HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #261  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 12:34 AM
king10 king10 is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 2,776
Quote:
Originally Posted by thistleclub View Post
City of Hamilton – Public Works:

The work will take place, weather permitting, from Monday, January 12 to Friday, January 16 between the hours of 5:00 a.m. and 3:00 p.m. To safely complete these traffic improvements, intermittent lane closures in this area of the RHVP will be required. The contractor will not work during the peak directional flow time periods to minimize disruptions to commuters during the morning and afternoon rush hours.
why wouldn't they do this work on weekends like they do with the Gardiner in Toronto?

shut it all down for 48 hours and get it done, not partial lane closures during the work week between 8 and 3 for 5 days
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #262  
Old Posted Jan 15, 2015, 12:36 AM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,302
That's probably considered doing overtime. If that's the case the City would have to pay extra for the work.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #263  
Old Posted May 25, 2015, 2:15 PM
thistleclub thistleclub is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 3,729
City of Hamilton studies widening Red Hill
(Hamilton Spectator, Andrew Dreschel, May 25 2015)

Only eight years after it opened, the city is already looking at widening the Red Hill Valley Parkway.

The good news is the eight-kilometre four-lane highway is built to be seamlessly expanded to six lanes of traffic.

The bad news for Coun. Doug Conley — who argues the road is already too packed at rush hour — is the report won't be ready for a year.

"To have a plan a year from now is fine, but that means it's another four or five years before we do it.

"Maybe I'm a little anxious, but I can see gridlock all over the place."

The Ward 9 councillor first raised the issue of enlarging both the Red Hill and Lincoln Alexander parkways to handle growing traffic volumes at a recent committee meeting.

Conley says the residential development boom in the upper Stoney Creek portion of his ward and neighbouring Binbrook is only going to make a bad situation worse.

"With all this construction going on, I don't know where we're going to put all the cars."

According to city manager Chris Murray, widening the sister highways, which connect the QEW to the 403 across the Mountain, is part of the ongoing review of the city's transportation master plan, which is expected to be finished in the next 12 months.

The report will provide recommendations on the time frame for expansion.

City engineering director Gary Moore figures widening both highways would cost $80-$100 million, a significant challenge given that the city is currently spending about $48 million a year on road work when it should be spending $180 million to meet its needs.



Read it in full here.
__________________
"Where architectural imagination is absent, the case is hopeless." - Louis Sullivan
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #264  
Old Posted May 25, 2015, 2:55 PM
HillStreetBlues HillStreetBlues is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: KW/Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 995
I was pretty frustrated to see that on the cover of the paper this morning. The article did point out that the City is performing only a fraction of the necessary road work each year, and so perhaps cannot afford a project of this scale, but mostly quoted the local councillor insisting that we need more road capacity without doing much challenging of that. Induced demand is in other places a pretty well-accepted principle- making the expressways six lanes won’t ultimately do anything but increase pollution and sprawl, and make our municipal budget even less sustainable. What’s our infrastructure deficit again? Wasn’t it just last year that staff said we would soon have no choice but let roads go to gravel for want of repair funds. It isn’t as though we have particularly low taxes here…

For less money, we could implement express bus routes on the mountain and the ‘burbs that would make much better use of the existing four lanes. That possibility- the possibility of moving any of those people by transit- is conspicuously absent from the article.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #265  
Old Posted May 27, 2015, 7:11 AM
bigguy1231 bigguy1231 is offline
Concerned Citizen
 
Join Date: Mar 2009
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,348
The need for expansion of the road doesn't need to be challenged, the numbers show the need. Both roads are running over capacity as of now. From 6 am to 7 pm the traffic is bumper to bumper and at rush hours it is stop and go. Express buses would do nothing to alleviate the problems since the people who use their cars are never going to get on buses.

As for the assertion this is somehow a problem created by sprawl and suburbanites, neither road runs through the suburbs, it is totally within the boundaries of the old city of Hamilton. I might also add that the areas adjacent to the highways were for the most part well developed long before either road was built. These are not roads that were built to facilitate urban sprawl but rather to service already developed areas. Most of the neighbourhoods adjacent to the highways were built 50 or 60 years ago.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #266  
Old Posted May 27, 2015, 1:11 PM
interr0bangr interr0bangr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jan 2014
Location: Landsdale
Posts: 559
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy1231 View Post
The need for expansion of the road doesn't need to be challenged, the numbers show the need. Both roads are running over capacity as of now. From 6 am to 7 pm the traffic is bumper to bumper and at rush hours it is stop and go. Express buses would do nothing to alleviate the problems since the people who use their cars are never going to get on buses.

As for the assertion this is somehow a problem created by sprawl and suburbanites, neither road runs through the suburbs, it is totally within the boundaries of the old city of Hamilton. I might also add that the areas adjacent to the highways were for the most part well developed long before either road was built. These are not roads that were built to facilitate urban sprawl but rather to service already developed areas. Most of the neighbourhoods adjacent to the highways were built 50 or 60 years ago.
So much wrong with your post. Please read up on "induced demand". The RHVP was designed for people to get to and from the QEW and LINC (aka the suburbs) without having to go through any urban areas, to say otherwise makes the mind boggle.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #267  
Old Posted May 27, 2015, 1:50 PM
CaptainKirk CaptainKirk is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2011
Posts: 1,449
Adding an extra lane only adds an extra lane of traffic.

It will be filled a soon as it is added and will accomplish little to nothing.

