Quote:
Originally Posted by BVictor1
We'll see. Landmarks my have sought a reduction in height. I just emailed Blair and he replied that his sources stated the 933'. That still may be to the underside of the top floor or it may be the building height. It's not too bad of a snip.
|
I see what's going on. Blair isn't responsible for the typo but it is a typo just follow the references.
Bottom of page 7
Zoning Agenda says 933' but clearly references document #02015-6394 filed on September 24th which is this
document which has the height at 993' minus mechanical or 1030'
Threaded Mode