HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West


 

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
Prev Previous Post   Next Post Next
     
     
  #11  
Old Posted Jan 11, 2016, 7:11 AM
i-215's Avatar
i-215 i-215 is offline
Exit 298
 
Join Date: Sep 2003
Location: Inland Empire (CA)
Posts: 3,488
Quote:
Originally Posted by Liberty Wellsian View Post
7 units per acre somehow constitutes transit oriented development? OK?

Honestly I think that 10 units per acre is the largest lot that should be enforced by a municipality in the Salt Lake Metro(lots can be larger but cities won't force them to be). Even then 10 per acre does not constitute TOD, let alone 7. It just ****** doesn't.
This county drives me nuts. I'm trying to help my parents design a smaller house on a 6000 square foot lot. Sure, SLCo allows a house on a 6000 square foot lot --- but then they require a 30 foot backyard, 25 foot front yard, 11 foot sideyards ... by the time I was done, I'm left with only 25x45 feet to plan an entire house.

We'll never get compact development when the county requires this sort of nonsense. It forces people to have to zone larger lots.
__________________
I've stopped caring. Good luck, America
Reply With Quote
     
     
End
 
 
 

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > United States > Mountain West
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 7:41 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.