HomeDiagramsDatabaseMapsForum About
     

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa


Reply

 
Thread Tools Display Modes
     
     
  #4541  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 5:07 AM
danishh danishh is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2013
Posts: 429
i'm all for the portrait gallery plan too, wonder if the liberals can find room for that spending in their infrastructure plan. Safe to say it's too late to get it up and running for some time in 2017?

portrait gallery, fixing up 24 sussex, solving our science museum connundrum... would really nice to see the liberals play catch-up on these lost projects of the past decade. Hey, maybe by the end of this parliament we'll see a downtown arena approved as well!
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4542  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 11:40 AM
Buggys Buggys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 659
What is the point of a portrait gallery? It's a waste of money. Lots of portraits can be easily viewed online.

A science museum with hands-on displays & activities on the other hand, brings more value for the public.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4543  
Old Posted Oct 30, 2015, 11:44 AM
Buggys Buggys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 659
Reducing parking requirements will just increase the hassle for snow removal. The key to increasing density is additional height and better public transportation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4544  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2015, 3:14 AM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggys View Post
What is the point of a portrait gallery? It's a waste of money. Lots of portraits can be easily viewed online.
I reject the premise of that question. And clearly the Harper Government did as well. Sadly they couldn't make the deal work in Calgary.

A portrait gallery is something that explains the story of the nation through the people who built it. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that we are the only G8 country without one.

I was fortunate enough to have had a private visit to the archives facility in Gatineau where I was led into one of the vaults and shown (at a considerable distance) several portraits and told the stories of the nation builders behind them.

I specifically recall a stirring portrait of John George Diefenbaker and told of his landmark achievements of Canada's Bill of Rights and Canada's first female minister of the crown.

Seeing the same thing on my iPad is at best a facsimile. At worst a lost opportunity.

Think of the people visiting Ottawa, and ask yourself: Are esoteric works of art hanging in the national gallery more accessible and relevant to the Tim Hortons crowd than portraits of real Canadians who have left an enduring legacy for today?

It's about our self-respect as a nation, and telling our stories to a citezenry weened on dancing with the Stars.

Last edited by Norman Bates; Oct 31, 2015 at 4:09 AM.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4545  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2015, 5:23 AM
m0nkyman m0nkyman is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Oct 2006
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 2,032
Well said sir. Quoted for truth:
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Bates View Post
I reject the premise of that question. And clearly the Harper Government did as well. Sadly they couldn't make the deal work in Calgary.

A portrait gallery is something that explains the story of the nation through the people who built it. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that we are the only G8 country without one.

I was fortunate enough to have had a private visit to the archives facility in Gatineau where I was led into one of the vaults and shown (at a considerable distance) several portraits and told the stories of the nation builders behind them.

I specifically recall a stirring portrait of John George Diefenbaker and told of his landmark achievements of Canada's Bill of Rights and Canada's first female minister of the crown.

Seeing the same thing on my iPad is at best a facsimile. At worst a lost opportunity.

Think of the people visiting Ottawa, and ask yourself: Are esoteric works of art hanging in the national gallery more accessible and relevant to the Tim Hortons crowd than portraits of real Canadians who have left an enduring legacy for today?

It's about our self-respect as a nation, and telling our stories to a citezenry weened on dancing with the Stars.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4546  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2015, 12:11 PM
Buggys Buggys is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Dec 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 659
If the emphasis is Canadian history (& key people involved), then just call it that. I'm not opposed to a Museum of Canadian history, or inclusion of it in an existing museum -- e.g. National Gallery of Art and Canadian History.

Canadian history includes more than key people though, so it should include relics of significance as well -- totem poles, traditional canoes, mini models of traditional logging operations, etc.

We don't need a big expensive museum full of famous people's portraits -- Sir John A. MacDonald, Pocahontas, Hitler, Kim Kardashian.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4547  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2015, 1:12 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,027
Quote:
Originally Posted by Buggys View Post
We don't need a big expensive museum full of famous people's portraits -- Sir John A. MacDonald, Pocahontas, Hitler, Kim Kardashian.
Again you fail to understand both the purpose and need of a national portrait gallery by presenting arguments that are utterly divergent from its goals.

Only one of the names you cite is Canadian. And that is the only one that had an impact on the development of Canada and its people.

To paraphrase a famous Canadian: 'Friends, let me be clear' a Canadian portrait gallery is not for the display of black light posters of Jim Hendrix, national enquirer clippings of Avril Lavigne, or pop culture portrayals of foreign nationals. It is for Canadians, by Canadians and of Canadians.

