Quote:
Originally Posted by esquire
In my experience, American airports tend to work reasonably well but they are usually unpleasant places. They all feel like overgrown bus terminals. The fact that most are built in stages with a bunch of small terminals doesn't help... you end up with something like ORD which is one of the world's biggest but basically feels like dozens of the old Winnipeg Airport laid end to end.
There are some US airports which are nicer than others, especially among the tier 2 ones like RDU. But the only large US airport I've been to that impressed me is DEN... which is basically a big new Asian airport that somehow landed in the US.
|
+1.
The Americans are capable of making things of impressive taste and beauty, and they are able to design user-friendly products like the iPhone, but they just 🞵🞵🞵🞵 at trying to give anything publicly-owned any kind of flair. Everything is just as utilitarian as possible.
This also infects a lot of their corporations' presentability - even to the customers who should matter. My friend joked about going to the United First Class Lounge at ORD and being presented with a plate of cheddar cheese with a few grapes on top like it was some low level business conference in 1995. Compare the layout and the substance of an American in-flight magazine with, say, Air Canada's
enRoute, and you'll know what I mean.
PS: This isn't an "Anglo" thing, since I find that public infrastructure in the UK - airports, trains, buses, mailboxes, phone booths, the public realm - is some of the most attractive in the world.
PPS: other than Denver, Detroit is another Asian-quality airport in the middle of the US. That's ironic considering what kind of city Detroit is.
PPPS: The most international and cosmopolitan of US cities have the worst airports. All 3 of NY's airports are deplorable; LAX is embarassing and so is ORD - especially the AA terminal.