HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada


Closed Thread

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4781  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2015, 4:21 AM
MTLskyline's Avatar
MTLskyline MTLskyline is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2006
Posts: 4,258
Quote:
Originally Posted by SkahHigh View Post
Site prep has started for Le Drummond - 24 floors

Not a big fan. This will essentially be a bigger version of Le Metropol....

Getting tired of charcoal brick and grey aluminum everywhere.

Quote:
Originally Posted by lake of the nations View Post
     
     
  #4782  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2015, 5:26 AM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by dleung View Post
Foster's simple grid design is the opposite of "avant garde". Have to agree to disagree on Florian/1StThomas/ornament... I'd be embarrassed to live in either of those.
Looking back at my comment your criticism is valid. Im guilty of having a traditionalist bias. This design is a creative concept that demonstrates an excellent awareness of its context in the skyline. The podium of this proposal is where Foster loses me. Fixing the podium is what would seperate it from being an X-Condo quality building from a LAGO quality building.

My only beef is that (from what I can see in the render), the street level of this building dosent seem to embrace the golden ratio or Miesian aesthetic. Theres no creative integration of shops or a concourse, neither is there any landscaping or water feature. Hopefully this wont be a repeat of the U Condo townhomes fronting onto Bay Street?

The overhangs seems to have a brutalist aesthetic. It lacks the warmth and big city grandeur of buildings designed by IM Pei and partners. Place Ville Marie is modernism done right imho and would be welcome in Canada. Montreal has tonnes of massive slab buildings that meet the street well and offer well integrated atriums/underground shopping. World Trade Center Montreal comes to mind and proves that po-mo can be done tastefully.

Toronto desperately needs this. If I see another so called luxury building with exposed concrete pillars Ill probably puke.

The only large scale foster design Imo that would suit Yorkville is something more subtle like the 425 Park Avenue proposal. 425 Park Avenue gets everything right in my opinion. If only Foster could marry this contemporary "GE Building" Yorkville concept with the quality and attention to detail in his NY proposal, we'd have a landmark building.

Last edited by yaletown_fella; Nov 21, 2015 at 5:41 AM.
     
     
  #4783  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2015, 6:47 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 22,898
You're comparables are perplexing. It's a residential building on a very small site. There isn't a podium either.
     
     
  #4784  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2015, 6:55 PM
niwell's Avatar
niwell niwell is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 11,657
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post

Some of the ugliest buildings have the best bones. I wouldn't be embarrassed by how a building looked.

Probably the nicest place I have lived was a dirt cheap 3 bedroom condo in a drab 1970s commie-block in Ottawa. It was huge, well laid out and you couldn't hear a thing from the neighbours. As much as I love the "charm" of something built in the 1890s I wish I could transplant that unit to my current location!
     
     
  #4785  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2015, 7:07 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 22,898
Buildings like 1132 Bay to me are representative of what I think of Yorkville. Modest looking building hiding an exclusive doorman building with 25 units over 18 floors.

Top of my list is always 423 Avenue Road. Dleung would love this. West Vancouver massing. Ugly on the outside. Deplorable on the inside. Full floor with windows on all sides with easily the best skyline view.

Found a listing

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=en-9gtXw7cc
     
     
  #4786  
Old Posted Nov 21, 2015, 7:14 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 22,898
Re: U Condo townhouses.

Too often I get the impression that a building without ground floor retail is a failure. Not every building can support successful retail. Sure this is Bay Street and not Charles Street East but, the east side of Bay has always been difficult on the retail end. The last thing Bay needs is another drycleaner or Tims. These live work townhouses offer the opportunity for something more creative. Perfect for a live in studio or small office.
     
     
  #4787  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2015, 3:13 AM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,423
The entire U-Condos development is quite tastefully designed. While I agree the UCondo townhomes as live/work spaces is preferable to any of the 90s/early 2000's subway/dry cleaners retail podiums along that street I dont think upper Bay street is devoid of potential to become a respectable grand retail boulevard. Burano gives us an optimistic glimpse of what could come if development continues to spring up in the area.

Townhomes on the lot just seems like poor foresight to me, as does no retail in this Foster development.
     
     
  #4788  
Old Posted Nov 22, 2015, 3:16 AM
yaletown_fella yaletown_fella is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 3,423
Quote:
Originally Posted by WhipperSnapper View Post
You're comparables are perplexing. It's a residential building on a very small site. There isn't a podium either.
I think the majority of buildings without podiums usually fail to enhance the pedestrian realm.
     
     
  #4789  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2015, 10:17 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,726
The Carlyle 128 Peter Street. Am I the only one who dislikes the chess board pattern on it? I think it would be a fine building without it.

