Quote:
Originally Posted by AaronPGH
C'mon guys, let's get real here. Just because Google resides there doesn't mean they get a pass. We dish plenty of scorn out to much better looking developments. If this were proposed tomorrow you'd all be freaking out.
|
Well, I did say it was a bit of a mess . . .
I don't have a huge problem with the Urban Active portion of the project, considering all that is being wrapped around the parking structure.
The design of the hotel 🞵🞵🞵🞵🞵, but that isn't really the main problem on that side.
The things I don't get are: that useless lawn along Penn; the Coffee Roasters and West Elm "out buildings" that look like they belong in a suburban mall; and that horrible little parking lot which is like 70+% driving lane.
The good news, though, is I don't see why you couldn't redevelop some or all of those particular elements some day into something more appropriate for the site. Which could also serve to hide the less-than-attractive hotel design too.