People like Clifford Sifton, Marshall McLuhan, Laura Secord, and pretty much anyone who is a companion of the order of Canada. Perhaps also anyone who was given honorary Canadian citizenship.

It is for people who stood and delivered. People who did what needed to be done for Canada when others were too frightened or apathetic to take the necessary action. It is not for people who sit on the sidelines and snip at others for doing something when they themselves do nothing. It is to inspire our sense of nation. And as we know, people are the core of a nation.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4548  
Old Posted Oct 31, 2015, 3:59 PM
acottawa acottawa is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 18,918
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Bates View Post
I reject the premise of that question. And clearly the Harper Government did as well. Sadly they couldn't make the deal work in Calgary.

A portrait gallery is something that explains the story of the nation through the people who built it. I wouldn't be surprised to learn that we are the only G8 country without one.

If G8 means US and UK.

I have no particular opinion one way or the other, but it seems to me proponents need to make a case for why telling the story of the nation through the people who built it isn't the mandate of the history museum (where biographies could be weaved into the historical context). It sounds like what a lot of people really want is a Hall of Fame, which really doesn't need to be tied to portraits (and would probably get more visitors if it wasn't.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4549  
Old Posted Nov 2, 2015, 10:59 PM
silvergate's Avatar
silvergate silvergate is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2014
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 629
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Bates View Post
Again you fail to understand both the purpose and need of a national portrait gallery by presenting arguments that are utterly divergent from its goals.

Only one of the names you cite is Canadian. And that is the only one that had an impact on the development of Canada and its people.

To paraphrase a famous Canadian: 'Friends, let me be clear' a Canadian portrait gallery is not for the display of black light posters of Jim Hendrix, national enquirer clippings of Avril Lavigne, or pop culture portrayals of foreign nationals. It is for Canadians, by Canadians and of Canadians.

People like Clifford Sifton, Marshall McLuhan, Laura Secord, and pretty much anyone who is a companion of the order of Canada. Perhaps also anyone who was given honorary Canadian citizenship.

It is for people who stood and delivered. People who did what needed to be done for Canada when others were too frightened or apathetic to take the necessary action. It is not for people who sit on the sidelines and snip at others for doing something when they themselves do nothing. It is to inspire our sense of nation. And as we know, people are the core of a nation.
If you could make that museum actually worth visiting (like every portrait is actually a TV that plays a heritage minute), people might actually care. As it is, how many people, especially those "weened on dancing with the stars", would actually visit.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4550  
Old Posted Nov 10, 2015, 6:22 PM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,687
259 Beechwood Ave. | ? m | 2 fl | Proposed

More development on Beechwood Ave...



Plans and renderings:
http://ottwatch.ca/meetings/file/318147/...xiTDYLKsWHzcAvc_w&bvm=bv.106923889,d.eWE


Quote:
Built heritage sub-committee gives greenlight for demolition of Beechwood home
Resident asks councillors to consider cultural heritage impact, community design plan

By Jen McIntosh
Ottawa East News, Nov 9, 2015


One resident wants the city to consider new uses for properties along Beechwood Avenue.

Susan Ross, a resident of Corona Avenue, spoke to the city’s built heritage sub-committee about an application to demolish 259 Beechwood Ave. to make way for three, two-storey units with varying setbacks. The sub-committee has given the greenlight for the home in question to be demolished.

Ross told the sub-committee that she thought the proponent – Arcon Homes – was co-operative and neighbourly, but would have liked to see the applicant pay more attention to the cultural heritage impact assessment.

“The heritage assessment was limited in scope,” she said, adding it didn’t take into consideration the landscape.

Ross said the Beechwood Community Design Plan wasn’t taken into consideration as part of the assessment.

“The boundaries need to be better defined,” she said, adding she’d like to see a gateway into the area along Hemlock Road.

“We don’t see rowhouses with separate garages on a typical main street,” she said.

Part of the design plan includes a main street feel to Beechwood Avenue – something that won’t work if there are too many residential units approved along the thoroughfare, Ross said.

Rideau-Rockliffe Coun. Tobi Nussbaum, who is the sub-committee chair, said Ross raised points that needed to be considered as part of the CDP and the Rockliffe Park Secondary Plan.

“I can assure you that a lot of thought will be going into the CDP,” he said.

