A lot of people don't understand that structures like bridges and skyscrapers are built to move around. If they didn't, the kinetic energy put on them by wind and earth forces would cause them to break very easily. The vibrations and swaying are required to disperse the energy they're absorbing, and actually makes them stronger.
We have numerous viaducts connecting the city to the port, and if you stand with one foot on either side of an expansion joint when a transport goes by, you can actually feel each side move independently of the other. It's pretty neat.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shreddog
FWIW, it may be possible to bypass the bridge as you used to be able to take bush roads around Polly lake to Cameron falls, but not sure if they're still maintained and definitely not fun in January 
|
It's not passable, people have tried. The bush road between the Cameron Falls Bailey Bridge and the Trans-Canada Pipeline are too overgrown and poorly maintained, they've essentially deer trails. ATVs and Snowmachines can do it, but passenger vehicles can't. Maybe a 4x4 Jeep or something, but not a Hyundai Elantra and definitely not a transport.
Quote:
Originally Posted by swimmer_spe
Is it on Google maps?
|
No. It's barely even visible in Google Earth. Their maps don't actually connect the lines, so unless you know where to look, you won't even find it. Someone who lived in the area had to explain it to me.
Quote:
Originally Posted by shreddog
And would be totally unneeded. With the double bridge over the McKenzie river, the only pinch points are the Black Sturgeon bridge and the Nipigon bridge - until is is finished. The road itself is not the issue as if anything happened (culvert washout) it could be repaired in a days and the traffic loads aren't that high on this stretch of the road.
Inconvenient yes, but not critical infrastructure in the true sense of the words.
|
There are also bush roads and side roads all along it, so detours are possible. The Nipigon River is truly the only point along the highway where there is absolutely no viable alternative.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
Given the importance to the country, though, we should most definitely have had twin bridge spans in place there sooner than 2017, don't you think?
This isn't the first time the country being "cut in two" in this way has occurred, if I recall.
|
It happens numerous times per year. Highway 11 just north of the bridge was closed most of the day because of a transport truck fire, in fact. According to CBC, roughly $36 billion dollars worth of goods cross that bridge annually. It's nothing compared to the 401, but that's equivalent to more than twice Northwestern Ontario's GDP.
Thunder Bay got its first interchange in 2012. I've been saying it for years but I don't think you guys realize how far behind highway infrastructure is up here.

We don't even have rest stops! At all! None! If you drive Highway 11, it's almost imperative that you bring a full jerry can with you (enough to fill your tank half way), or you might be fucked. No cell service either. The busiest highway in Northwestern Ontario is a four lane road with no median, and traffic lights roughly every kilometre. Street lights were installed on it in 2011!
We are
remote.
Since 2003 the province has resumed highway building here (Mike Harris cancelled virtually all of it in 1995) and the bridge was supposed to be the crown jewel of the project. Thunder Bay's expressway will possibly converted to a freeway in 2018 and beyond (the big project set to follow this one), but that's not set in stone.
Quote:
Originally Posted by Acajack
It wasn't really something like "September 2015" that I had in mind.
More like "1972".
|
1972 is probably when they would have done it, too. The Thunder Bay Expressway was built right around that time, it would have been logical.
They didn't actually complete Highway 17 until 1960. Traffic between Thunder Bay and Toronto before then used Highway 11, though most people would have taken a train or plane to get there instead.