus 318, 319, 320, 321 and you get a product support network around the world."


yeah, because the A318 and A319neo are selling like hot cakes....As far as I am concerned, the A318 is and always was dead, and so is the A319, with only 50 orders for the A319neo. Wouldn't be surprised if they cancel the A319neo and convert all the orders to the A320neo.

The CSeries has 2 variants, and as far as I'm concerned, so does the A320 !

Furthermore, the fact that Airbus and Bombardier met to discuss a potential (full or partial) buy-out of the CSeries clearly demonstrates the threat the CSeries represents to Airbus. There is no denying that fact.
     
     
  #2477  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 4:55 PM
Bigtime's Avatar
Bigtime Bigtime is offline
Very tall. Such Scrape.
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 17,727
I'm really hoping since the CSeries is truly a new plane (versus the 737MAX and A320NEO) it will deliver some impressive performance numbers when it enters service and that leads to more orders from other operators.

Oh and LOL at Leahy even mentioning the A318, even Boeing smartened up and ditched the 736.
     
     
  #2478  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 10:50 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by thenoflyzone View Post
Bunch of bull...After all, it's not like Leahy is going to praise the CSeries at their annual press conference.

"His description of the C Series as an “orphan,” he said, referred to its small-family status; so far, it will come in only two versions – the CS100 and the larger CS300 – that will seat about 100 to 150 passengers. “It’s a one-off, it’s not a real family,” he said. “With Boeing or Airbus, you get different variants. You get the Airbus 318, 319, 320, 321 and you get a product support network around the world."


yeah, because the A318 and A319neo are selling like hot cakes....As far as I am concerned, the A318 is and always was dead, and so is the A319, with only 50 orders for the A319neo. Wouldn't be surprised if they cancel the A319neo and convert all the orders to the A320neo.

The CSeries has 2 variants, and as far as I'm concerned, so does the A320 !

Furthermore, the fact that Airbus and Bombardier met to discuss a potential (full or partial) buy-out of the CSeries clearly demonstrates the threat the CSeries represents to Airbus. There is no denying that fact.
The new 737 family coming out has two models that airlines buy. The new 700 is not selling. The 600 is not even being contemplated going forward.

On the Airbus side, it is the same thing the 320 and 321 are ones airlines are buying. The smaller jets can be offered but it airlines are not interested what is the point.

So basically CSeries, Boeing and Airbus has families with only two effective models.
     
     
  #2479  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 10:53 PM
casper's Avatar
casper casper is online now
Registered User
 
Join Date: Nov 2011
Location: Victoria
Posts: 12,914
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkydivePilot View Post
Well, in recent years, Bellingham, WA has been quite busy for a number of years serving the Lower Mainland. Besides that, unlike Vancouver, Regina has shit all these days to U.S. destinations (with higher fares) and has significant passenger bleeding to Minot ND. (Allegiant)
Only one major airline (Alaska) serves the airport. Mostly connections to Seattle (their hub) and flights to Hawaii or Las Vegas. Destinations that have the rock bottom pricing out of YVR.
     
     
  #2480  
Old Posted Jan 13, 2016, 11:52 PM
Klazu's Avatar
Klazu Klazu is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2012
Location: Above Metro Vancouver clouds
Posts: 10,408
Is someone seriously still finding it cheaper to fly out of US airports with CAD at 0.69 USD? Must be quite a deal to justify the trip down there...
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 3:07 PM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.