The original structure is a one-and-a-half storey single family home. It was built in 1953. It fronts onto Beechwood Avenue and has a stone wall marking the change in grade from the sidewalk to the front yard. The zoning already permits multiple residences and other ancillary uses.

The city’s planning committee will hear the application at its Nov. 24 meeting.

http://www.ottawacommunitynews.com/news-...nlight-for-demolition-of-beechwood-home/
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4551  
Old Posted Nov 11, 2015, 1:08 AM
McC's Avatar
McC McC is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Apr 2010
Posts: 3,057
She's right, townhouses with garages are not right for a Traditional Main Street, they should make up infill on the blocks off of the Trad Main St.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4552  
Old Posted Nov 12, 2015, 3:09 PM
Capital Shaun Capital Shaun is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: May 2012
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 862
Quote:
Originally Posted by rocketphish View Post
More development on Beechwood Ave...

Nice building but row houses like this don't belong on a mainstreet like Beechwood.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4553  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2015, 1:48 AM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,027
I heard that longtime CFRA morning man Steve Madely has "retired".

Let us hope that Lorne Greene won't be far behind and that their replacements won't be sun news alumni.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4554  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2015, 1:50 AM
Acajack's Avatar
Acajack Acajack is offline
Gros Méchant Loup
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Location: SSP Graveyard
Posts: 72,949
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Bates View Post
I heard that longtime CFRA morning man Steve Madely has "retired".

Let us hope that Lorne Greene won't be far behind and that their replacements won't be sun news alumni.
You mean Lowell Green, right?
__________________
Gone... but never forgotten.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4555  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2015, 2:21 AM
YOWflier's Avatar
YOWflier YOWflier is online now
Melissa: fabulous.
 
Join Date: Apr 2005
Location: YOW/CYOW/CUUP
Posts: 3,196
^ Do not feed.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4556  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2015, 3:59 AM
Kitchissippi's Avatar
Kitchissippi Kitchissippi is offline
Busy Beaver
 
Join Date: Nov 2005
Location: Ottawa
Posts: 4,697
Well, both of them have done narration for shows with apes and monkeys.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4557  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2015, 8:55 PM
Norman Bates Norman Bates is offline
Living With My Mother
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 1,027
Now the splendid Shelley MacLean and Carol Anne Meehan have both been cut from CFRA / CJOH along with somebody named Rick gibbons. Sad to see the ladies go. Both added something to my day.
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4558  
Old Posted Nov 17, 2015, 10:54 PM
citydwlr citydwlr is offline
Registered User
 
Join Date: Mar 2013
Posts: 734
Quote:
Originally Posted by Norman Bates View Post
Now the splendid Shelley MacLean and Carol Anne Meehan have both been cut from CFRA / CJOH along with somebody named Rick gibbons. Sad to see the ladies go. Both added something to my day.
Lois Lee (previously on Rogers local), Eric Longley, and Carolyn Waldo were also let go, according to these tweets:
- https://twitter.com/sladurantaye/status/666733149393715202
- https://twitter.com/LoisLeeTV/status/666732774502432768
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4559  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2015, 12:52 AM
rocketphish's Avatar
rocketphish rocketphish is online now
Planet Ottawa and beyond
 
Join Date: Feb 2009
Location: Greater Ottawa
Posts: 14,687
CTV co-anchor, CFRA staff laid off in Bell Media job cuts

Chris Cobb, Ottawa Citizen
Published on: November 17, 2015 | Last Updated: November 17, 2015 4:54 PM EST


Longtime CTV News Ottawa co-anchor Carol Anne Meehan was one of a number of casualties Tuesday in a swath of job cuts at the local CTV station, as well as radio station CFRA, both owned by Bell Media.

Meehan confirmed her departure in an interview with the Citizen but refused further comment.

“I am in shock,” she said. “I don’t want to say any more than that. It’s a tough day.”

Meehan’s colleague, Olympic gold medal winner-turned-sports reporter Carolyn Waldo also lost her job.

It isn’t yet clear whether Meehan will be replaced or whether the evening newscast will continue with Graham Richardson as sole anchor.

Meehan was hired in 1989 by the station, followed by Waldo a year later.

CTV Ottawa now has three full-time and three part-time reporters left and one of the full-time reporters is currently on maternity leave.

Among other casualties were CFRA on-air staffers, Lunch Bunch host Rick Gibbons and traffic and weather reporter Shelley McLean, plus many behind-the-scenes staff at both stations including engineers, producers and several sales people.