Posted on: http://mycondopro.co
     
     
  #4790  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2015, 10:25 PM
Innsertnamehere's Avatar
Innsertnamehere Innsertnamehere is online now
 
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 12,909
looks preliminary, I find Aa designs are — at first and get better as they approach actual construction.
     
     
  #4791  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2015, 10:36 PM
Nouvellecosse's Avatar
Nouvellecosse Nouvellecosse is online now
 
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 11,376
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
The Carlyle 128 Peter Street. Am I the only one who dislikes the chess board pattern on it? I think it would be a fine building without it.
Finally! Something you and dleung can agree on.
     
     
  #4792  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2015, 10:52 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 22,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaletown_fella View Post
The entire U-Condos development is quite tastefully designed. While I agree the UCondo townhomes as live/work spaces is preferable to any of the 90s/early 2000's subway/dry cleaners retail podiums along that street I dont think upper Bay street is devoid of potential to become a respectable grand retail boulevard. Burano gives us an optimistic glimpse of what could come if development continues to spring up in the area.

Townhomes on the lot just seems like poor foresight to me, as does no retail in this Foster development.
Bay Street is fully developed with additions like Burano and U. I don't see an opportunity to transform a residential street into a destination here.
     
     
  #4793  
Old Posted Nov 23, 2015, 10:56 PM
WhipperSnapper's Avatar
WhipperSnapper WhipperSnapper is offline
 
Join Date: Sep 2002
Posts: 22,898
Quote:
Originally Posted by yaletown_fella View Post
I think the majority of buildings without podiums usually fail to enhance the pedestrian realm.
I find most podiums the lowest common denominator. I prefer a building designed head to toe to fit its urban context over a tower simply plopped on top of a (lowrise) base.

The one rendering of the street level reveals the restored heritage on Scollard. No idea what interesting spaces will be available on Bay.
     
     
  #4794  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 6:21 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 22,842
Our first look at the eastern half of Q Block East Village, also known as the Verve Block. At 25 storeys it looks to be identical in height to Verve 1, around 86 meters. Nothing special, but the podium does have some potential (aside from the loading bay)...


http://www.axiomcost.com/images/AXIOM.pdf
     
     
  #4795  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 6:59 AM
gunnar777 gunnar777 is offline
 
Join Date: Aug 2013
Posts: 234
personally, I like Le Drummond, although I like just about anything in Montréal, which so sorely needs some new buildings.

Last edited by Ramako; Nov 28, 2015 at 2:03 AM. Reason: off-topic
     
     
  #4796  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 1:58 PM
urbandreamer's Avatar
urbandreamer urbandreamer is offline
 
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 4,656
Here's some slightly better renderings of Carlyle's Peter & Richmond project by aA.

Having copied aA's point tower formula for mainstream glass & concrete towers, I can understand their limitations for window dressing: eg here's one where I knocked off Peter Street Condos

I'd still take 1000 of these aA-designed towers over 1000 designed by P+S or that dreck you see in Edmonton etc.
     
     
  #4797  
Old Posted Nov 24, 2015, 5:26 PM
TorontoDrew's Avatar
TorontoDrew TorontoDrew is offline
 
Join Date: Nov 2014
Posts: 10,726
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nouvellecosse View Post
Finally! Something you and dleung can agree on.
Now all we need is WhipperSnapper to agree and this will be a day for the history books.

Moving past that it looks like they are starting to do some work on the sales office for this. It looks like a bit of a cross between 101 Peter Street and the King Charlotte.
     
     
  #4798  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2015, 3:56 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 22,842
I like the checkerboard-ish look of the building on Carlyle.
     
     
  #4799  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2015, 4:09 AM
Black Star Black Star is offline
 
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 7,259
Quote:
Originally Posted by TorontoDrew View Post
The Carlyle 128 Peter Street. Am I the only one who dislikes the chess board pattern on it? I think it would be a fine building without it.

Posted on: http://mycondopro.co


I must say....I'm a fan of this one.
     
     
  #4800  
Old Posted Nov 26, 2015, 5:05 AM
Chadillaccc's Avatar
Chadillaccc Chadillaccc is offline
 
Join Date: Feb 2011
Posts: 22,842
This is our first look at this one. Doesn't look final yet but it is in line with what we've heard about it. As long as the crane is hidden and that god awful "Century Gardens" sign isn't on it, this one will be pretty cool. It is part of the larger redevelopment 2/3 of a city block. The tower sits on the site of a former strip mall which has already been leveled, and the park which surrounds it is about to be completely rejuvenated after 40 or so years...


Century Gardens - 100 meters




     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Closed Thread

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 1:01 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.