Quote:
Originally Posted by Knight Hospitaller
Yeah, I noticed commentary that this was a New Yorker. Even less reason to expect that there'd be focus on anything but financials for this property.
|
I suspect the guy may be a bit sour on Philly anyway: apparently the Tivoli project was aggravating and didn't make as much as it was thought it should ("it costs as much to build in Philly as in NY with a fraction of the profit potential" blah blah blah). Not that the national economy collapsing at the same time could have had anything to do with reduced profits. And not that land costs fifty times as much in NYC.
Anyway, after a bitter Tivoli experience, I think our NY friend has washed his hands of the place: development in Philly can't compare with development in NYC, so screw it. Go for the quick, low risk money. Even though many other developers seem to be making money in Philly about now. I'd imagine the guy's cost basis in the site is very low, given how long he's owned it. So he'd probably make money no matter what he does, it's seems more a question of how much and how quickly. How I wish he'd have just sold out to a local developer with some balls and gotten the fuck out of Philly.
One reason why we need better land use planning - so as not to be completely vulnerable to the vagaries and mood swings of individual developers and speculators.