Their departures the Monday retirement of veteran morning show host Steve Madely who told the Citizen that his departure was pre-planned and voluntary.

Ottawa Newspaper Guild president Debbie Cole – whose union represents CTV reporters, as well as both Meehan and Waldo – said the two women were the “face” of the six o’clock news.

“We are shocked and disappointed,’ she said. “These are two women who people in Ottawa have been looking to for decades for their news and sports. I don’t think this is going to help their image as a news leader in the city. It is a very shortsighted decision.”

Both women have three days to consider their options, said Cole, and under a seniority clause in the union-management contract have an option to take lesser roles at the station – a move that would mean two shorter serving employees losing their jobs.

“These are hard decisions for them to make,” added Cole.

News of the layoffs sparked an outpouring from Citizen readers who by late afternoon had left 270 comments on the newspaper’s Facebook page and dozens more under the story on its website (www.ottawacitizen.com)

The comments were overwhelmingly supportive of Meehan.

“Wow I am in shock also she has been in our family home every night since my son has been born well I myself am done watching the news on this network wow what a slap in her face!!”

“After Max, Carol Anne is exactly why we watch the 6pm news. She is an absolute pleasure to listen to. Quite a slap in the face for your viewers CTV. Sad day all around. More money for someone’s pockets.”

“Nooooo, say it ain’t so…..when will media bosses realize that having reporters who KNOW THEIR COMMUNITIES really matters? I guess we have to tell them with our pocket books. Meehan is definitely a person who knows the place she covers!”

“Carol Anne is part of our family. Send your thoughts to CTV… let them know.”

“I’ve got to let you know. BEll Media – I won’t be watching CTV news as a direct result of you letting Carole Anne go. She was a great anchor!!!! I’ll be watching CBC.”

Tuesday’s layoffs in Ottawa follow hundreds of job cuts at stations in Toronto and Montreal. Bell Media president Mary Ann Turcke earlier this month said cuts would be made on a “building-by-building” basis to help the company continue to “lead.”

Bell Media spokesman Matthew Garrow echoed Turcke’s rationale for the layoffs.

“While it is very difficult to part ways with valued colleagues,” he said, “the changes are an essential step in ensuring that Bell Media’s cost structure reflect the realities of revenue performance in media and broadcasting, and that we remain leaders in a fast-changing industry.”

Bell Media, a division of Bell Canada Enterprises, made an “adjusted” profit of $183 million last year.

Meehan spent much of her career at CJOH – later re-branded as CTV Ottawa – as co-anchor of the evening news with the late Max Keeping.

When Meehan’s husband Greg Etue committed suicide in 2012, viewers reacted with an outpouring of sympathy for her and her two children, a signal of the connection the newscaster has with the community.

Shortly before returning to work after his death, she said:

“What has helped us so much is the love and support that we have received, not just from our family and my friends and colleagues and my bosses here at work, but from all of you who sent cards and letters or simply gave me a hug when you encountered me out in public.

“I just don’t have the words to thank you all enough.”

Bell Media refused to say exactly how many Ottawa jobs it had axed Tuesday but according to various sources, it is about 20.

[email protected]
twitter.com/chrisicobb

http://ottawacitizen.com/news/local-news/ctv-co-anchor-cfra-staff-laid-off-in-bell-media-job-cuts
Reply With Quote
     
     
  #4560  
Old Posted Nov 18, 2015, 2:08 AM
Cre47's Avatar
Cre47 Cre47 is offline
Awesome!
 
Join Date: Mar 2006
Location: Orleans, ON
Posts: 1,971
I wish they would have kicked Lowell Green out instead. Of course, that will never happen, but retirement coming soon anyways for him... thank god.
__________________
"However, the Leafs have not won the Cup since 1967, giving them the longest-active Cup drought in the NHL, and thus are the only Original Six team that has not won the Cup since the 1967 NHL expansion." Favorite phrase on the Toronto Maple Leafs Wikipedia page.
Reply With Quote
     
     
This discussion thread continues

Use the page links to the lower-right to go to the next page for additional posts
 
 
Reply

Go Back   SkyscraperPage Forum > Regional Sections > Canada > Ontario > Ottawa-Gatineau > Downtown & Urban Ottawa
Forum Jump



Forum Jump


All times are GMT. The time now is 2:15 AM.

     

Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.7
Copyright ©2000 - 2026, vBulletin Solutions, Inc.