The real solution is to plan differently, more efficiently.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #268  
Old Posted May 27, 2015, 2:11 PM
thmx thmx is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Posts: 5,381
Quote:
Originally Posted by bigguy1231 View Post

As for the assertion this is somehow a problem created by sprawl and suburbanites, neither road runs through the suburbs, it is totally within the boundaries of the old city of Hamilton. I might also add that the areas adjacent to the highways were for the most part well developed long before either road was built. These are not roads that were built to facilitate urban sprawl but rather to service already developed areas. Most of the neighbourhoods adjacent to the highways were built 50 or 60 years ago.
There are homes for over 30,000 people currently under construction right off of the Mud Street and Stone Church Road ramps. The problem is without a doubt being caused by suburban sprawl.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #269  
Old Posted May 27, 2015, 5:37 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,800
Ever noticed how at rush hour, almost all the traffic congestion is going South to all those new subdivisions on the East mountain and in Elfrida?

Yeah...
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #270  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2015, 9:35 PM
mattgrande's Avatar
mattgrande mattgrande is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jul 2010
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 1,245
https://twitter.com/JoeyColeman/stat...84882471628800

Quote:
Council vote to start process of expanding RHVP and Linc to six lanes. Notice of Motion just put on table. #YHMgov
__________________
Livin' At The Corner Of Dude And Catastrophe.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #271  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2015, 9:35 PM
HillStreetBlues HillStreetBlues is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: KW/Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 995
The Public Works Committee has voted to study widening both the Red Hill and Lincoln Alexander expressways.

The cost has been estimated at one hundred million dollars. I honestly can not see how this is affordable...it doesn't take a genius to realize that more capacity will just spur more suburban sprawl that will quickly eat up that capacity. Hamilton has a huge infrastructure deficit, and it seems like this will do little more than add to it.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #272  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 3:44 AM
coalminecanary coalminecanary is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 1,421
This is just insane.
__________________
no clever signoff.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #273  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 5:21 PM
lucasmascotto's Avatar
lucasmascotto lucasmascotto is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Feb 2012
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 356
@SteelTown Can we update the title of this thread to just; "Red Hill Expressway"?
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #274  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 5:38 PM
matt602's Avatar
matt602 matt602 is offline
Hammer'd
 
Join Date: Jan 2006
Location: Hamilton, ON
Posts: 4,800
Ridiculous.
__________________
"Above all, Hamilton must learn to think like a city, not a suburban hybrid where residents drive everywhere. What makes Hamilton interesting is the fact it's a city. The sprawl that surrounds it, which can be found all over North America, is running out of time."
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #275  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 5:48 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,421
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillStreetBlues View Post

The cost has been estimated at one hundred million dollars. I honestly can not see how this is affordable...it doesn't take a genius to realize that more capacity will just spur more suburban sprawl that will quickly eat up that capacity. Hamilton has a huge infrastructure deficit, and it seems like this will do little more than add to it.
This is a study. Construction likely would not happen for a long time. Best time to do it is when the pavement / road foundations start to wear out and the overpasses need mid-life maintenance work.

The roads are designed with expansion in mind, so this would not be a difficult job.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #276  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 6:53 PM
HillStreetBlues HillStreetBlues is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2013
Location: KW/Hamilton, Ontario
Posts: 995
Quote:
Originally Posted by haljackey View Post
This is a study. Construction likely would not happen for a long time. Best time to do it is when the pavement / road foundations start to wear out and the overpasses need mid-life maintenance work.

The roads are designed with expansion in mind, so this would not be a difficult job.
To hear some of council (and many suburbanites) talking, it's practically a foregone conclusion that the expressways will be widened, and the sooner the better. It's true that they were designed to accommodate easy expansion, but that says nothing of the cost of it. Can we afford it?

I just realized the RHVP opened exactly eight years ago. And it's already "gridlock"? Maybe it's because the expressway enabled the sprawl that will inevitably lead to increased traffic.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #277  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 7:31 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,302
I'd rather have the money spent on widening the 403 from four to six lanes from the Meadowlands area to Aldershot instead of widening the Linc.

Most of the congestion on the Linc is because of people trying to merge onto the 403.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #278  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 7:48 PM
sonysnob sonysnob is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2011
Posts: 1,780
Quote:
Originally Posted by HillStreetBlues View Post
To hear some of council (and many suburbanites) talking, it's practically a foregone conclusion that the expressways will be widened, and the sooner the better. It's true that they were designed to accommodate easy expansion, but that says nothing of the cost of it. Can we afford it?

I just realized the RHVP opened exactly eight years ago. And it's already "gridlock"? Maybe it's because the expressway enabled the sprawl that will inevitably lead to increased traffic.
The widening of the expressways in Hamilton was a forgone conclusion. They were always designed to be widened, right from construction. It shouldn't be a shocking development given the number of building permits that have been issued on the east mountain.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #279  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 8:15 PM
haljackey's Avatar
haljackey haljackey is offline
User Registered
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Location: London, Ontario
Posts: 3,421
The Linc/Red Hill's volume isn't coming from just increases in local use, but from its use for long distance traffic.

They have taken some stress off 403/QEW. I use them instead to get to Niagara Falls from London ever since the Red Hill opened.

I'd say that building new highways will do more to encourage sprawl rather than widening these highways.

New highways don't even necessarily encourage sprawl. Example: northern London is sprawling like a weed and there are no highways anywhere around the area.
__________________
My Twitter

My Simcity Stuff
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #280  
Old Posted Nov 3, 2015, 8:44 PM
SteelTown's Avatar
SteelTown SteelTown is offline
It's Hammer Time
 
Join Date: Mar 2004
Location: Hamilton
Posts: 20,302
^And that highlights why the city should look at tolling these expressways. It's a municipal expressway that receives no provincial funds, all comes from municipal taxes. The only possible exemption to tolls I would allow is industrial trucks.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Hamilton > Transportation & Infrastructure
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 5:14 PM.

     
SkyscraperPage.com - Privacy Statement - Top

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.